The Affordances and Constraints of Special Education Initial Teacher Licensure Policy for Teacher Preparation

Abstract

Initial licensure polices in special education were examined to determine how these policies support or hinder reform efforts to develop teacher education programs that prepare graduates for the increasingly complex needs of diverse students. Initial special education licensure policies are described with an emphasis on the differences across states on two key options: whether licensure for special education teachers is a stand-alone initial license or whether the state requires a general education license prior to obtaining a second license in special education. As the field grapples with how best to prepare both general and special education teachers who can teach to high standards for students with disabilities, the influence of these options is examined in relation to four contemporary issues facing special education and the trade-offs that accrue when a particular licensure option is adopted.

Keywords

certification/licensure teacher preparation policy/service delivery teacher learning high-incidence disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell

S. M.

Coleman

M. B.

Cihak

D. F.

Kirk

E. R.

Barkdoll

Grim

Benner

(2010). How prepared are alternatively licensed special educators? An investigation of university, local education agency, and traditional preparation? Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 4, 33-49.

Blanton

L. P.

Pugach

M. C.

(2007). Collaborative programs in general and special education: An action guide for higher education and state policy makers. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from www.aacte.org/index.php?/Traditional-Media/Resources/collaborative-programs-in-general-and-special-teacher-education-an-action-guide-for-higher-education-and-state-policy-makers.html

Blanton

L. P.

Pugach

M. C.

(2011). Using a classification system to probe the meaning of dual licensure in general and special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 219-234.

Brownell

M. T.

Sindelar

P. T.

Kiely

M. T.

Danielson

L. C.

(2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357-377.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673-682.

Council of Chief State School Officers, & Collaboration for Effective Educator Development Center. (2015). Promises to keep: Transforming educator preparation to better serve a diverse range of learners. Washington, DC: Author.

Darling-Hammond

Holtzman

D. J.

Gaitlin

S. J.

Heilig

J. V.

(2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1-51.

Feng

Sass

T. R.

(2010, June). What makes special education teachers special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.

Geiger

W. L.

Crutchfield

M. D.

Mainzer

(2003). The status of licensure of special education teachers in the 21st century (COPSSE Document No. RS-7). Gainesville: University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education, U.S. Office of Special Education Programs.

10.

Geiger

W. L.

Mickelson

A. M.

McKeown

Barton

Kleinhammer-Tramill

Steinbrecher

T. D.

(2014). Patterns of licensure for special education teachers. In Sindelar

P. D.

McCray

E. D.

Brownell

M. T.

Lignugaris/Kraft

(Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 30-46). New York, NY: Routledge.

11.

Haager

Vaughn

(2013). The common core state standards and reading: Interpretations and implications for elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 5-16.

12.

Harris

D. N.

Sass

T. R.

(2008). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.

13.

Hemphill

F. C.

Vanneman

(2012). Achievement gaps: How Hispanic and White Students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (Statistical Analysis Report, NCES 2012-459). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

14.

Johnson

D. R.

Thurlow

M. L.

Schuelka

M. J.

(2012). Diploma options, graduation requirements, and exit exams for youth with disabilities: 2011 national study (Technical Report 62). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Tech62/TechnicalReport62.pdf

15.

Jones

N. D.

Youngs

Frank

K. A.

(2013). The role of school-based colleagues in shaping the commitment of novice special and general education teachers. Exceptional Children, 79, 365-383.

16.

Kaye

E. A.

, (Ed.). (2012). Requirements for certification of teachers, counselors, librarians, administrators for elementary and secondary schools, 2012-2013. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

17.

McLaughlin

M. J.

(2010). Evolving interpretations of educational equity and students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76, 265-278.

18.

Mclaughlin

Overturf

B. J.

(2012). The Common Core: Insights into the K-5 standards. The Reading Teacher, 66, 153-164.

19.

MetLife. (2011, May). The MetLife survey of the American teacher: Preparing teachers for college and careers. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/contributions/foundation/american-teacher/MetLife_Teacher_Survey_2010.pdf

20.

MetLife. (2013, February). The MetLife survey of the American teacher: Challenges for school leadership. Retrieved from https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/foundation/MetLife-Teacher-Survey-2012pdf

21.

MetLife. (April, 2010). The MetLife survey of the American teacher: Collaborating for student success. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED509650.pdf

22.

Naraian

(2010). General, special and . . . inclusive: Refiguring professional identities in a collaboratively taught classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1677-1686.

23.

National Council on Teacher Quality. (2013). State teacher policy yearbook: Improving teacher preparation national summary. Washington, DC: Author. Available from www.nctq.org

24.

Newman

Wagner

Knokey

A.-M.

Marder

Nagle

Shaver

. . . Schwarting

(2011). The Post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2011_09_02/index.html

25.

Noell

G. H.

Porter

B. A.

Patt

R. M.

Dahir

(2008, November 17). Value added assessment of teacher preparation in Louisiana: 2004-2005 to 2006-2007. Retrieved from http://www.laregentsarchive.com/Academic/TE/2008/Final%20Value-Added%20Report%20(12.02.08).pdf

26.

Pugach

M. C.

Blanton

L. P.

(2012). Enacting diversity in dual certification programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 254-267.

27.

Pugach

M. C.

Blanton

L. P.

Boveda

(2014). Working together: Research on the preparation of general education and special education teachers for inclusion and collaboration. In Sindelar

P. D.

McCray

E. D.

Brownell

M. T.

Lignugaris/Kraft

(Eds.), Handbook for Research on Special Education Teacher Preparation (pp. 143-160). New York, NY: Routledge.

28.

Pugach

M. C.

Blanton

L. P.

Florian

(2012). Unsettling conversations: Diversity and disability in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 235-236.

29.

Rock

M. L.

Spooner

Nagro

Vasquez

Dunn

Leko

. . . Jones

J. L.

(2016). 21st century change drivers: Considerations for constructing transformative models of special education teacher development. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39, 98-120.

30.

Seidl

Pugach

(2009). Support and teaching in the vulnerable moments: Preparing special educators for diversity. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 11(2), 1-19.

31.

Thurlow

Quenemoen

Altman

Cuthbert

(2008). Trends in the participation and performance of students with disabilities (Technical Report 50). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Tech50/TR50report.pdf

32.

U.S. Department of Education. (2013, April). Preparing and credentialing the nation’s teachers: The secretary’s ninth report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://title2.ed.gov/TitleIIReport13.pdf

33.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009, July). Teacher Preparation: Multiple Federal Offices Support Teacher Preparation for Instructing Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners, but Systematic Departmentwide Coordination Could Enhance this Assistance (GAO-09-573). Washington, DC: Author.

34.

Waitoller

F. R.

Artiles

A. J.

(2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes or a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83, 319-356.

35.

Wenglinsky

(2002). How schools matter: The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(12), Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/291

36.

Wilson

S. M.

Youngs

(2005). Research on accountability processes in teacher education. In Cochran-Smith

Zeichner

K. M.

(Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 591-643). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

37.

Young

K. S.

(2011). Institutional separation in schools of education: Understanding the functions of space in general and special education teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 483-493.

38.

Youngs

Jones

Low

(2011). How beginning special and general education elementary teachers negotiate role expectations and access professional resources. Teachers College Record, 113, 1506-1540.