Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This latent class analysis study used a bias-adjusted three-step approach to empirically identify mutually exclusive clusters of teacher professional qualifications based on commonly studied indicators of teacher quality. We then examined the relationship between cluster membership and the mathematics gains of adolescents at risk for mathematics difficulties (MD), including students with disabilities and those without disabilities. We identified students at risk for MD as those performing at or below the 25th percentile on the state exam. We empirically identified eight qualitatively distinct and interpretable teacher qualification clusters. Based on value-added models, we found that teachers in Cluster 5 had lower average math learning gains than their peers in clusters with the most experienced and credentialed teachers. Cluster 5 included teachers who were novice and early-career, traditionally prepared math majors. We observed significant effects for the end or grade scores for the middle grades but not the algebra scores of high school students, suggesting teacher cluster membership effects varied by grade level. We discuss limitations and offer implications for research and policy.

Keywords

mathematics difficulties secondary school teacher preparation participant characteristics mathematics achievement at risk students quantitative methods research methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allensworth

E. M.

Clark

(2020). High school GPAs and ACT scores as predictors of college completion: Examining assumptions about consistency across high schools. Educational Researcher, 49(3), 198–211.

Bakk

Oberski

D. L.

Vermunt

J. K.

(2014). Relating latent class assignments to external variables: Standard errors for correct inference. Political Analysis, 22(4), 520–540.

Bakk

Vermunt

J. K.

(2016). Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 20–31. https://10.1080/10705511.2014.955104

Benjamini

Hochberg

(1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x

Benjamini

Yekutieli

(2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. The Annals of Statistics, 29(4), 1165–1188.

Bergman

L. R.

Magnusson

(1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9(2), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457949700206X

Bettini

E. A.

Crockett

J. B.

Brownell

M. T.

Merrill

K. L.

(2016). Relationships between working conditions and special educators’ instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 50(3), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916644425

Blevins

C. A.

Weathers

F. W.

Witte

T. K.

(2014). Dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 27(4), 388–396.

Bloom

H. S.

Hill

C. J.

Black

A. R.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1(4), 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802400072

10.

Bolck

Croon

Hagenaars

(2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001

11.

Bruckers

Molenberghs

Dendale

(2017). Clustering multiply imputed multivariate high-dimensional longitudinal profiles. Biometrical Journal, 59(5), 998–1015.

12.

Cavalluzzo

(2004). Is national board certification an effective signal of teacher quality?. The CNA Corporation.

13.

Chen

S. Y.

Feng

(2017). A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 9(6), 1725–1729.

14.

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633

15.

Chiang

H. M.

Lin

Y. H.

(2007). Mathematical ability of students with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism: A review of literature. Autism, 11(6), 547–556.

16.

Coenen

Cornelisz

Groot

van den Brink

H. M.

Van Klaveren

(2018). Teacher characteristics and their effects on student test scores: A systematic review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(3), 848–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12210

17.

Collier

Z. K.

Leite

W. L.

(2017). A comparison of three-step approaches for auxiliary variables in latent class and latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1365304

18.

Collins

L. M.

Lanza

S. T.

(2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. John Wiley & Sons.

19.

Cowan

Goldhaber

(2016). National board certification and teacher effectiveness: Evidence from Washington State. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(3), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1099768

20.

Every Child Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015. Public Law No. 114-95, S.1177, 114th Cong.

21.

Feng

Figlio

Sass

(2018). School accountability and teacher mobility. Journal of Urban Economics, 103, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.11.001

22.

Feng

Sass

T. R.

(2013). What makes special-education teachers special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities. Economics of Education Review, 36, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.06.006

23.

Fuchs

L. S.

Powell

S. R.

Seethaler

P. M.

Cirino

P. T.

Fletcher

J. M.

Fuchs

Hamlett

C. L.

(2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 89–100.

24.

Griffith

(2016). State Teacher Salary Schedules. Policy Analysis. Education Commission of the States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED565231.pdf

25.

Gilmour

A. F.

(2020). Teacher certification area and the academic outcomes of students with learning disabilities or emotional/behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919849905

26.

Harris

D. N.

Sass

T. R.

(2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812.

27.

Hill

H. C.

Ball

D. L.

Schilling

S. G.

(2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 372–400. www.jstor.org/stable/4053930

28.

Hock

Isenberg

(2017). Methods for accounting for co-teaching in value-added models. Statistics and Public Policy, 4(1), 1–11.

29.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (2004). 20 U.S. C. § 1401–1430.

30.

Jitendra

A. K.

Lein

A. E.

S. H.

Alghamdi

A. A.

Hefte

S. B.

Mouanoutoua

(2018). Mathematical interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities and mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 177–196.

31.

Jones

Winters

M. A.

(2020). Are two teachers better than one? The effect of co-teaching on students with and without disabilities (Working Paper). http://sites.bu.edu/voise/files/2020/06/Effect-of-Co-Teaching.pdf

32.

Kraft

M. A.

(2018). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions (Working Papers). Brown University.

33.

Louie

Brodesky

Brett

Yang

L. M.

Tan

(2008). Math education practices for students with disabilities and other struggling learners: Case studies of six schools in Two Northeast and Islands Region States (REL 2008-No. 053). Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands.

34.

Mason-Williams

Bettini

Gagnon

J. C.

(2017). Access to qualified special educators across elementary neighborhood and exclusionary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 38(5), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517713311

35.

Masyn

K. E.

(2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In Little

T. D.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press.

36.

Myers

J.A.

(2019). Teacher qualifications and student mathematics achievement in Grades 6 through 12: An exploratory study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida. http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0054546/00001

37.

Myers

J. A.

Brownell

M. T.

Griffin

C. C.

Hughes

E. M.

Witzel

B. S.

Gage

N. A.

Peyton

Acosta

Wang

(2021). Mathematics interventions for adolescents with mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12244

38.

Nelson

Powell

S. R.

(2018). Computation error analysis: Students with mathematics difficulty compared to typically achieving students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 43(3), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508417745627

39.

Nylund

K. L.

Asparouhov

Muthén

B. O.

(2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569.

40.

Nylund-Gibson

Masyn

K. E.

(2016). Covariates and mixture modeling: Results of a simulation study exploring the impact of misspecified effects on class enumeration. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(6), 782–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1221313

41.

Ojha

V. K.

Jackowski

Abraham

Snášel

(2015). Dimensionality reduction, and function approximation of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) micro-and nanoparticle dissolution rate. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 10, 1119–1129.

42.

Ram

Grimm

K. J.

(2009). Methods and measures: Growth mixture modeling: A method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(6), 565–576.

43.

Rivkin

S. G.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

(2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x

44.

Ross

(2019). Ensuring equitable access to great teachers: State policy priorities. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(8), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721719846884

45.

Tein

J. Y.

Coxe

Cham

(2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824781

46.

Vermunt

J. K.

(2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18(4), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025

47.

Vermunt

J. K.

Magidson

(2016). Upgrade manual for Latent GOLD 5.1. Statistical Innovations.

48.

von Eye

Bogat

G. A

. (2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 390–420.

49.

Wayne

A. J.

Youngs

(2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122.

50.

Wei

Lenz

K. B.

Blackorby

(2013). Math growth trajectories of students with disabilities: Disability category, gender, racial, and socioeconomic status differences from ages 7 to 17. Remedial and Special Education, 34(3), 154–165.

51.

Witzel

B. S.

(2015). Bridging the gap between arithmetic & algebra. Council for Exceptional Children.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

Teacher Qualification Typologies and Their Relationship With the Math Achievement of Adolescents At Risk for Math Difficulties: A Latent Class Analysis Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material