This mixed methods descriptive study examined the effects of job-embedded professional development (JEPD) in reading on the content knowledge and instructional practice of teachers of English learners (ELs). Four first-grade teachers of ELs at one urban elementary school received JEPD over the course of a year. Results of pre- and posttests of teacher knowledge and classroom observations indicated that teachers’ reading content knowledge increased and that they used more evidence-based practices. JEPD shows promise as an approach that accommodates teachers’ varying levels of knowledge and experience in preparing them to meet the diverse needs of their students.
DuranE.EchevarriaJ.FrancisD.OlmedoI.SotoG.TinajeroJ. (2008). Tesoros de Lectura, a Spanish reading/language arts program. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
2.
BearD. R. (2007). Treasures: A reading/language arts program. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
3.
BurbankM.KauchakD. (2003). An alternative model for professional development: Investigations into effective collaboration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 499-514.
4.
BurkinsJ. M.CroftM. M. (2010). Preventing misguided reading: New strategies for guided reading teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, A Sage Company.
5.
CarnineD. W.SilbertJ.KameenuiE. J. (1997). Direct instruction reading (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
6.
CirinoP. T.Pollard-DurodolaS. D.FoormanB. R.CarlsonC. D.FrancisD. J. (2007). Teacher Characteristics, Classroom Instruction, and Student Literacy and Language Outcomes in Bilingual Kindergartners, The Elementary School Journal, 107(4), 341-364.
7.
CreswellJ. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181-199.
9.
DesimoneL. M.PorterA. C.GaretM. S.YoonK. S.BirmanB. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81-112.
10.
FordM. P.OpitzM. F. (2011). Looking back to move forward with guided reading. Reading Horizons, 50, 225-240.
11.
GalloY.GarciaM.PinuelasL.YoungsI. (2008). Crisis in the Southwest: Bilingual education program inconsistencies. Multicultural Education, 6(2), 10-16.
12.
GandaraP.Maxwell-JollyJ.DriscollA. (2005). Listening to teachers of English language learners: A survey of California teachers’ challenges, experiences, and professional development needs. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
13.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.KwangS. Y. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
14.
HawleyW.ValliL. (2000). Learner-centered professional development. Research Bulletin, 27, 7-10.
15.
JohnsonC. C.FargoJ. D. (2010). Urban school reform enabled by transformative professional development: Impact on teacher change and student learning of science. Urban Education, 45, 4-29.
Linan-ThompsonS.OrtizA. A. (2009). Response to intervention and English-language learners: Instructional and assessment considerations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 30, 105-120.
18.
McInerneyM.ElledgeA. (2013). Using a response to intervention framework to improve student learning: A pocket guide for state and district leaders: Implementing ESEA flexibility plans. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
19.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
20.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: Reports of the Subgroups (00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21.
PenuelW. R.FishmanB.YamaguchiR.GallagherL. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 921-958.
22.
PorcheM. V.PallanteD. H.SnowC. E. (2012). Professional development for reading achievement: Results from the Collaborative Language and Literacy Instruction Project (CLLIP). Elementary School Journal, 112, 649-671.
23.
StoverK.KisselB.HaagK.ShonikerR. (2011). Differentiated coaching: Fostering reflection with teachers. The Reading Teacher, 64, 498-509.
24.
Texas Education Agency. (2010). El Inventario de Lectura en Español de Tejas (Tejas LEE) Texas Primary Reading Inventory. Austin: Author.
