Exploring Online Asynchronous Counseling With Tobacco Treatment Specialists in the QUIT-PRIMO and National Dental PBRN HI-QUIT Studies: Who Uses It and What Do They Say?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2018
Exploring Online Asynchronous Counseling With Tobacco Treatment Specialists in the QUIT-PRIMO and National Dental PBRN HI-QUIT Studies: Who Uses It and What Do They Say?
To describe the content of messages sent by smokers through asynchronous counseling within a Web-based smoking cessation intervention.
Design:
Qualitative.
Setting:
National community-based setting of patients who had been engaged by the medical or dental practices at which they attended or via Google advertisements.
Participants:
Adults older than 19 years who were current smokers and interested in quitting. Participants throughout the United States referred to a Web-based cessation intervention by their medical or dental provider or by clicking on a Google advertisement.
Methods:
We conducted a qualitative review of 742 asynchronous counseling messages sent by 270 Web site users. Messages were reviewed, analyzed, and organized into qualitative themes by the investigative team.
Results:
The asynchronous counseling feature of the intervention was used most frequently by smokers who were white (87%), female (67%), aged 45 to 54 (32%), and who had at least some college-level education (70%). Qualitative analysis yielded 7 basic themes—Talk about the Process of Quitting, Barriers to Quitting, Reasons to Quit, Quit History, Support and Strategies for Quitting, Quitting with Medication, and Quit Progress. The most common theme was Support and Strategies for Quitting with 255 references among all messages.
Conclusion:
We found rich communication across the spectrum of the quit process, from persons preparing to quit to those who had successfully quit. Asynchronous smoking cessation counseling provides a promising means of social support for smokers during the quit process.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults—United States, 2005-2012. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(2): Accessed December 5, 2014.
FioreMCBaileyWCCohenSJ. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. 52008.
5.
JorenbyDE. Smoking cessation strategies for the 21st century. Circulation. 2001;104(11):E51–E52.
6.
HuttonHEWilsonLMApelbergBJ. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials: web-based interventions for smoking cessation among adolescents, college students, and adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011;13(4):227–238. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq252.
7.
FileT. Computer and Internet Use in the United States. Current Population Survey Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2013:20–568.
8.
HouJShimM. The role of provider-patient communication and trust in online sources in Internet use for health-related activities. J Health Commun. 2010;15(suppl 3):186–199. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.522691.
9.
CottenSRGuptaSS. Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(9):1795–1806. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020.
10.
Koch-WeserSBradshawYSGualtieriLGallagherSS. The Internet as a health information source: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey and implications for health communication. J Health Commun. 2010;15(suppl 3):279–293. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.522700.
11.
HongT. Internet health information in the patient-provider dialogue. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(5):587–589. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0172.
12.
BylundCLGueguenJASabeeCMImesRSLiYSanfordAA. Provider-patient dialogue about Internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(3):346–352. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.009.
13.
CobbNKGrahamAL. Characterizing Internet searchers of smoking cessation information. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e17.
14.
ShahabLMcEwenA. Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction. 2009;104(11):1792–1804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02710.x.
15.
BockBCGrahamALWhiteleyJAStoddardJL. A review of web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATIs). J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5):e39. doi:10.2196/jmir.989.
16.
GainsburySBlaszczynskiA. A systematic review of Internet-based therapy for the treatment of addictions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(3):490–498. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.007.
17.
AnLCPerryCLLeinEB. Strategies for increasing adherence to an online smoking cessation intervention for college students. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8(suppl 1):S7–S12. doi:10.1080/14622200601039881.
18.
StrecherVJShiffmanSWestR. Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction. 2005;100(5):682–688. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01093.x.
19.
BrendryenHKraftP. Happy ending: a randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention. Addiction. 2008;103(3):478–484; discussion 485-476. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02119.x.
20.
JapuntichSJZehnerMESmithSS. Smoking cessation via the internet: a randomized clinical trial of an internet intervention as adjuvant treatment in a smoking cessation intervention. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8(suppl 1):S59–S67. doi:10.1080/14622200601047900.
21.
PikeKJRabiusVMcAlisterAGeigerA. American Cancer Society’s QuitLink: randomized trial of Internet assistance. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(3):415–420. doi:10.1080/14622200701188877.
22.
MunozRFLenertLLDelucchiK. Toward evidence-based Internet interventions: a Spanish/English web site for international smoking cessation trials. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8(1):77–87. doi:10.1080/14622200500431940.
23.
PattenCACroghanITMeisTM. Randomized clinical trial of an Internet-based versus brief office intervention for adolescent smoking cessation. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1-3):249–258. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.001.
24.
McKayHGDanaherBGSeeleyJRLichtensteinEGauJM. Comparing two web-based smoking cessation programs: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5): e40. doi:10.2196/jmir.993.
25.
SadasivamRSHoganTPVolkmanJE. Implementing point of care “e-referrals” in 137 clinics to increase access to a quit smoking internet system: the Quit-Primo and National Dental PBRN HI-QUIT Studies. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(4):370–378. doi:10.1007/s13142-013-0230-3.
26.
RayMNFunkhouserEWilliamsJH; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group. Smoking-cessation e-referrals: a national dental practice-based research network randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(2):158–165. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.018.
27.
CreswellJW. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
28.
SadasivamRSDelaughterKCrenshawK. Development of an interactive, Web-delivered system to increase provider-patient engagement in smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e87. doi:10.2196/jmir.1721.
29.
SadasivamRSKinneyRLDelaughterK; National Dental PBRN Group; QUIT-PRIMO Collaborative Group. Who participates in Web-assisted tobacco interventions? The QUIT-PRIMO and National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Hi-Quit studies. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):e77. doi:10.2196/jmir.2385.
30.
HoustonTKSadasivamRSFordDERichmanJRayMNAllisonJJ. The QUIT-PRIMO provider-patient Internet-delivered smoking cessation referral intervention: a cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2010;5:87. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-87.
31.
StraussACorbinJ. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998.
32.
StraussALCorbinJM. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1990.
ProchaskaJODiClementeCC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390–395. doi:10.1037//0022-006X.51.3.390.
