The prominence of paraprofessionals in the education of students with severe disabilities highlights the importance of ensuring special education teachers provide effective supervision and support. The authors conducted in-depth individual interviews with members of nine educational teams—a total of 22 teachers and paraprofessionals—to identify (a) the competencies they consider important for special education teachers to work effectively with paraprofessionals and (b) their recommendations for equipping teachers to develop these competencies. Participants identified 10 competencies addressing three areas contributing to balanced leadership: knowledge, skills, and dispositions. They also recommended eight avenues for leadership development spanning three broad pathways: university-based preparation, school/district support, and personal development. The authors’ findings suggest the need to embed development of these competencies within existing training and support programs for teachers. The authors offer recommendations for future research and practice targeting teacher development in these areas.
BerryA. B.PetrinR. A.GravelleM. L.FarmerT. W. (2011). Issues in special education teacher recruitment, retention, and professional development: Considerations in supporting rural teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30, 3-11. doi:10.1177/875687051103000402
2.
BiggsE. E.GilsonC. B.CarterE. W. (2016). “Accomplishing more together”: Influences to the quality of working relationships between paraprofessionals and teachers. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41, 256-272. doi:10.1177/1540796916665604
3.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195-207. doi:10.1177/001440290507100205
4.
CarnahanC. R.WilliamsonP.ClarkeL.SorensenR. (2009). A systematic approach for supporting paraeducators in educational settings: A guide for teachers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 41, 34-43. doi:10.1177/004005990904100504
5.
CarterE. W.O’RourkeL.SiscoL. G.PelsueD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 344-359. doi:10.1177/0741932508324399
6.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards. Arlington, VA: Author.
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
DrecktrahM. E. (2000). Preservice teachers’ preparation to work with paraeducators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 157-164. doi:10.1177/088840640002300208
9.
FisherM.PleasantsS. L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 287-197. doi:10.1177/0741932510397762
10.
FrenchN. K. (2001). Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 41-53. doi:10.1177/002246690103500105
11.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C.DoyleM. B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 41-57. doi:10.1080/10474410903535356
12.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400 (2004).
13.
JonesC. R.RatcliffN. J.SheehanH.HuntG. H. (2012). An analysis of teachers’ and paraeducators’ roles and responsibilities with implications for professional development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40, 19-24. doi:10.1007/s10643-011-0487-4
14.
LewisS.McKenzieA. R. (2009). Knowledge and skills for teachers of students with visual impairments supervising the work of paraeducators. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 481-494.
15.
MastropieriM. A. (2001). Is the glass half full or half empty? Challenges encountered by first-year special education teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 66-74. doi:10.1177/002246690103500201
16.
MaxwellJ. A. (2012). Qualitative research: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
17.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabil-ities. (1998). Learning disabilities: Use of Paraprofessionals. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
PickettA. L. (1986). Certified partners: Four good reasons for certification of paraprofessionals. American Educator, 10, 31-47.
21.
PickettA. L. (2007). A training program to prepare teachers to supervise and work effectively with paraeducator personnel (6th ed.). New York: City University of New York, National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals in Special Education and Related Services.
22.
SharmaU.SalendS. J. (2016). Teaching assistants in inclusive classrooms: A systematic analysis of the international research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 118-134. doi:10.14221/ajte.2016v41n8.7
23.
SteckelbergA. L.VasaS. F.KempS. E.ArthaudT. J.AsselinS. B.SwainK.FennickE. (2007). A web-based training model for preparing teachers to supervise paraeducators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 52-55. doi:10.1177/088840640703000106
24.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
WallaceT.ShinJ.BartholomayT.StahlB. J. (2001). Knowledge and skills of teachers supervising the work of paraprofessionals. Exceptional Children, 67, 520-533. doi:10.1177/001440290106700406
