The paraeducator workforce as well as the breadth of their responsibilities to serve students in special education has increased considerably in public schools. Unfortunately, research to identify the most effective methods for training paraeducators has not kept pace. Addressing this dynamic, through an implementation science framework, requires a better understanding of contextual factors. In this study, focus groups (FGs) with paraeducators and teachers were conducted to examine (a) responsibilities, training needs, and related issues of paraprofessionals; (b) training needs and related issues of teachers as supervisors of paraeducators; and (c) factors that support or impede special educators’ self-efficacy and their perception of competence of their colleagues. Four FGs, homogeneous based on role and assignment (mild vs. moderate-to-severe disabilities), were conducted utilizing a semistructured interview protocol. Qualitative content analysis revealed important challenges and training-related deficiencies experienced by both teachers and paraeducators, as well as suggestions for addressing these issues.
AbbottE. A.SandersL. (2012). Paraeducators’ perceptions of music therapy sessions. Music Therapy Perspectives, 30(2), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/30.2.145
2.
AllenM.AshbakerB. Y. (2004). Strengthening schools: Involving paraeducators in crisis prevention and intervention. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(3), 139–146.
3.
ArmstrongJ. (2010). How effective are minimally trained/experienced volunteer mental health counselors? Evaluation of CORE outcome data. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 10(1), 22–31.
4.
BertramR. M.BlaséK. A.FixsenD. L. (2015). Improving programs and outcomes: Implementation frameworks and organization change. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(4), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514537687
5.
BoyleC. A.BouletS. S.SchieveL. A.CohenR. A.BlumbergS. J.Yeargin-AllsoppM.VisserS.KoganM. D. (2011). Trends in prevalence of developmental disabilities in U.S. children, 1997-2008. Pediatrics, 127(6), 1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2989
6.
BrantlingerE. A.JiminezR. T.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
7.
BretonW. (2010). Special education paraeducators: Perceptions of preservice preparation, supervision, and ongoing developmental training. International Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 34–45.
8.
BrockM. E.Cannella-MaloneH. I.SeamanR. L.AndzikN. R.SchaeferJ. M.PageE. J.BarczakM. A.DuekerS. A. (2017). Findings across practitioner training studies in special education: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 84(1), 7–26.
9.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2016). Efficacy of teachers training paraeducators to implement peer support arrangements. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 354–371.
10.
BrownT. S.Stanton-ChapmanT. L. (2017). Experiences of paraeducators in US preschool special education and general education classrooms. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 17, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12095
11.
CantrellS. C.AlmasiJ. F.CarterJ. C.RintamaaM. (2013). Reading intervention in middle and high schools: Implementation fidelity, teacher efficacy, and student achievement. Reading Psychology, 34, 26–58.
12.
CapizziA. M.Da FonteA. (2012). Supporting paraeducators through a collaborative classroom support plan. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(6), 41–53.
13.
CarterE.O’RourkeL.SiscoL. G.PelsveD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities and training needs of paraeducators in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324399
14.
ConroyM. A.SutherlandK. S.AlginaJ. J.WilsonR. E.MartinezJ. R.WhalonK. J. (2015). Measuring teacher implementation of the BEST in CLASS intervention program and corollary child outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 23(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426614532949
15.
DouglasS. N.ChapinS. E.NolanJ. F. (2016). Special education teachers’ experiences supporting and supervising paraeducators: Implications for special and general education settings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 60–74.
16.
DowningJ. E.RyndakD. L.ClarkD. (2000). Paraeducators in inclusive classrooms: Their own perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 21(3), 171–181.
17.
EmeryD. W.VandenbergB. (2010). Special education teacher burnout and act. International Journal of Special Education, 25(3), 119–131.
18.
EtscheidtS. (2005). Paraeducator services for students with disabilities: A legal analysis of issues. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30(2), 60–80.
19.
EversW. J. G.BrouwersA.TomicW. (2002). Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teachers’ beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in the Netherlands. British Psychological Society, 72, 227–243.
20.
FisherM.PleasantsS. L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 287–297.
21.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
22.
