Increasing Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Skills Using a Mixed-Reality Simulator: The Tale of Two Studies

Abstract

To date, research on mixed-reality simulation (MRS) has focused on various skills including applied behavior analysis, but studies have not evaluated the role of preservice teachers’ perceived knowledge, confidence, usefulness, or actual practice related to data collection. To address this gap, we conducted two separate MRS studies, one for behavioral data collection, and one for sharing academic progress in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) meeting. Results of both studies indicate participants’ perceptions of their knowledge and confidence significantly increased as well as their actual knowledge or performance. Qualitative findings provide insight into how participants perceived the authenticity of the simulation experiences as well as suggestions regarding dosage and implementation. Limitations, implications for teacher education, and future research are discussed.

Keywords

data collection individual education program mixed-reality preservice teachers simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Accardo

Xin

(2017). Using technology-based simulations to promote teacher candidate parental collaboration and reflective instructional decision making. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 475–494.

Alberto

Troutman

A. C.

(2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Pearson.

Anderson

L. M.

Stillman

J. A.

(2013). Student teaching’s contribution to preservice teacher development: A review of research focused on the preparation of teachers for urban and high-needs contexts. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 3–69.

Beck

S. J.

DeSutter

(2020). An examination of group facilitator challenges and problem solving techniques during IEP Team Meetings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419839766

Brawley

Stormont

M. A.

(2014). Investigating reported data practices in early childhood: An exploratory study. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(2), 102–111. https://doi./10.1177/1098300713480838

Bruhn

A. L.

Wehby

J. H.

Hasselbring

T. S.

(2020). Data-based decision making for social behavior: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719876098

Campbell

D. T.

Stanley

(1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally.

Carlson

Qualls

L. W.

Scott

S. N.

Cunningham

J. E. M.

Hirsch

S. E

. (2023). Mixed-reality simulation and pre-service teacher education: A systematic review [manuscript submitted for publication]. Clemson University.

Chatterji

A. K.

(2018). Innovation and American K–12 education. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 18(1), 27–51. https://doi-org.libproxy.clemson.edu/10.1086/694406

10.

Cheek

A. E.

Idol

W. A.

Jones

J. L.

Holden

K. B.

(2019). Infusing technology throughout teacher preparation programs to support preservice teacher development. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 8(2), 1–14. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/josea/vol8/iss2/8

11.

Cooper

J. O.

Heron

T. E.

Heward

W. L.

(2020). Applied behavior analysis. Pearson.

12.

Dalinger

Thomas

K. B.

Stansberry

Xiu

(2020). A mixed reality simulation offers strategic practice for pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 144, 103696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103696

13.

Darling-Hammond

(2014). Strengthening clinical preparation: The holy grail of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.939009

14.

Darling-Hammond

Hyler

M. E.

Gardner

(2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

15.

Dawson

M. R.

Lignugaris/Kraft

. (2017). Meaningful practice: Generalizing foundation teaching skills from TLE TeachLivE™ to the classroom. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416664184

16.

Dieker

L. A.

Lane

H. B.

Allsopp

D. H.

O’Brien

Butler

T. W.

Kyger

Lovin

Fenty

N. S.

(2009). Evaluating video models of evidence-based instructional practices to enhance teacher learning. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(2), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409334202

17.

Dieker

L. A.

Rodriguez

J. A.

Lignugaris /Kraft

Hynes

M. C.

Hughes

C. E.

(2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33.

18.

Driver

Zimmer

Murphy

(2018). Using mixed reality simulations to prepare preservice special educators for collaboration in inclusive settings. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(1), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519841421

19.

Ely

Alves

K. D.

Dolenc

N. R.

Sebolt

Walton

E. A.

(2018). Classroom simulation to prepare teachers to use evidence-based comprehension practices. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1399487

20.

Ely

Kennedy

M. J.

Pullen

P. C.

Williams

M. C.

Hirsch

S. E.

(2014). Improving instruction of future teachers: A multimedia approach that supports implementation of evidence-based vocabulary practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(4), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.012

21.

Enicks

A. N.

(2012). Using TeachLivE to improve pre-service special education teacher practices [Doctoral dissertation]. Western Michigan University.

22.

Glesne

(2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Pearson.

