Bandura, A.Principles of behavior modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1969.
2.
Bolton, F., & Clark, J.Computer-managed instruction. Journal of Educational Data Processing, 1973, 10, 5-9.
3.
Bukoski, W., & Korotkin.Computing activities in secondary education. Washington, D.C.: American Institute for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, 1975.
4.
Christie, L.S., & McKenzie, H.S.Minimum objectives: A measurement system to provide special education in regular classrooms. Unpublished manuscript, University of Vermont, 1973.
5.
Dagnon, C., & Spuck, D.W.A role for computers, individualizing education-and it's not teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 1977, 58, 460-62.
6.
Fisher, C.W., Filby, N.N., Marliave, R.S., Cohen, L.S., Dishaw, M.M., Moore, J.E., & Berliner, D.C.Teacherbehaviors, academic learning time, and student achievement: Technical report V-1, Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study . San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1978.
7.
Hall, R.V.Behavior management (Vol. 1). Lawrence, Kans.: H & H Enterprises, 1971.
8.
Haring, N.G., & Gentry, N.D.Direct and individualized instructional procedures. In N.G. Haring & R.L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.), Teaching special children. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
9.
Moyer, J.R., & Dardig, J.C.Practical task analysis for special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 1978, 11, 16-18.
10.
Rieth, H.J., Polsgrove, L., McLeskey, J., Anderson, R., & Payne, K.The use of self-recording to increase the arithmetic performance of severely behaviorally disordered students. Monograph in Behavioral Disorders, 1978, 1, 50-58.
11.
Rieth, H.J., Polsgrove, L., & Semmel, M.I.A data-based service cascade model for mildly handicapped high school students (grant application). Bloomington: CITH, Indiana University, 1978.
12.
Scanlon, R.Computer-managed instruction: Present trends and future directions. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, 1974.
13.
Semmel, M.I.Application of systematic classroom observation to the study and modification of pupil-teacher interaction in special education. In R. Weinberg & F.H. Woods (Eds.), Observation of pupils and teachers in mainstream and special education settings: Alternative strategies. Minneapolis : The Council for Exceptional Children, 1975.
14.
Semmel, M.I., & Oison, J.Microcomputer-based games as instructional strategies in support of in-service training for parents and residential/community staff working with the severely and profoundly handicapped (grant application). Bloomington : CITH, Indiana University, 1978 .
15.
Semmel, M.I., Olson, J., & Frick, T.A technological innovation utilizing microprocessors and videotape for inservice education of teachers of the handicapped: Portable COMAVI-Computer Mediated Assessment of Videotaped Instruction (grant application). Bloomington: CITH, Indiana University, 1978.
16.
Semmel, M.I., Semmel, D., & Morrissey, P.Competency-based teacher education in special education: A review of research and training programs. Bloomington: CITH, Indiana University, 1976.
17.
Splittgerber, F.L.Computer-based instruction: A revolution in the making. Educational Technology, 1979, 19, 20-26.
18.
Stolurow, L.M.The effectiveness of CAI. Unpublished paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Educational Data Systems, New York, 1960.