WHO. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1986.
2.
WHO. Shanghai declaration on promoting health in the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Paper presented at: 9th Global Conference on Health Promotion; 21-24 November 2016, Shanghai.
3.
SaelensBHandyS. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(7):S550–S566.
4.
2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: U.S: Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.
5.
VillanuevaKGiles-CortiBBulsaraM. Where do children travel to and what local opportunities are available? The relationship between neighborhood destinations and children’s independent mobility. Environ Behav. 2013;45(6):679–705.
6.
ChristianHEKlinkerCDVillanuevaK. The effect of the social and physical environment on children’s independent mobility to neighborhood destinations. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(6 suppl 1):S84–S93.
7.
ChristianHZubrickSR, Foster S, et al The influence of the neighborhood physical environment on early child health and development: a review and call for research. Health Place. 2015;33:25–36.
8.
VillanuevaKKnuimanMNathanA. The impact of neighborhood walkability on walking: Does it differ across adult life stage and does neighborhood buffer size matter?Health Place. 2014;25:43–46.
9.
AlparoneFRPacilliMG. On children’s independent mobility: the interplay of demographic, environmental, and psychosocial factors. Child Geogr. 2012;10(1):109–122.
10.
GalvezMMcGovernKKnuffC. Associations between neighborhood resources and physical activity in inner-city minority children. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(1):20–26.
11.
CaseyRChaixBWeberC. Spatial accessibility to physical activity facilities and to food outlets and overweight in French youth. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36(7):914–919.
12.
HarrisonFJonesAPvan SluijsEMCassidyABenthamGGriffinSJ. Environmental correlates of adiposity in 9-10 year old children: considering home and school neighbourhoods and routes to school. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(9):1411–1419.
13.
NapierMABrownBBWernerCMGallimoreJ. Walking to school: community design and child and parent barriers. J Environ Psychol. 2011;31(1):45–51.
14.
PageACooperAGriewPJagoR. Independent mobility, perceptions of the built environment and children’s participation in play, active travel and structured exercise and sport: the PEACH Project. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(1):17.
15.
TappeKAGlanzKSallisJFZhouCSaelensBE. Children’s physical activity and parents’ perception of the neighborhood environment: neighborhood impact on kids study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(39):1479–5868.
16.
KaczynskiABesenyiGStanisS. Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(1):146.
17.
DingDSallisJFKerrJLeeSRosenbergDE. Neighborhood environment and physical activity among youth: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(4):442–455.
18.
TimperioABallKSalmonJ. Personal, family, social and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(1):45–51.
19.
Giles-CortiBKeltySZubrickSVillanuevaK. Encouraging walking for transport and physical activity in children and adolescents: howiImportant is the built environment?Sports Med. 2009;39(12):995–1009.
20.
CarlsonJASaelensBEKerrJ. Association between neighborhood walkability and GPS-measured walking, bicycling and vehicle time in adolescents. Health Place. 2015;32(0):1–7.
21.
SmithMHoskingJWoodwardA. Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport–an update and new findings on health equity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):158.
22.
ChristianHBallSJZubrickSR. Relationship between the neighbourhood built environment and early child development. Health Place. 2017;48:90–101.
23.
VeitchJSalmonJBallK. Children’s active free play in local neighborhoods: a behavioral mapping study. Health Educ Res. 2008;23(5):870–879.
24.
ValentineG. ‘My Son’s a Bit Dizzy.’ ‘My Wife’s a Bit Soft’: gender, children and cultures of parenting. Gend Place Cult. 1997;4(1):37–62.
25.
WoodLMartinK. What makes a good play area for children? Centre for the Built Environment and Health, Perth, Australia: The University of Western Australia; 2010.
26.
VeitchJBagleySBallKSalmonJ. Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on childrens’ active free-play. Health Place. 2006;12(4):383–393.
27.
BowlerDEBuyung-AliLMKnightTMPullinAS. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:456.
28.
KomroKFlayBBiglanA. Creating nurturing environments: a science-based framework for promoting child health and development within high-poverty neighborhoods. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2011;14(2):111–134.
29.
BejleriISteinerRLProvostREFischmanAArafatAA. Understanding and mapping elements of urban form that affect children’s ability to walk and bicycle to school. Transportat Res Record. 2009;2137(1):148–158.
30.
ChomitzVRAskeDBMcDonaldJCabralHHackerKA. The role of recreational spaces in meeting physical activity recommendations among middle school students. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(suppl 1):S8–S16.
31.
WillenbergLJAshboltRHollandD. Increasing school playground physical activity: a mixed methods study combining environmental measures and children’s perspectives. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(2):210–216.