23.

Hudson

M. E.

Voytecki

K. S.

Owens

T. L.

Zhang

(2019). Preservice teacher experiences implementing classroom management practices through mixed-reality simulations. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519841421

24.

Hudson

M. E.

Voytecki

K. S.

Zhang

(2018). Mixed-reality teaching experiences improve preservice special education students’ perceptions of their ability to manage a classroom. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v11i2.7308

25.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (2006 & Supp.V. 2011)

26.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 (2012).

27.

Jimerson

J. B.

Wayman

J. C.

(2015). Professional learning for using data: Examining teacher needs & supports. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700405

28.

Judge

T. A.

Rodell

J. B.

Klinger

R. L.

Simon

L. S.

Crawford

E. R.

(2013). Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 875–925. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033901

29.

Krach

S. K.

Hanline

M. F.

(2018). Teaching consultation skills using interdepartmental collaboration and supervision with a mixed-reality simulator. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 28(2), 190–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2017.1301818

30.

Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Powers

Diebold

Germer

Common

E. A.

Brunsting

(2015). Improving teachers’ knowledge of functional assessment-based interventions: Outcomes of a professional development series. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0001

31.

Larson

Hirsch

S. E.

McGraw

Bradshaw

C. P.

(2020). Preparing preservice teachers to manage behavior problems in the classroom: The feasibility and acceptability of using a mixed-reality simulator. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419836415

32.

Ledford

J. R.

Lane

J. D.

Gast

D. L.

(2018). Dependent variables, measurement, and reliability. In Ledford

J. R.

Gast

D. L.

(Eds.), Single case methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 97–132). Taylor & Francis.

33.

McKown

Hirsch

S. E.

Carlson

Allen

Walters

(2022). Preservice special education teachers’ perceptions of mixed-reality simulation experiences. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 38(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1995796

34.

McLeskey

Maheady

Billingsley

Brownell

Lewis

(Eds.). (2019). High-leverage practices for inclusive settings. Routledge; Council for Exceptional Children.

35.

Means

Padilla

Gallagher

(2010). Use of education data at the local level: From accountability to instructional improvement. U.S. Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html#edtech.

36.

Moxley

J. A.

Ericsson

K. A.

Tuffiash

(2017). Gender differences in SCRABBLE performance and associated engagement in purposeful practice activities. Psychological Research, 83, 1147–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0905-3

37.

Murphy

K. M.

Cook

A. L.

Fallon

L. M.

(2021). Mixed reality simulations for social-emotional learning. Phi Delta Kappa, 102(6), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721721998152

38.

Peterson

M. B.

(2014). Pre-service special education teachers’ frequency of opportunities to respond in the TeachLivE virtual classroom [Doctoral Dissertation, Texas Women’s University]. Dissertations and Theses Global.

39.

Riccomini

P. J.

Morano

Hughes

C. A.

(2017). Big ideas in special education: Specially designed instruction, high-leverage practices, explicit instruction, and intensive instruction. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917724412

40.

Rosati-Peterson

G. L.

Piro

J. S.

Straub

O’Callaghan

(2021). A nonverbal immediacy treatment with pre-service teachers using mixed reality simulations. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1882114. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2021.1882114

41.

Ruble

L. A.

McGrew

J. H.

Toland

Dalrymple

Adams

Snell-Rood

(2018). Randomized control trial of COMPASS for improving transition outcomes of students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(10), 3586–3595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3623-9

42.

Saldaña

(2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

43.

Simonsen

Myers

(2015). Classwide positive behavior interventions and supports: A guide to proactive classroom management. Guilford Publications.

44.

Stecker

P. M.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2008). Progress monitoring as essential practice within response to intervention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050802700403

45.

U.S. Department of Labor. (2022, February 20). Special education teachers. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/education-training-and-library/special-education-teachers.htm

46.

Vince Garland

K. M.

Holden

Garland

D. P

. (2016). Individualized clinical coaching in the TLE TeachLivE lab: Enhancing fidelity of implementation of system of least prompts among novice teachers of students with autism. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415600769

47.

Walters

Hirsch

S. E.

Carlson

McKown

Allen

(2021). Mixed-reality simulation with preservice teacher candidates: A conceptual replication. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44, 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211001453