Amidon, E.J., & Amidon, P.Skill development in teaching work manual. Minneapolis : Association for Productive Teaching, 1969.
2.
Azrin, N., Holz, W., Ulrich, R., & Goldiamond, I.The control of conversation through reinforcement . Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961, 4, 25-30.
3.
Barber, T.X., & Silver, M.J.Fact, fiction, and the experimental bias effect. Psychological Bulletin Monograph, 1968, 70, 1-29.
4.
Beasley, C.Practicum observation form. Logan, Utah: Utah State University, 1976.
5.
Clairborn, W.L.Expectancy effects in the classroom: A failure to replicate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969, 60, 377-383.
6.
Denny, D.A.Identification of teacher-classroom variables facilitating pupil creative growth.American Educational Research Journal, 1968, 5, 365-383.
Flanders, N.A., Morrison, B.M., & Brode, E.L.Changes in pupil attitudes during the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1968, 50, 334-338.
9.
Gage, N.L.Teaching methods. In R.L. Ebel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1969.
10.
Gallagher, J.J.A "topic classification system" for classroom observation, and three studies of the classroom. In Classroom observation. American Educational Research Monograph (No. 6). Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970.
11.
Horn, E.Distribution of opportunity for participation among various pupils in classroom recitations. Teachers College contracted education, 1914, No. 67.
Hunter, E.Talking in first grade classrooms. Urban Review, 1969, 4, 39-43.
14.
Jason, H.A study of medical teaching practices. Journal of Medical Education, 1962, 37, 1258-1284.
15.
Johnson, S., & Bolstad, O.Methodological issues in naturalistic observation: Some problems and solutions for field research. In L. Hamerlynck, L. Handy, & E. Mash (Eds.), Behavior change: Methodology, concepts, and practice. Champaign, III.: Research Press, 1973.
16.
Kent, R.The human observer: An imperfect cumulative recorder. Paper presented at the Fourth Banff International Conference on Behavior Modification , Banff, Alberta, Canada, March 1972.
17.
Lindvall, C.M., & Cox, R.C. The IPI evaluation program. American Educational Research Association Monograph (No. 5). Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970.
18.
Matthews, C.C., & Phillips, D.G.Child-structured learning in science in the Atlanta Public Schools, 1969, January-February.
19.
Medley, D.M., & Mitzel, H.E.Measuring classroom behavior by systematic observation. In N.L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally , 1963.
20.
Moore, J.R.An analysis of teacher and pupil verbal behavior and teacher procedural and evaluative behavior in relation to objectives unique to PSSC and non-PSSC physics curricula. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, 1968.
21.
Pawlicki, R.Behavior-therapy research with children: A critical review. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1970, 2(3), 163-173.
22.
Perkins, H.V.Classroom behavior and underachievement. American Educational Research Journal, 1965, 2, 1-12.
23.
Puckett, R.C.Making supervision objective. School Review, 1928, 36, 209-212.
24.
Rapp, D.W.Detection of observer bias in the written record. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Experimenter effects in behavioral research . New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts , 1966.
25.
Rhodes, F.Team teaching compared with traditional instruction in grades kindergarten through six. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971, 62, 110-116.
26.
Rosenshine, B.Evaluation of classroom instruction. Review of Educational Research, 1970, 40, 279-300.
27.
Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N.F.Research on teacher performance criteria. In B.O. Smith (Ed.), Research in teacher education: A symposium . Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall , 1971.
28.
Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N.The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R.M.W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
29.
Rosenthal, R.Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
30.
Rosenthal, R., & Fode, K.L.Three experiments in experimenter bias. Psychological Reports , 1963, 12, 491-511.
31.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobsen, L.Teacher's expectancies: Determinants of pupils' IQ gains. Psychological Reports, 1966, 19, 115-118.
32.
Rosenthal. R., & Lawson, R.A longitudinal study of the effects of experimenter bias on the operant learning of laboratory rats. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1964, 2, 61-72.
33.
Scott, P., Burton, R.V., & Yarrow, M.Social reinforcement under natural conditions. Child Development , 1967, 38, 53-63.
34.
Simon, A., & Boyer, E.G. (Eds.) Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments (Vols. 1-6). Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, 1967.
35.
Simon, A., & Boyer, E.G. (Eds.). Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments (Vols. 7-14). Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, 1970. (a)
36.
Simon, A., & Boyer, E.G. (Eds.). Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of classroom observation instruments (Vols. A & B). Philadelphia : Research for Better Schools, 1970 . (b)
37.
Skindrud, K.An evaluation of observer bias in a simulation of experimental field studies of social interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1972.
38.
Smith, B.O.Teachers for the real world. Washington, D.C.: The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 1969.
39.
Smith, B.O., & Meux, M.O.A study of the logic of teaching. Urbana, III.: University of Illinois Press, 1970.
40.
Travers, R.M.W.The limitations of variables derived from common language. In Perspectives on recent research, American Educational Research Association Cassette Tape Series. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association, 1971.
41.
Wallen, N.E.Relationships between teacher characteristics and student behavior - Part II. U.S. Office of Education Cooperative Research Project No. 2096. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, 1964.
42.
Wallen, N.E., Durkin, M.C., Fraenkel, J.R., McNaughton, A.H., & Sawin, E.I.The Taba curriculum development project in social studies: Development of a comprehensive curriculum model for social studies for grades one through eight inclusive of procedures for implementation and dissemination. Final report. U.S. Office of Education, Bureau of Research, Project No. 5-1314, Grant No. OE-6-10-182. San Francisco: San Francisco State College, 1969.
43.
Wright, E.M.J.Teacher-pupil interaction in the mathematics classroom, A sub-project report of the Secondary Mathematics Evaluation Projects. (Tech. Rep. 76-5). St. Paul, Minn.: Minnesota National Laboratory, Minnesota State Department of Education, 1967.
