“parkrun” is a free and increasingly popular weekly 5-km walk/run international community event, representing a novel setting for physical activity (PA) promotion. However, little is known about who participates or why. This study aimed to identify sociodemographic, health, behavioral, individual, social, and environmental factors associated with higher levels of participation.
Design:
Cross-sectional.
Setting:
Tasmania, Australia; June 2016.
Participants:
Three hundred seventy two adult parkrun participants.
Measures:
Online survey measuring sociodemographic, health, individual, social and environmental factors, parkrun participation, and PA.
Respondents (n = 371) were more commonly women (58%), aged 35 to 53 years (54%), and occasional or nonwalkers/runners (53%) at registration. A total of 44% had overweight/obesity. Half had non-adult children, most spoke English at home, and 7% reported PA-limiting illness/injury/disability. Average run/walk time was 30.2 ± 7.4 minutes. Compared to regular walkers/runners at registration, nonwalkers/runners were less commonly partnered, more commonly had overweight/obesity, less physically active, and had poorer self-rated health. Multivariate analyses revealed relative parkrun participation was inversely associated with education level and positively associated with interstate parkrun participation, perceived social benefits, self-efficacy for parkrun, and intentions to participate.
Conclusion:
parkrun attracts nonwalkers/runners and population groups hard to engage in physical activity. Individual- and social-level factors were associated with higher relative parkrun participation. parkrun’s scalability, accessibility, and wide appeal confers a research imperative to investigate its potential for public health gain.
LeeIMShiromaEJLobeloFPuskaPBlairSNKatzmarzykPT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–229.
2.
WahidAManekNNicholsM. Quantifying the association between physical activity and cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(9):
3.
WenCPWaiJPTsaiMK. Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2011;378(9798):1244–1253.
4.
DingDLawsonKDKolbe-AlexanderTL. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1311–1324.
5.
World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010.
6.
HallalPCAndersenLBBullFCGutholdRHaskellWEkelundU. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):247–257.
7.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, National Health Survey, TableBuilder. Findings Based on Use of ABS TableBuilder Data. 2014-2015. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2006.
8.
ReisRSSalvoDOgilvieDLambertEVGoenkaSBrownsonRC. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337–1348.
9.
MurphyNMBaumanA. Mass sporting and physical activity events--are they “bread and circuses” or public health interventions to increase population levels of physical activity?J Phys Act Health. 2007;4(2):193–202.
10.
BowlesHRRisselCBaumanA. Mass community cycling events: who participates and is their behaviour influenced by participation?Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:39.
11.
LaneAMurphyNBaumanACheyT. Active for a day: predictors of relapse among previously active mass event participants. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(1):48–52.
12.
LaneAMurphyNBaumanA. The Impact of Participation in the Flora Women’s Mini-Marathon on Physical Activity Behaviour in Women. Research Report 1.: Centre for Health Behaviour Research, Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Waterford Institute of Technology and Irish Sports Council; 2008.
13.
Running USA. 2016 State of the Sport - U.S. Road Race Trends: Running USA; May 6, 2016 2016.
14.
ConnVSHafdahlARMehrDR. Interventions to increase physical activity among healthy adults: meta-analysis of outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(4):751–758.
15.
Australian Department of Health. Australia’s Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Adults (18-64 years). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Department of Health; 2014.
16.
AinsworthBEHaskellWLHerrmannSDMeckesNBassettDRJrTudor-LockeCGreerJLVezinaJWhitt-GloverMCLeonAS. The Compendium of Physical Activities Tracking Guide. Healthy Lifestyles Research Center, College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University. Retrieved 4 April 2018 from the World Wide Web. https://sites.google.com/site/compendiumofphysicalactivities/
17.
O’DonovanGLeeIMHamerMStamatakisE. Association of “weekend warrior” and other leisure time physical activity patterns with risks for all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(3):335–342.
18.
StevinsonCHicksonM. Exploring the public health potential of a mass community participation event. J Public Health (Oxf). 2014;36(2):268–274.
19.
