Arreola v. Santa Ana Board of Education (Orange County, California), No. 160 577 (1968).
2.
Blanton, R.L.Historical perspectives on classification of mental retardation. In N. Hobbs (Ed.), Issues in the classification of children. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1975.
3.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. 347 U. S. (1954).
4.
Coulter, W. A., & Morrow, H. W. (Eds.) Adaptive behavior: Concepts and measurements . New York: Grune & Stratton , 1978.
5.
Diana v. California State Beard of Education. No. C-70 37 RFP, District Court of Northern California (February, 1970).
6.
Duffey, J.B., Salvia, J., Tucker, J., & Ysseldyke, J.Non-biased assessment: A need for operationalism. Panel presentation at the meeting of The Council for Exceptional Children , Kansas City, Missouri, 1978.
7.
Fisher, A.Effects of implementing a two-dimensional definition of mental retardation . Adaptive Behavior Newsletter, October, 1977 .
8.
Grossman, H. (Ed.). Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation (Special publication No. 2). Washington, D. C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency , 1973.
9.
Helton, G.B., Morrow, H.W., & Yates, J.R.Grouping for instruction 1965-1975-1985. The Reading Teacher , 1977, 31, 28-33.
10.
Hobson v. Hanson. 269 F Supp. 401 (1967).
11.
Larry P. v. Riles. 343 F. Supp. 1306 (1972).
12.
Leland, H.Introduction and theoretical considerations. In E. Kagin (Ed.), Conference on measurement of adaptive behavior: III. Parsons, Ks.: Parsons State Hospital and Training Center, 1968.
Leland, H.Theoretical considerations of adaptive behavior. In W. A. Coulter & H. W. Morrow (Eds.), Adaptive behavior: Concepts and measurements. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1978.
15.
Matti T. v. Holladay, Civil Action No. DC-75-315, September, 1977 (Mississippi).
16.
Mercer, J.R.Anticipated achievement: Computerizing the self-fulfilling prophesy. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association Convention, Honolulu, September, 1972 .
17.
Mercer, J.R.Labeling the mentally retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
Mercer, J.R.SOMPA conceptual and technical manual. New York, Psychological Corporation, in press.
21.
Morrow, H.W., Coulter, J., & Coulter, W.A.National adaptive behavior survey, 1977-1978. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Ontario, Canada, September, 1978.
22.
Morrow, H.W., Powell, G.D., & Ely, D.D.Placement or placebo: Does additional information change special education placement decisions. Journal of School Psychology, 1976, 14, 186-191.
23.
Newland, T.E.Assumptions underlying psychological testing. Journal of School Psychology, 1973, 11, 316-322.
24.
Oakland, T., & Matuszek, P.Using tests in nondiscriminatory assessment. in T. Oakland (Ed.), With bias toward none: Non-biased assessment of minority group children. Lexington, Ky.: Coordinating Office for Regional Resource Centers, 1976 .
25.
Office of Civil Rights.Elimination of discrimination in the assignment of children to special education classes for the mentally retarded. Memorandum, 11-28-72.
26.
Spangler v. Pasadena Board of Education, 31 1 F. Supp. 501 (1 970).
27.
Talley, R.C.Evaluating the effects of implementing the system of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment: A qualitative perspective. School Psychology Digest , 1979, 8, 71-78.
28.
Tucker, J.A.Operationalizing the diagnostic-intervention process. In T. Oakland (Ed.), With bias toward none: Non-biased assessment of minority group children. Lexington, Ky.: Coordinating Office for Regional Resource Centers, 1976 .