32.
BrittinJSorensenDTrowbridgeM. Physical activity design guidelines for school architecture. PloS one. 2015;10(7):e0132597.
33.
BonellCFarahJHardenA. Systematic review of the effects of schools and school environment interventions on health: evidence mapping and synthesis. Public Health Res. 2013;1(1) doi: 10.3310/phr01010.
34.
Engler-StringerRLeHGerrardAMuhajarineN. The community and consumer food environment and children’s diet: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):522.
35.
RahmanTCushingRAJacksonRJ. Contributions of built environment to childhood obesity. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78(1):49–57.
36.
WilliamsJScarboroughPMatthewsA. A systematic review of the influence of the retail food environment around schools on obesity-related outcomes. Obes Rev. 2014;15(5):359–374.
37.
BaekJSánchezBNBerrocalVJSanchez-VaznaughEV. Distributed lag models: examining associations between the built environment and health. Epidemiology. 2016;27(1):116–124.
38.
Healthy Active by Design. Evidence supporting the health benefits of access to Healthy Food. Perth, Australia: Heart Foundation; 2018.
39.
DurandCPTangXGabrielKP. The association of trip distance with walking to reach public transit: data from the california household travel survey. J Transp Health. 2016;3(2):154–160.
40.
McCormackGRShiellA. In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):125.
41.
CaspiCESorensenGSubramanianSVKawachiI. The local food environment and diet: a systematic review. Health Place. 2012;18(5):1172–1187.
42.
RahmanianEGasevicDVukmirovichILearSA. The association between the built environment and dietary intake-a systematic review. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2014;23(2):183–196.
43.
SchulzMRomppelMGrandeG. Built environment and health: a systematic review of studies in Germany. J Public Health. 2018;40(1):8–15.
44.
FengJGlassTACurrieroFCStewartWFSchwartzBS. The built environment and obesity: A systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Health Place. 2010;16(2):175–190.
45.
DingDGebelK. Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: What have we learned from reviewing the literature?Health Place. 2012;18(1):100–105.
46.
PapasMAAlbergAJEwingRHelzlsouerKJGaryTLKlassenAC. The built environment and obesity. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29(1):129–143.
47.
ChristianHGiles-CortiBKnuimanMTimperioAFosterS. The influence of the built environment, social environment and health behaviors on body mass index. Results from RESIDE. Prev Med. 2011;53(1-2):57–60.
48.
MalamboPKengneAPDe VilliersALambertEVPuoaneT. Built environment, selected risk factors and major cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review. PloS One. 2016;11(11):e0166846.
49.
SundquistKErikssonUMezukBOhlssonH. Neighborhood walkability, deprivation and incidence of type 2 diabetes: a population-based study on 512,061 Swedish adults. Health Place. 2015;31:24–30.
50.
LealCChaixB. Influence of geographic life environments on cardiometabolic risk factors: a systematic review, a methodological assessment and a research agenda. Obes Rev. 2011;12(3):217–230.
51.
CoffeeNHowardNPaquetCHugoGDanielM. Is walkability associated with a lower cardiometabolic risk?Health Place. 2013;21:163–169.
52.
Müller-RiemenschneiderFPereiraGVillanuevaK. Neighborhood walkability and cardiometabolic risk factors in Australian adults: an observational study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:755.
53.
GaleaSAhernJRudenstineSWallaceZVlahovD. Urban built environment and depression: a multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(10):822–827.
54.
BernsteinKTGaleaSAhernJTracyMVlahovD. The built environment and alcohol consumption in urban neighborhoods. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91(2):244–252.
55.
DavernMT GLWhitzmanCHiggsC. Using spatial measures to test a conceptual model of social infrastructure that supports health and wellbeing. Cities Health. 2018. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2018.1443620.
56.
RenaldsHASmithJTHaleJP. A systematic review of built environment and health. Fam Community Health. 2010;33(1):68–78.
57.
TropedPJSaundersRPPateRRReiningerBUredaJRThompsonSJ. Associations between self-reported and objective physical environmental factors and use of a community rail-trail. Prev Med. 2001;32(2):191–200.
58.
Wendel-VosGCSchuitAJde NietRBoshuizenHCSarisWHKromhoutD. Factors of the physical environment associated with walking and bicycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(4):725–730.
59.
SchmidTZlotA. Relationships among community characteristics and walking and bicycling for transportation or recreation. Am J Health Promot. 2005;19(4):314–317.
60.
