The need for a common vocabulary and conceptual orientation is discussed as it relates to the notion of language learning disability. Components of language, dimensions of language performance, and the processing of language all contribute to the concept of language learning disability. The social construction of collaborative meaning is discussed as it relates to the need for a common vocabulary applied in an interpersonal context and to the larger context of the school or classroom. Implications for teacher training are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, J. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
2.
Aram, D., & Nation, J. (1980). Preschool language disorders and subsequent language and academic difficulties. Journal of Communication Disorders , 13, 159-170.
3.
Brown, A., & Smiley, S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying text . Child Development, 49, 1076-1088.
4.
Chafe, W. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Clark, E. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 65-110). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Duell, O. (1986). Metacognitive skills. In G. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning (pp. 205-242). New York: Academic Press.
7.
Elliott-Faust, D.J., & Pressley, M. (1986). How to teach comparison processing to increase children's short- and long-term listening comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 27-33.
8.
Hale, G.A. (1983). Students' predictions of prose forgetting and the effects of study strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology , 75, 708-715.
9.
Halliday, M. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. New York: Arnold.
10.
Halliday, M. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
11.
Hudson, P., Correa, V., Morsink, C., & Dykes, M.K. (1987). A new model for preservice training: Teacher as collaborator. Teacher Education and Special Education, 10, 191-193.
12.
Kamhi, A., & Catts, H. (1988). Reading disabilities: A developmental language perspective. Boston: College-Hill Press.
13.
Lindsay, P., & Norman, D. (1977). Human information processing (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press .
14.
Lyon, G.R., & Risucci, D. (1988). Classification of learning disabilities. In K. Kavale (Ed.), Learning disabilities: State of the art and practice (pp. 44-70). Boston: College-Hill Press.
15.
Pisoni, D., & Luce, P. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition . Cognition, 25, 21-52.
16.
Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Swanson, H.L. (1987). Information processing theory and learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Leaming Disabilities, 20, 3-7.
18.
Tulving, E., & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization in memory. New York: Academic Press.