SallisJOwenN. Ecological models of health behavior. In: GlanzKRimerBKLewisFM, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research & Practice. Vol 3rd Ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002:462–484.
20.
StokolsD.Establishing and maintaining healthy environments. Toward a social ecology of health promotion. Am Psychol. 1992;47(1):6–22.
21.
ClelandVBallKHumeCTimperioAKingACCrawfordD. Individual, social and environmental correlates of physical activity among women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(12):2011–2018.
22.
Giles-CortiBDonovanRJ. The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(12):1793–1812.
23.
McNeillLHWyrwichKWBrownsonRCClarkEMKreuterMW. Individual, social environmental, and physical environmental influences on physical activity among black and white adults: a structural equation analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2006;31(1):36–44.
24.
PanSYCameronCDesmeulesMMorrisonHCraigCLJiangX. Individual, social, environmental, and physical environmental correlates with physical activity among Canadians: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:21.
25.
RosenstockIM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Behav. 1974;2(4):328–335.
26.
BanduraA.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
27.
AjzenI. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: KuhlJBeckmanJ, eds. Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1985:11–39.
28.
KimiecikJCHornTS. Parental beliefs and children’s moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998;69(2):163–175.
29.
KimiecikJCHornTSShurinCS. Relationships among children’s beliefs, perceptions of their parents’ beliefs, and their moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1996;67(3):324–336.
30.
CraigCLMarshallALSjostromM. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2003;35(8):1381–1395.
31.
KendzierskiDDeCarloKJ. Physical activity enjoyment scale: two validation studies. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1991;13(1):50–64.
32.
National Centre for Culture and Recreation Statistics. Motivators and Constraints to Participation in Sports and Physical Recreation. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2007.
33.
MarcusBHSelbyVCNiauraRSRossiJS. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992;63(1):60–66.
34.
Giles-CortiBDonovanRJ. Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9):1583–1589.
35.
SallisJFGrossmanRMPinskiRBPattersonTLNaderPR. The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med. 1987;16(6):825–836.
36.
MujahidMSDiez RouxAVMorenoffJDRaghunathanT. Assessing the measurement properties of neighborhood scales: from psychometrics to ecometrics. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(8):858–867.
37.
WiltshireGStevinsonC. Exploring the role of social capital in community-based physical activity: qualitative insights from parkrun. Qual Res Sport Exer Health. 2018;10(1):47–62.
38.
WiltshireGFullagarSStevinsonC. Exploring parkrun as a social context for collective health practices: running with and against the moral imperatives of health responsibilisation. Sociol Health Illn. 2017;40(1):3–17.
39.
GidlowCJohnstonLHCroneDEllisNJamesD. A systematic review of the relationship between socio-economic position and physical activity. Health Educ J. 2006;65(4):338–367.
40.
BeenackersMAKamphuisCBGiskesK. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:116.
41.
TrostSGOwenNBaumanAESallisJFBrownW. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2002;34(12):1996–2001.
42.
SassatelliR. Fitness Culture: Gyms and the Commercialisation of Discipline and Fun. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
43.
SalmonJOwenNCrawfordDBaumanASallisJF. Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference. Health Psychol. 2003;22(2):178–188.
44.
ClelandVBallKHumeCTimperioAKingACrawfordD. Individual, social and environmental correlates of physical activity among women living in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(12):2011–2018.
45.
ClelandVCrawfordDTimperioA. Are perceptions of the physical and social environment associated with mothers’ walking for leisure and transport behaviours? A longitudinal study. Prev Med. 2008;47(2):188–193.
46.
SallisJFCerinEConwayTL. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2016;387(10034):2207–2217.
47.
RogersonMBrownDKSandercockGWoollerJJBartonJ. A comparison of four typical green exercise environments and prediction of psychological health outcomes. Perspect Public Health. 2016;136(3):171–180.
48.
HutchinsonJCTenenbaumG. Attention focus during physical effort: the mediating role of task intensity. Psychol Sport Exer. 2007;8(2):233–245.