McCormackGRRockMTooheyAMHignellD. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. Health Place. 2010;16(4):712–726.
61.
StewartOTMoudonAVFesinmeyerMDZhouCSaelensBE. The association between park visitation and physical activity measured with accelerometer, GPS, and travel diary. Health Place. 2016;38:82–88.
62.
GunnLDMavoaSBoulangéCHooperPKavanaghAGiles-CortiB. Designing healthy communities: creating evidence on metrics for built environment features associated with walkable neighbourhood activity centres. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):164.
63.
KingTBentleyRThortonLKavanaghA. Does the presence and mix of destinations influence walking and physical activity? A multilevel study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:115.
64.
FrancisJWoodLJKnuimanMGiles-CortiB. Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(10):1570–1577.
65.
WhiteMPAlcockIWheelerBWDepledgeMH. Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(6):920–928.
66.
WoodLHooperPFosterSBullF. Public green spaces and positive mental health—investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing. Health Place. 2017;48:63–71.
67.
RoeJWard ThompsonCAspinallPA. Green space and stress: evidence from cortisol measures in deprived urban communities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(9):4086–4103.
68.
KhattakAJRodriguezD. Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in USA. Transportat Res Part A: Policy Pract. 2005;39(6):481–500.
69.
McNallyMKulkarniA. Assessment of influence of land use-transportation system on travel behavior. Transportat Res Record. 1997(1607):105–115.
70.
CerinELeslieEdu ToitLOwenNFrankLD. Destinations that matter: associations with walking for transport. Health Place. 2007;13(3):713–724.
71.
McCormackGRFriedenreichCSandalackBAGiles-CortiBDoyle-BakerPKShiellA. The relationship between cluster-analysis derived walkability and local recreational and transportation walking among Canadian adults. Health Place. 2012;18(5):1079–1087.
72.
KnuimanMWChristianHEDivitiniML. A longitudinal analysis of the influence of the neighborhood built environment on walking for transportation: the RESIDE study. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(5):453–461.
73.
ChristianHKnuimanMBullF. A new urban planning code’s impact on walking: The residential environments project. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(7):1219–1228.
74.
SallisJFBullFBurdettRetL. Use of science to guide city planning policy and practice: how to achieve healthy and sustainable future cities. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2936–2947.
75.
Boone-HeinonenJGuilkeyDKEvensonKRGordon-LarsenP. Residential self-selection bias in the estimation of built environment effects on physical activity between adolescence and young adulthood. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:70.
76.
CooganPFWhiteLFAdlerTJHathawayKMPalmerJRRosenbergL. Prospective study of urban form and physical activity in the Black Women study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(9):1105–1117.
77.
AdlakhaDHippAJMarxC. Home and workplace built environment supports for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(1):104–107.
78.
HoehnerCMAllenPBarlowCEMarxCMBrownsonRCSchootmanM. Understanding the independent and joint associations of the home and workplace built environments on cardiorespiratory fitness and body mass index. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(7):1094–1105.
79.
HooperPKnuimanMFosterSGiles-CortiB. The building blocks of a ‘Liveable Neighbourhood’: identifying the key performance indicators for walking of an operational planning policy in Perth, Western Australia. Health Place. 2015;36:173–183.
80.
State Government of Victoria. Plan Melbourne - Metropolitan Planning Strategy. Victoria: Department of Transport; 2018.
81.
SachsJD. From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2206–2211.
82.
BarnettDWBarnettANathanAVan CauwenbergJCerinE. Built environmental correlates of older adults’ total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):103.
83.
CerinENathanAVan CauwenbergJBarnettDWBarnettA; Council on Environment and Physical Activity (CEPA)–Older Adults working group. The neighbourhood physical environment and active travel in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):15.
84.
Van CauwenbergJNathanABarnettABarnettDCerinE. Relationships between neighborhood physical environmental attributes and older adults’ leisure-time physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0917-1.
85.
MoranMVan CauwenbergJHercky-LinnewielRCerinEDeforcheBPlautP. Understanding the relationships between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:79.
86.
O’Dare WilsonK. Community food environments and healthy food access among older adults: a review of the evidence for the Senior Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP). Soc Work Health Care. 2017;56(4):227–243.
87.
KerrJRosenbergDFrankL. The role of the built environment in healthy aging: community design, physical activity, and health among older adults. J Plan Lit. 2012;27(1):43–60.
88.
WonJLeeCForjuohSNOryMG. Neighborhood safety factors associated with older adults’ health-related outcomes: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med. 2016;165:177–186.
89.
GarinNOlayaBMiretM. Built environment and elderly population health: a comprehensive literature review. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2014;10:103–115.
