This article proposes a conceptual model for analyzing major delivery systems of instructional content (separate course, integration into ongoing courses, and combined approach) used in Dean's Grants. Curriculum and faculty development issues are considered and weighted. Implications of the impact of delivery systems in Dean's Grants are suggested for the incorporation of content on other sociopolitical issues (e.g., multicultural education, child abuse) into the teacher education curriculum.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bergquist, W.H. (1978). Relationship of collegiate professional development and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 18-24.
2.
Corrigan, D.C. (1978). Public Law 94-142: A matter of human rights; a call for change in schools and colleges of education. In J.K. Grosenick & M.C. Reynolds (Eds.), Teacher education: Renegotiating roles for mainstreaming (pp. 17-29). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
3.
Davies, H. (1978). Interview with the director. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(3), 45-46.
4.
Denemark, G., & Nelli, E. (1980). Emerging patterns of initial preparation for teachers: Generic teaching domains. Paper presented atUniversity of Florida, Gainesville.
5.
Gaff, J.G. (1975). Toward faculty renewal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Gazvoda, M. (1981). A national survey of Dean's Grant projects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, American University.
7.
Gerlach, R.A. (1979). Law-related teacher education: A college and university responsibility. Journal of Teacher Education, 30(4), 31-32.
8.
Grant, C.A. (1983). Multicultural teacher education-Renewing the discussion: A response to Martin Haberman. Journal of Teacher Education , 34(2), 29-32.
9.
Grosenick, J.K., & Reynolds, M.C. (Eds.). (1978). Teacher education: Renegotiating roles for mainstreaming. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
10.
Hall, G.E. (1978). Facilitating institutional change using the individual as the frame of reference. In J.K. Grosenick & M.C. Reynolds (Eds.), Teacher education: Renegotiating roles for mainstreaming (pp. 47-71). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
11.
Lakin, K.C., & Reynolds, M.C. (1983). Curricular implications of Public Law 94-142 for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 13-18.
12.
Lortie, D.C. (1975). School teacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Molnar, A., & Gliszczinski, C. (1983). Child abuse: A curriculum issue in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(5), 39-41.
14.
Rodriguez, F. (1984). Multicultural teacher education: Interpretation, pitfalls, and commitments. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 47-50.
15.
Sattler, J.L., & Graham, L.P. (1983). Special education content included in regular education programs. Teacher Education and Special Education , 6(2), 124-130.
16.
Scannell, D.P. (1979). Declining enrollments in colleges of education: Is special education immune? Teacher Education and Special Education, 2(2), 21-24.
17.
Sims, W.E. (1980). Humanizing education for handicapped and culturally different students. Journal of Professional Studies, 5(2), 35-48.
18.
Weisenstein, G.A., & Gall, M.D. (1978). Adapting teacher education to include mainstreaming: Dean's Grant projects. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(6), 22-24.
19.
Whelan, R.J. (1979). Creeping senility in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2(2), 43-44.
20.
Yaffe, E. (1980). Public education: Society's band-aid. Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 452-454.
21.
Zgliczynski, S.M., & Rodolfa, E. (1980). The teacher's responsibility to the abused child . Journal of Teacher Education, 31(5), 41-44.
