Survey measures assessed stated support for 5 policies to promote physically active transportation, access to active transportation facilities, and time spent in a car. County-level estimates included household car dependence and funding for bicycle–pedestrian projects.
Analysis:
Multivariable generalized linear mixed models using binary distribution and logit link, accounting for clustering within county.
Results:
Respondents supported policies for accommodating bicyclists and pedestrians through street improvements (89%), school active transportation programs (75%), employer-funded active commuting incentives (67%), and allocation of public funding (68%) and tax support (56%) for building and maintaining public transit. Residents spending >2 h/d (vs <0.7 hours) in cars were more likely to support street (odds ratio [OR]: 1.87; confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-3.22) and public transit (OR: 1.85; CI: 1.24-2.77) improvements. Residents in counties investing >$1.6 million in bicycle and pedestrian improvements expressed greater support for funding (OR: 1.71; CI: 1.04-2.83) and tax increases (OR: 1.73; CI: 1.08-2.75) for transit improvements compared to those with lower prior investments (<$276 100).
Conclusion:
Support for policies to enable active transportation is higher where relevant investments in active transportation infrastructure are large (>$1.6 M), public transit is nearby, and respondents drive >2 h/d.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Step It Up! The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Promote Walking and Walkable Communities. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2015.
2.
Active Transportation Surveillance-United States, 1999-2012. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(3):e1–e4.
3.
SaundersLEGreenJMPetticrewMPSteinbachRRobertsH. What are the health benefits of active travel? A systematic review of trials and cohort studies. PLos One. 2013;8(8):13.
4.
HamerMChidaY. Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med. 2008;46(1):9–13.
5.
PucherJBuehlerRMeromDBaumanA. Walking and cycling in the United States, 2001-2009: evidence from the National Household Travel Surveys. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(suppl 1):S310–S317.
6.
BesserLMDannenbergAL. Walking to public transit steps to help meet physical activity recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(4):273–280.
7.
ChriquiJFLeiderJThrunENicholsonLMSlaterS. Communities on the move: pedestrian-oriented zoning as a facilitator of adult active travel to work in the United States. Front Public Health. 2016;4:71.
8.
BeenackersMAFosterSKamphuisC. Taking up cycling after residential relocation: built environment factors. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):610–615.
9.
ChildSTSchoffmanDEKaczynskiATForthoferMWilcoxSBaruthM. Neighborhood attributes associated with the social environment. Am J Health Promot. 2016;30(8):634–637.
10.
ChriquiJFLeiderJThrunENicholsonLMSlaterSJ. Pedestrian-oriented zoning is associated with reduced income and poverty disparities in adult active travel to work, United States. Prev Med. 2016;95(suppl):S126–S133.
11.
GustatJRiceJParkerKMBeckerABFarleyTA. Effect of changes to the neighborhood built environment on physical activity in a low-income African American neighborhood. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E57.
12.
FitzhughECBassettDREvansMF. Urban trails and physical activity a natural experiment. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(3):259–262.
13.
MeromDBaumanAVitaPCloseG. An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling—the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney. Prev Med. 2003;36(2):235–242.
14.
National Physical Activity Plan. National Physical Activity Plan for the United States. Columbia, South America: National Physical Activity Plan; 2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State Indicator Report on Physical Activity, 2014. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
17.
GaseLNBarraganNCSimonPAJacksonRJKuoT. Public awareness of and support for infrastructure changes designed to increase walking and biking in Los Angeles County. Prev Med. 2015;72:70–75.
18.
GustatJO’MalleyKHuT. Support for physical activity policies and perceptions of work and neighborhood environments: variance by BMI and activity status at the county and individual levels. Am J Health Promot. 2014;28(3 Suppl):S33–S43.
19.
LongMWGortmakerSLPatelAIOnufrakSJWilkingCLCradockAL. Public perception of quality and support for required access to drinking water in schools and parks [published online October 3, 2016]. Am J Health Promot. 2016:pii:0890117116671253.
20.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Interactive Atlases Web Site. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/atlas/. Updated May 2, 2017. Accessed April 17, 2013.
21.
2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington, USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.
22.
BrownsonRCSchmidTLKingAC. Support for policy interventions to increase physical activity in rural Missouri. Am J Health Promot. 1998;12(4):263–266.
23.
CerinESaelensBESallisJFFrankLD. Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: validity and development of a short form. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(9):10.
24.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_documentation/index.htm. Updated August 29, 2017. Accessed March 25, 2014.
25.
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2007-2011. https://www.census.gov/acs/www/. Updated August 31, 2017. Accessed June 27, 2013.
CradockALTropedPJFieldsB. Factors associated with federal transportation funding for local pedestrian and bicycle programming and facilities. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30(suppl 1):S38–S72.
29.
SudmanS. Applied sampling. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1976.
30.
PucherJBuehlerRBassettDRDannenbergAL. Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(10):1986–1992.
31.
ResnikDB. Urban sprawl, smart growth, and deliberative democracy. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(10):1852–1856.
Belanger-GravelAGauvinLFullerDDrouinL. Implementing a public bicycle share program: impact on perceptions and support for public policies for active transportation. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(4):477–482.
34.
DodsonEAStamatakisKAChalifourSHaire-JoshuDMcBrideTBrownsonRC. State legislators’ work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities?J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013;19(1):25–29.
35.
Alliance for Biking & Walking. Bicycling & Walking in the United States: 2016 Benchmarking Report. Washington, USA: Alliance for Biking & Walking; 2016.
36.
ZwaldMLEylerAAGoinsKVBrownsonRCSchmidTLLemonSC. Understanding municipal officials’ involvement in transportation policies supportive of walking and bicycling. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014;23(4):348–355.
37.
LambKEWhiteSR. Categorisation of built environment characteristics: the trouble with tertiles. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:8.
