Single-concept fliers dealing with students who are academically frustrated and students who do not pay attention in class were evaluated by 176 regular and special educators. The fliers were designed to provide assistance to teachers at a very basic level. The ratings were positive and the data are presented in tabular format.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cruickshank, D.R., Lorish, C., & Thompson, L. (1979). What we think we know about inservice education . Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 27-32.
2.
Kelly, E.J., & Vanvactor, J.C. (1983). The relative cost effectiveness of inservice approaches in remote sparsely populated schools. Exceptional Children, 50, 140-148.
3.
Mangieri, J.N., & Kemper, R.E. (1983). A model for designing, evaluating, and reporting staff development. Action in Teacher Education, 5, 39-42.
4.
Swenson, T.L. (1981). The state-of-the-art in inservice education and staff development in K-12 schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15, 2-7.
5.
Whorton, J.E., Siders, J.A., & Gaar, B.L. (1983). Single concept fliers: An alternative to inservice training. Reading Improvement, 20, 316-318.