FontanaA.FreyJ. H. (2005). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 695–727). SAGE.
23.
FormanS. G.ShapiroE. S.CoddingR. S.GonalezJ. E.ReddyL. A.RosenfieldS. A.SanettiL. M. H.StoiberK. C. (2013). Implementation science and school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(2), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000019
24.
FrenchN. K.PickettA. L. (1997). Paraeducators in special education: Issues for teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(1), 61–73.
25.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraeducators in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(1), 10–26.
26.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C.DoyleM. B. (2010). Paraeducators in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535356
HeggestadE.KanferR. (2005). The predictive validity of self-efficacy in training performance: Little more than past performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(2), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.2.84
29.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. x 1400 (2004).
30.
Johnson-HarrisK. M.MundschenkN. A. (2014). Working effectively with students with BD in a general education classroom: The case for universal design for learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(4), 168–174.
KlassenR. M.TzeV. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76.
33.
KoegelR. L.KimS.KoegelL. K. (2014). Training paraeducators to improve socialization in students with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(9), 2197–2208.
34.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
35.
KucharczykS.ReutebuchC. K.CarterE. W.HedgesS.El ZeinF.FanH.GustafsonJ. R. (2015). Addressing the needs of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: Considerations and complexities for high school interventions. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563703
36.
KuronjaM.ČagranB.KrajncM. S. (2018). Teachers’ sense of efficacy in their work with pupils with learning, emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 24(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2018.1530499
37.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
MalinenO.-P.SavolainenH.XuJ. (2012). Beijing in-service teachers’ self-efficacy and attitudes towards inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.004
40.
MartinN. K.SassD. A.SchmittT. A. (2012). Teacher efficacy in student engagement, instructional management, student stressors, and burnout: A theoretical model using in-class variables to predict teachers’ intent-to-leave. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.003
41.
MasonR. A.SchnitzA., G.WillsH. P.BastD.RosenbloomR.KampsD. M. (2017). Improving paraprofessionals procedural integrity: Impact of a teacher-as-coach model. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(6), 1696–1707.
42.
MilnerH. R.Woolfolk-HoyA. (2003). A case study of an African American teacher’s self-efficacy, stereotype threat, and persistence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 263–227.
43.
NieY.TanG. H.LiauA. K.LauS.ChuaB. L. (2013). The roles of teacher efficacy in instructional innovation: Its predictive relations to constructivist and didactic instruction. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12, 67–77.
44.
PattersonK. B. (2006). Roles and responsibilities of paraeducators: In their own words. TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus, 2(5), Article 1.
45.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
46.
PickettA. L.LikinsM.WallaceT. (2003). The employment and preparation of paraeducators: The state-of-the-art-2003. National Resource Center for Paraeducators. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED474398.pdf
47.
PurdyN.GuckinC. (2015). Disablist bullying in schools: Giving a voice to student teachers. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 15(3), 202–210.
48.
RupparA. L.GaffneyJ. S.DymondS. K. (2015). Influences on teachers’ decisions about literacy for secondary students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551739
49.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In WigfiledA.EcclesJ. (Eds.), Development of achievement (pp. 15–31). Academic Press.
50.
StockerR. D. (2009). Professional development for the underserved educator: Developing the paraeducator as an instructional resource [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington (ED513980)].
51.
TewsL.LupartJ. (2008). Students with disabilities’ perspectives on the role and impact of paraeducators in inclusive education settings. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 5(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00138.x
52.
ThoonenE. E. J.SleegersP. J. C.OortF. J.PeetsmaT. T. D.GeijselF. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 496–536.
WalkerV. L.DouglasK. H.ChungY. C. (2017). An evaluation of paraeducators’ skills and training needs in supporting students with severe disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 32(3), 460–471.
58.
WallaceT.ShinJ.BartholomayT.StahlB. (2001). Knowledge and skills for teachers supervising the work of paraeducators. Exceptional Children, 67, 520–553.
59.
Woolfolk-HoyA.HoyW. K.DavisH. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In WentzelK.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 627–654). Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
ZhangY.WildemuthB. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In WildemuthB. (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Libraries Unlimited.
