A survey focusing on the use of the Case Method of Instruction (CMI) in special education teacher preparation programs was sent to 257 randomly selected members of the Teacher Education Division (TED) of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). Surveys from 141 individuals were returned, representing a 55.8% return rate. The survey was designed to obtain information regarding (a) subject characteristics, (b) characteristics of students and institutions, (c) teacher educators' perceptions of CMI, and (d) methods used to implement CMI in special education teacher preparation programs. More than 78% of respondents were using, or had used within two years, CMI and 90% felt positive about their ability to teach using cases. Greater than 17% were considering adopting CMI. Respondents reported using CMI most frequently in assessment and methods classes. Primary advantages of CMI cited by respondents were that this method allowed students to apply theory to practice and enabled students to develop problem-solving skills. Potential disadvantages included the amount of preparation and implementation time, difficulty finding appropriate cases, and the demands placed on the instructor (e.g., well-developed classroom management and group facilitation skills). Based upon results of this preliminary investigation, issues related to practical and research applications of CMI were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beckman, M.D. (1972). Evaluating the case method. The Educational Forum, 36, 489-497.
2.
Buck, G., Morsink, C., Griffin, C., Hines, T., & Lenk, L. (1992). Preservice training: The role of field-based experiences in the preparation of effective special educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 108-123.
3.
Buzzell, J.B. (1996). School & family partnerships: Case studies for regular and special educators. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.
4.
Buzzell, J.B., & Piazza, R. (1994). Case studies for teaching special needs and at-risk students. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers .
5.
Carnegie Commission (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York : Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
6.
Case discussions part II: In case you wanted more!! (1996, April). Stratenotes: A National Newsletter for SIM Trainers, 4(7), 1-4.
7.
Christensen, C.R., & Hanson, A.J. (1987). Teaching and the case study method. Boston: Harvard Business School.
8.
Colbert, J., Trimble, K. , & Desberg, P. (Eds.) ( 1996). The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
Cranston-Gingras, A., Raines, S., Paul, J., Epanchin, B., & Roselli, H. (1996). Developing and using teaching cases in a partnership environment. Teacher Education and Special Education, 19, 158-168.
10.
Ertmer, P.A., & Russell, J.D. (1995). Using case studies to enhance instruction design education. Educational Technology, 35(4), 23-31.
11.
Ertmer, P.A., Newby, T.J., & MacDougall, M. (1996). Students' responses and approaches to case-based instruction: The role of reflective self-regulation . American Educational Research Journal, 33, 719-752.
12.
Fink, A., & Kosecoff, J. (1985). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
Fowler, F.J., Jr. (1984). Survey research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
Galloway, J., & Sheridan, S.M. (1994). Implementing scientific practices through case studies: Examples using home-school interventions and consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 385-413.
15.
Goor, M.B. (1995). Leadership for special education administration: A case-based approach. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company.
16.
Gragg, C.I. (1954). Because wisdom can't be told. In M. P. McNair and A. C. Hersum (Eds.), The case method at the Harvard Business School (6-14). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Hallahan, D.P., & Kauffman, J.M. (1994). Cases for reflection and analysis for Exceptional Children: Introduction to Special Education, Sixth Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
18.
Hamel, J. (1993). Case study methods. London : Sage Publications.
19.
Harrington, H. (1991). The case as method. Action in Teacher Education, 12(4), 1-10.
20.
Holmes Group (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author .
21.
Jackson, A.H. (1985). Teaching pediatric psychopharmacology: An interdisciplinary model. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry , 24, 103-108.
22.
Johnson, J., & Purvis, J. (1987). Case studies: An alternative learning/teaching method in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 26, 118-120.
23.
Jones, C.J. (1992). Case studies of mildly handicapped students: Learning disabled, mildly mentally retarded and behavior disordered. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
24.
Jones, C.J. (1993a). Case studies of exceptional students: Handicapped and gifted. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
25.
Jones, C.J. (1993b). Case studies of severely/multihandicapped students . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas .
26.
Kagan, D.M. (1993). Contexts for the use of classroom cases. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 703-723.
27.