90.
BarnettAZhangCJPJohnstonJMCerinE. Relationships between the neighborhood environment and depression in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017:1–24.
91.
MarquardtGBueterKMotzekT. Impact of the design of the built environment on people with dementia: an evidence-based review. Health Env Res Des J. 2014;8(1):127–157.
92.
U.S. Surgeon General. U.S Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overwieght and Obesity. 2001; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44206/, Accessed March 1, 2018.
93.
DonovanJLarsenKMcWhinnieJ. Food-sensitive planning and urban design: A conceptual framework for achieving a sustainable and healthy food system. Melbourne, Australia: Report commissioned by the National Heart Foundation of Australia (Victorian Division); 2011.
94.
CohenDAMarshTWilliamsonSGolinelliDMcKenzieTL. Impact and cost-effectiveness of family Fitness Zones: a natural experiment in urban public parks. Health Place. 2012;18(1):39–45.
95.
VeitchJBallKCrawfordDAbbottGRSalmonJ. Park improvements and park activity: a natural experiment. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):616–619.
96.
VillanuevaKBadlandHKvalsvigA. Can the neighborhood built environment make a difference in children’s development? Building the research agenda to create evidence for place-based children’s policy. Acad Pediatr. 2016;16(1):10–19.
97.
NathanAG.Active living in retirement village residents: exploring built and social enviromental correlates using mixed methods. Perth, Australia: School of Population Health, University of Western Australia; 2012.
98.
TuckettAGBanchoffAWWinterSJKingAC. The built environment and older adults: a literature review and an applied approach to engaging older adults in built environment improvements for health. Int J Older People Nurs. 2018; 13(1).doi: 10.1111/opn.12171.
99.
PucherJDillJHandyS. Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev Med. 2010;50(suppl 1):S106–S125.
100.
DaltonAMJonesAPPanterJROgilvieD. Neighbourhood, route and workplace-related environmental characteristics predict adults’ mode of travel to work. PloS One. 2013;8(6):e67575.
101.
LottrupLGrahnPStigsdotterUK. Workplace greenery and perceived level of stress: Benefits of access to a green outdoor environment at the workplace. Landsc Urban Plan. 2013;110:5–11.
ToQGChenTTLMagnussenCGToKG. Workplace physical activity interventions: a systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27(6):113–e123.
105.
Kahn-MarshallJLGallantMP. Making healthy behaviors the easy choice for employees: a review of the literature on environmental and policy changes in worksite health promotion. Health Educ Behav. 2012;39(6):752–776.
106.
ThorntonLELambKEBallK. Employment status, residential and workplace food environments: associations with women’s eating behaviours. Health Place. 2013;24:80–89.
107.
BurgoineTForouhiNGGriffinSJWarehamNJMonsivaisP. Associations between exposure to takeaway food outlets, takeaway food consumption, and body weight in Cambridgeshire, UK: population based, cross sectional study. BMJ. 2014;348: g1464.
108.
Giles-CortiBSallisJFSugiyamaTFrankLDLoweMOwenN. Translating active living research into policy and practice: one important pathway to chronic disease prevention. J Public Health Policy. 2015;36(2):231–243.
MacintyreS. Evidence in the development of health policy. Public Health. 2012;126(3):217–219.
111.
FraserSDSLockK. Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(6):738–743.
112.
ParraDGomezLPrattMSarmientoOLMosqueraJTricheE. Policy and built environment changes in Bogotá and their importance in health promotion. Indoor Built Environ. 2007;16(4):344–348.
113.
GlasgowREEmmonsKM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–433.
114.
RhodesRA. Policy Network Analysis. Oxford, UK: The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy; 2006:425–447.
115.
ChristianHKnuimanMDivitiniM. A longitudinal analysis of the influence of the neighborhood environment on recreational walking within the neighborhood: results from RESIDE. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(7):077009.
116.
AfshinAPenalvoJDel GobboL. CVD prevention through policy: a review of mass media, food/menu labeling, taxation/subsidies, built environment, school procurement, worksite wellness, and marketing standards to improve diet. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(11):98.
117.
DavernMTGunnLGiles-CortiBDavidS. Best practice principles for community indicator systems and a case study analysis: how community indicators Victoria is creating impact and bridging policy, practice and research. Soc Indic Res. 2017;131(2):567–586.
118.
BrowneGRDavernMGiles-CortiB. What evidence is being used to inform municipal strategic planning for health and wellbeing? Victoria, Australia, a case study. Evid Policy. 2017;13(3):401–416.