Barton, A.H., & Lazarsfeld, P.F.Some functions of qualitative analysis in social research. In G.J. McCall & J.L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley , 1969.
2.
Frank, L.K.Evaluation of educational programs. In B.C. Porter (Ed.), The Oregon studies: Research, development, diffusion, evaluation (Vol. II). Monmouth, Ore.: Teaching Research, 1972.
3.
Gephart, W.J.Criteria for methodological adequacy for research on educational change. In B.C. Porter (Ed.), The Oregon studies: Research, development, diffusion, evaluation (Vol. II). Monmouth, Ore.: Teaching Research, 1972.
4.
Hastings, J.T.The kith and kin of educational measures. In B.C. Porter (Ed.), The Oregon studies: Research, development, diffusion, evaluation (Vol. II). Monmouth, Ore.: Teaching Research, 1972, 460-464.
5.
Hatry, H.P.Overview of modern program analysis characteristics and techniques. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1969.
6.
Levenson, B., & McDill, M.S.Vocational graduates in auto mechanics: A follow-up study of negro and white youth. Phylon, 1966 , 27 (4), 347-357.
7.
Scriven, M.Evaluation perspectives and procedures. In W.J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education: Current applications . Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan Publishing , 1974.
8.
Smith, E.G., Levy, F.R., Wohlstetter, P., & Shuchat, J.Assessment of the status of marketing of education materials for the handicapped . Belmont, Mass.: Contract Research Corp., January, 1978.
9.
Stufflebeam, D.L., & Webster, W.J.An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1980, 2(3), 5-20.
10.
Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, Mass.: G & C Merriam, 1973.
11.
Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, College Edition, New York: The New World Publishing Co., 1966.
