Blackhurst, A.E.Some practical considerations in implementing competency-based special education training programs. In J.J. Creamer & J.T. Gilmore (Eds.), Design for competency-based education in special education. Syracuse : Syracuse University, Division of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 1974.
3.
Blackhurst, A.E.Competency-based special education personnel preparation. In R.D. Kneedler & S.G. Tarver (Eds.), Changing perspectives in special education . Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill , 1977.
4.
Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T., & Madaus, G.F.Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
5.
Brinkerhoff, R., & Plummer, C.Evaluating inservice training programs workshop. Evaluation Training Consortium, Chicago, April, 1979.
6.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
7.
Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T.Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for field studies. Chicago: Rand cNally, 1979.
8.
Cronbach, L.J.Course improvement through evaluation. In B.R. Worthen & J.R. Sanders (Eds.), Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1973 .
Dunst, C.J.Program evaluation and the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Exceptional Children, 1979, 46(1), 24-31.
11.
Edelfelt, R.A. (Ed.). Inservice education: Criteria for and examples of local programs . Bellingham: Western Washington State College, 1977.
12.
Edelfelt, R.A., & Lawrence, G.In-service education: The state of the art. In R.A. Edeifeit & M. John-son (Eds.), Pethinking in-service education. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1975.
Jackson, P.W.Old dogs and new tricks: Observations on the continuing education of teachers . In L.J. Rubin (Ed.), Improving inservice education: Proposals and procedures for change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1971.
15.
Lawrence, G., Baker, D., Elzie, P., & Hansen, B.Patterns of effective in-service eeucation: A state of the arts summary of research on materials and procedures for changing teacher behaviors in in-service education. Gainesville: Florida State Department of Education, 1974.
16.
Meade, E.J., Jr.No health in us. In L.J. Rubin (Ed.), Improving in-service education: Proposals and procedures for change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon , 1971.
17.
Metfessel, N.S., & Michael, W.B.A paradigm involving multiple criterion measures for the evaluation of the effectivenss of school programs. In B.R. Worthen & J.R. Sanders (Eds.), Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, Calif. : Wadsworth, 1973.
18.
Meyen, E.L.Inservice training: Our only alternative in implementing P.L. 94-142. In R. Heinich (Ed.), Instructional technology and the education of all handicapped children: A collection of papers by seventeen educators on some implications of P.L. 94-142. Columbus, Ohio: National Center on Educational Media and Materials for the Handicapped, 1977.
19.
Moyer, J.R., Knowiton, H.E., & Berdine, W.H.The conference workshop: A primer for the uninitiated in workshop design, implementation, and evaluation. Paper presented at the annual convention of The Council for Exceptional Children, Kansas City, April, 1978.
20.
Nagel, T.S., & Richman, P.T.Competency-based instruction: A strategy to eliminate failure. Columbus, Chio: Charles E. Merrill, 1972.
21.
Neisworth, J.T., & Wilder, J.M.Evaluation report on the workshop: How to effectively mediate a professional presentation. Unpublished manuscript, 1975.
22.
Rubin, L.J. (Ed.). Improving in-service education: Proposals and procedures for change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon , 1971.
23.
Shores, R., Cegelka, P.T., & Nelson, C.M.Competency-based special education teacher training. Exceptional Children, 1973, 40, 192-198.
24.
Siantz, J., & Moore, E.Inservice programming and preservice priorities. In J. Smith (Ed.), Personnel preparation and Public Law 94-142: The map, the mission, and the mandate. Boothwyn, Penn.: Educational Resources Center, 1978.
25.
Sirotnik, K.A.Introduction to matrix sampling for the practitioner. In W.J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education . Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1974.
26.
Skrtic, T.S., Knowlton, H.E., & Clark, F.L.Action versus reaction: A curriculum development approach to inservice education . Focus on Exceptional Children, 1979, 11(1), 1-16.
27.
Steele, S.M.Contemporary approaches to program evaluation. Syracuse, ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult Education, 1973.
28.
Stuffelbeam, D.L.Alternative approaches to educational evaluation: A self-study guide for educators . In W.J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1974.
Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G.R.Applying behavior analysis procedures with children and youth. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1977.
31.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D., & Semmel, M.Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Leadership Training Institute, 1974.
32.
Wieck, C.Training and development of staff: Lessons from business and industry. Education Unlimited, 1979, 1(3), 6-13.
33.
Woodington, D.Some impressions of the evaluation of training in industry. Phi Delta Kappan, 1980, 61(5), 326-328.
34.
Worthen, B.R., & Sanders, J.R. (Eds.). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice . Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1973.