Katz, L.G., & Goffin, S.G. (1990). Issues in the preparation of teachers of young children. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Early childhood teacher preparation (pp. 192-208). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Kleinfeld, J. (1990a). The case method in teacher education: Alaskan models. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. Digest EDO-RC-90-6, 2-3.
31.
Kleinfeld, J. (1990b). The special virtues of the case method in preparing teachers for minority schools. Teacher Education Quarterly , Winter, 43-51.
32.
Knirk, F.G. (1991). Case materials: Research and practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(1), 73-81.
33.
Lee, Y.S. (1983). Public management and case study methods. Teaching Political Science: Politics in Perspective, 11(1), 6-14.
34.
Lyons, N. (1989). Teaching by the case method: One teacher's beginnings . On teaching and learning, 3, 28-35.
35.
Masoner, M. (1988). An audit of the case study method. New York: Praeger.
36.
McLoughlin, J.B., & Lewis, R.B. (1994). Assessing special students (4th ed.). New York: Merrill-MacMillan .
37.
McWilliam, P.J. (1992). The case method of instruction: Teaching application and problem-solving skills to early interventionists. Journal of Early Intervention, 16, 360-373.
38.
McWilliam, P.J. (1995). Teaching family-centered skills through the case method of instruction. Zero-to-Three, 15(3), 30.
39.
McWilliam, P.J., & Bailey, D.B. (1993). Working together with children and families: Case studies in early intervention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
40.
Merseth, K.K. (1991). The case for cases in teacher education. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education, American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
41.
Merseth, K.K. (1992). The early history of case-based instruction: Insights for teacher education today. Journal of Teacher Education , 42(4), 243-249.
42.
Mostert, M.P. (1995). A review of Case Studies for Teaching Special Needs and At-Risk Students byJ. B. Buzzell and R. Piazza. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18, 220, 221.
43.
National Commission on Excellence in Education ( 1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for education reform . Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
44.
O'Connell, A.L., & Bates, B. (1976). The case method in nurse practitioner education . Nursing Outlook, 23(4), 243-246.
45.
Rasinski, T.V. (1989). The case method approach in reading education . Reading Horizons, Fall, 5-14.
46.
Richardson, V. (1996). Forward II. In J. Colbert, K. Trimble, & P. Desberg (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. ix, x). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
47.
Richert, A.E. (1992). Writing cases : A vehicle for inquiry into the teaching process. In J. H. Shulman (Editor), Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
Sansalone, M. (1990). Teaching structural concepts through case studies and competitions. Engineering Education, May/June, 472-475.
49.
Schon, D. A. (Ed.) (1991). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
Schwartz, P.L., Fiddes, T.M., & Dempster, A.G. (1987). The case-based learning day: Introducing problem-based learning into a traditional medical curriculum . Medical Teacher, 9(3), 275-280.
51.
Shulman, J.H. (1992). Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
52.
Shulman, J.H. (1993, April). Teaching cases: New approaches to the pedagogy of teacher education and staff development. Preconference session presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association , Atlanta, GA.
53.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching . Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
54.
Shulman, L.S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1-30). New York: Teachers College Press.
55.
Silverman, R., Welty, W.M., & Lyon, S. (1992). Case studies for teaching problem solving. Hightstown, NJ: McGraw-Hill.
56.
Sykes, G. (1989). Learning to teach with cases. Colloquy, 2(2), 7-13.
57.
Taylor, R.L. (1993). Assessment of exceptional students (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
58.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: The Falmer Press .
59.
Tiedt, I.M. (1992). Responding to the call of stories: Learning from literary 'case studies.' Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 802-805.
60.
Using cases as the basis for teacher learning. (1996, March). Stratenotes: A National Newsletter for SIM Trainers, 4(9), 1-4.
61.
Wasserman, S. (1993). Getting down to cases: Learning to teach with case studies. New York: Teachers College Press.
62.
Wasserman, S. (1994a). Getting down to cases: Learning to teach with case studies. New York: Teachers College Press.
63.
Wasserman, S. (1994b). Introduction to case method tecaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
64.
Wasserman, S. (1994c). Using cases to study teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 602-611.
