To test the effects of different messengers on the dissemination of health information.
Design:
An experimental study exposed participants to 12 news articles pertaining to 1 of 3 health topics framed from the perspective of 4 generic messengers: religious figures, doctors, celebrity patients, or ordinary patients. Participants select as many of the 12 articles as desired.
Setting:
A cancer clinic within a large, urban hospital serving a sociodemographically diverse patient population.
Participants:
Eighty-nine patients with a history of cancer.
Measures:
The primary outcome was the frequency with which each news story was selected.
Analysis:
Summary statistics and a general estimating equation model.
Results:
For each health topic, news articles using celebrity messengers were the least likely to be selected; almost half of the participants (36 [41.4%] of 87) rejected all such articles. Articles linked to religious figures were equally unpopular (P = .59). Articles that used doctors or ordinary patients as the messenger were very likely to be selected: Nearly all women (84 [96.6%] of 87) selected at least one of these. Furthermore, the odds of choosing articles linked to celebrities or religious leaders were statistically significantly lower than the odds of choosing those linked to ordinary patients or doctors (P < .01).
Conclusion:
Commonly used generic messengers had large effects on the dissemination of information. Health materials linked to celebrities or religious figures were consistently less likely to be selected than those linked to ordinary patients, or doctors.
CorbettJMoriM. Medicine, media, and celebrities: news coverage of breast cancer, 1960-1995. J Mass Commun Q. 1999; 76(2):229–249.
2.
WrightKSparksLO’HairD, eds. Health Communication in the 21st Century. Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
3.
ObregonRWaisbordS, eds. The Handbook of Global Health Communication. Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
4.
ChapmanSMcLeodKWakefieldMHoldingS. Impact of news of celebrity illness on breast cancer screening: Kylie Minogue’s breast cancer diagnosis. Med J Aust. 2005;183(5):247–250.
5.
MetcalfeDPriceCPowellJ. Media coverage and public reaction to a celebrity cancer diagnosis. J Public Health. 2011;33(1):80–85.
6.
MacArthurGJWrightMBeerHParanjothyS. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme. J Med Screen. 2011;18(4):204–209.
7.
NoarSMRibislKMAlthouseBMAyersJW. Using digital surveillance to examine the impact of public figure pancreatic cancer announcements on media and search query outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;(47):188–194.
8.
NattingerABHoffmannRGHowell-PelzAGoodwinJS. Effects of Nancy Reagan’s mastectomy on choice of surgery for breast cancer by US women. JAMA. 1998;279(10):762–766.
9.
HornikR, ed. Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.
10.
RiceRAtkinC, eds. Public Communication Campaigns. London, United Kingdom: Sage; 2013.
11.
LawtonBRoseSMcLeodDDowellA. Changes in use of hormone replacement therapy after the report from the Women’s Health Initiative: cross sectional survey of users. BMJ. 2002;327(7419):845–846.
12.
ViswanathK. Science and society: the communications revolution and cancer control. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(10):828–835.
13.
Gathirua-MwangiWGMonahanPOStumpTRawlSM, Skinner CS, Champion VL. Mammography adherence in African-American women: results of a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2015;50(1):70–78.
14.
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2016. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2016.
Moldovan-JohnsonMTanAHornikR. Navigating the cancer information environment: the reciprocal relationship between patient-clinician information engagement and information seeking from nonmedical sources. Health Commun. 2014;29(10):974–983.
17.
BaschEThalerHShiWYakrenSSchragD. Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions. Cancer. 2004;100(11):2476–2483.
18.
CastletonKFongTWang-GillamA. A survey of Internet utilization among patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2001;1(8):1183–1190.
19.
StrykerJEEmmonsKMViswanathK. Uncovering differences across the cancer control continuum: a comparison of ethnic and mainstream cancer newspaper stories, Prev Med. 2007;44(1):20–25.
20.
YanovitzkyIBlitzCL. Effect of media coverage and physician advice on utilization of breast cancer screening by women 40 years and older. J Health Commun. 2000;5(2):117–134.
21.
MeissnerHIPotoskyALConvissorR. How sources of health information relate to knowledge and use of cancer screening exams. J. Commun Health. 1992;17(3):153–165.
22.
National Institutes of Health. Estimates of Funding for Various Research, Condition, and Disease Categories (RCDC) March 7, 2014. http://report.nih.gov/categorical_spending.aspx. Accessed August 20, 2014.
23.
Celebrity cancer patients and survivors. Newsday. 2014. https://newsday.com. Accessed September 1, 2016.
24.
Stars who have battled cancer. New York Daily News. https://NYdailynews.com. Accessed September 1, 2016.
25.
StewartK. 18 Celebrities with breast cancer. Everyday Health. 2014. https://Everydayhealth.com. Accessed September 1, 2016.
26.
SangweniY. 11 Celebrities affected by breast cancer. Essence Magazine. https://Essence.com. Accessed September 1, 2016.
Ambulatory care use and physician office visits, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. 2014. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/physician-visits.htm. Accessed March 6, 2017.
32.
OermannM. Effects of educational intervention in waiting room on patient satisfaction. J Ambul Care Manage. 2003;26(2):150–158.
33.
ProchaskaJZabinskiMCalfasKSallisJPatrickK. PACE+: interactive communication technology for behavior change in clinical settings. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(2):127–131.
34.
FishmanJMTenhaveTCasarettD. Cancer and the media: how does the news report on treatment and outcomes?Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(6):515–518.
35.
DigglePHeagertyPLiangKZegerS. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nd ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2002.
36.
AnshelMSmithM. The role of religious leaders in promoting healthy habits in religious institutions. J Relig Health. 2014;53(4):1046–1059.
37.
BoppMBaruthM. Leading their flocks to health? Clergy health and the role of clergy in faith-based health promotion interventions. Fam Commun Health. 2013;36(3):182–192.
38.
DaherM. Cultural beliefs and values in cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(suppl 3):66–69.
