This analysis of the Special Education edTPA is written by two professors who co-taught a student teaching seminar at one institution and supported the first groups of teacher candidates required to submit the edTPA for certification in New York State. Data were gathered over three semesters and included open-ended student surveys, student journals, and public documents. Findings describe (a) how the edTPA requirements impacted teacher candidate learning, (b) the emphasis on one focus learner in the exam, (c) the discourse and language demands in the edTPA, and (d) how the edTPA and videotaping impacted fieldwork. We describe these findings and discuss their implications for inclusive and Special Education as understood through a disability studies in education perspective.
AllanJ.SleeR. (2008). Doing inclusive education research. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
2.
BaconJ.BlachmanS. (2016). A disability studies in education analysis of the special education edTPA understood through student and faculty perspectives. In CarterJ.LochteH. (Eds.), Teacher performance assessment and accountability reforms: The impacts of edTPA on teaching and schools (pp. 157-176). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
3.
BaglieriS.ShapiroA. (2012). Disability studies and the inclusive classroom: Critical perspectives for creating least restrictive attitudes. New York, NY: Routledge.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
CloughP.CorbettJ. (2000). Theories of inclusive education: A student’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
7.
CosierM.Causton-TheoharisJ.TheoharisG. (2013). Does access matter? Time in general education and achievement for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 323-332.
8.
CowleyD.BaconJ. (2013). Self-determination in schools: Reconstructing the concept through a disability studies framework. Power Play: A Journal of Educational Justice, 5, 463-489.
9.
CronenbergS.JohnsonD.JonesA.KorsonS.MurrayN.ParrishM.Johnston-ParsonsM. (2016). Trouble with the edTPA: Sliding from teaching to preparing for the test. The Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 8(1), Article7.
10.
DanforthS.GabelS. (2006). Introduction. In DanforthS.GabelS. (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
11.
DavisL. (2006). Constructing normalcy: The bell curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the nineteenth century. In LennardD. (Ed.), The disability studies reader (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
12.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998). A practical guide for teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
13.
FisherM.MeyerL. (2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 27, 165-174.
14.
FriendM.CookL.Hurley-ChamberlainD.ShambergerC. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9-27.
15.
LedwellK.OylerC. (2016). Unstandardized responses to a “standardized” test: The edTPA as gatekeeper and curriculum change agent. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 120-134.
16.
McCallZ.McHattonP. A.ShealeyM. W. (2014). Special education teacher candidate assessment: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 51-70.
PugachM.C.PeckC. (2016). Dividing practices: Preservice teacher quality assessment and the (re)production of relations between general and special education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 43(3), 3-23.
20.
RyndakD. L.TaubD.JorgensenC. M.Gonsier-GerdinJ.ArndtK.. . . AllcockH. (2014). Policy and the impact on placement, involvement and progress in general education: Critical issues that require rectification. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39(1), 65-74.
21.
SmithP.RoutelC. (2010). Transition failure: The cultural bias of self-determination and the journey to adulthood for people with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(1), 175-182.
22.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning & Equity. (2015). edTPA Summary Report. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
23.
Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning & Equity. (2016). Special Education edTPA Handbook. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
24.
TaylorS. (2006). Before it had a name: Exploring the historical roots of disability studies in education. In DanforthS.GabelS. (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
