Few teachers receive adequate preparation to provide effective individualized instruction for children with intensive early writing needs. In this article, the authors describe an attempt to close this learning gap, by developing Data-Based Instruction-Tools, Learning, and Collaborative Support (DBI-TLC), a comprehensive professional development (PD) system that provides tools, learning opportunities, and ongoing collaborative supports for teachers to implement DBI in early writing. They describe the theoretical framework that has guided this work, the teacher population with whom they worked, their approach to assessing important teacher outcomes, and their development process. They highlight key findings that align with their theory of change, and discuss implications for further research and teacher preparation.
AllinderR. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86-95.
2.
BerningerV.AmtmannD. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 345-363). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BerningerV. W.NielsenK. H.AbbottR. D.WijsmanE.RaskindW. (2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Under-recognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 1-21.
4.
BiancarosaG.SnowC. (2004). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
5.
CunninghamA. E.PerryK. E.StanovichK. E.StanovichP. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 139-167.
6.
CutlerL.GrahamS. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907-919.
7.
DanielsonL.RosenquistC. (2014). Introduction to the TEC special issue on data-based individualization. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 6-12. doi:10.1177/0040059914522965
8.
DenoS. L. (1990). Individual differences and individual difference: The essential difference of special education. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 160-173.
9.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
10.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181-199.
11.
EspinC. A.WaymanM. M.DenoS. L.McMasterK. L.de RooijM. (in press). Data-based decision-making: Developing a method for capturing teachers’ understanding of CBM graphs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(1), 8-21. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12123
12.
FuchsL. S.DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14-20.
14.
GibsonS.DemboM. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
15.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.FinkB.MacArthurC. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: A construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 177-202.
GrahamS.HebertM. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation.
18.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445-476.
19.
HamptonD. D.LembkeE. S. (2016). Examining the technical adequacy of progress monitoring using early writing curriculum-based measures. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32, 336-352.
20.
HreskoW. P.HerronS. R.PeakP. K.HicksD. L. (2012). Test of Early Written Language (TEWL-3). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
21.
LembkeE.DenoS. L.HallK. (2003). Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3-4), 23-35.
22.
McMasterK. L.DuX.PétursdóttirA. L. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 41-60.
23.
McMasterK. L.DuX.YeoS.DenoS. L.ParkerD.EllisT. (2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77, 185-206.
24.
McMasterK. L.KunkelA.ShinJ.JungP.LembkeL. (in press). Early writing intervention: A best-evidence synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 0022219417708169
25.
McMasterK. L.LembkeE.ShinJ. (2016). Technical report for the pilot study: DBI-TLC. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
26.
McMasterK. L.RitcheyK. D.LembkeE. (2011). Curriculum-based measurement for beginning writers: Recent developments and future directions. In ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Assessment and intervention: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 24, pp. 111-148). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
27.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
28.
PochA. L.McMasterK.LembkeE. (2016). Feasibility technical report: DBI-TLC. Columbia: University of Missouri.
29.
PochA. L.SmithR. A.JungP.WagnerK.LembkeE.McMasterK. (in preparation). Using academic coaching to support teachers’ use of data based instruction: A review of the literature.
30.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
RitcheyK. D.CokerD. L.Jr.JacksonA. F. (2015). The relationship between early elementary teachers’ instructional practices and theoretical orientations and students’ growth in writing. Reading and Writing, 28, 1333-1354.
32.
ShanahanT. (2004). Overcoming the dominance of communication. In Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 59-74). New York: Guilford Press.
33.
Spear-SwerlingL. (2009). A literacy tutoring experience for prospective special educators and struggling second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 431-443.
34.
Spear-SwerlingL.ZibulskyJ. (2014). Making time for literacy: Teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading and Writing, 27, 1353-1378.
35.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795-819.
36.
TroiaG. A.LinS. J. C.CohenS.MonroeB. W. (2011). A year in the writing workshop. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 155-182.
