Current political polarization and competing priorities complicate development of sound education policy. Particularly troubling is the disconnect between research and policy, as decision makers rely more on the work of think tanks and advocacy groups than the knowledge base of the profession. The mismatch between higher education and policy cultures is examined in terms of pace, career cycles, communication styles, information sources, and other factors. Implications for the scholarly community are discussed within a policy process framework with specific examples of effective advocacy. Recommendations include partnerships with strategic allies to gain resources and credibility, use of new communication styles and media, and preparation of leadership personnel for policy engagement.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2015). Proposed federal regulations for teacher preparation programs. Retrieved from http://aacte.org/resources/regulations
BakerB.WelnerK. G. (2012). Evidence and rigor: Scrutinizing the rhetorical embrace of evidence-based decision making. Educational Researcher, 41, 98-101.
6.
BerlinerD. C.GlassG. V. (Eds.). (2014). Myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
BirnbaumR. (2000). Policy scholars are from Venus; policy makers are from Mars. The Review of Higher Education, 23, 119-132.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14.
Educator Preparation Reform Act of 2012, H. R. 6447 S. 3582, 112th Cong. (2012).
15.
Educator Preparation Reform Act of 2013, H. R. 2172 S. 1062, 113th Cong. (2013).
16.
Equal Access to Quality Education Act of 2011, H. R. 2902, 112th Cong. (2011).
17.
Equal Access to Quality Education Act of 2013, H. R. 1334, 113th Cong. (2013).
18.
Equal Access to Quality Education Act of 2013, H. R. 2149, 114th Cong. (2013).
19.
Every Child Achieves Act of 2015, S. 1177, 114th Cong. (2015).
20.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, S. 1177, 114th Cong. (2015).
21.
FowlerF. C. (2013). Policy studies for educational leaders (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
22.
HenigJ. (2008a). The evolving relationship between researchers and public policy. In HessF. M. (Ed.), When research matters: How scholarship influences education policy (pp. 41-62). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
23.
HenigJ. (2008b). Spin cycle: How research gets used in policy debates—The case of charter schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
24.
HenigJ. (2009). Politicization of evidence: Lessons for an informed democracy. Educational Policy, 23, 137-160.
25.
HonigM. I. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26.
HonigM. I.HatchT. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33, 16-30.
LubienskiC.ScottJ.DeBrayE. (2014). The politics of research production, promotion, and utilization in educational policy. Educational Policy, 28, 131-144.
35.
LynnL. E. (Ed.). (1978). Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
36.
MalinJ.LubienskiC. (2015). Educational expertise, advocacy, and media influence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 6.
37.
MannaP. (2011). Collision course: Federal education policy meets state and local realities. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
McDonnellL. M.ElmoreR. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-152.
40.
McGuinnP. (2012). Fight club: Are advocacy organizations changing the politics of education?Education Next, 12(3). Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/fight-club/
41.
National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools. (n.d.). Home. Available from http://www.ncsecs.org/
42.
NessE. (2010). The role of information in the policy process: Implications for the examination of research utilization in higher education policy. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 1-49). New York, NY: Springer.
RavitchD. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
45.
RippnerJ. A. (2016). The American education policy landscape. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
ScottJ.JabbarH. (2014). The hub and spokes: Foundations, intermediary organizations, incentive reforms, and the politics of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28, 233-257.
47.
ScottJ.LubienskiC.Debray-PelotE. (2009). Politics of advocacy in education. Educational Policy, 23, 3-14.
48.
SmithD. D.MontrosseB.RobbS.TylerN.YoungC. (2011). Assessing trends in leadership: Special education’s capacity to produce a highly qualified workforce (Project No. 325U070001). Claremont, CA: Special Education Faculty Needs Assessment, Claremont Graduate University.
49.
SmithD. D.PionG.TylerN. C.SindelarP. T.RosenbergM. (2001). Final report: The study of special education leadership personnel with particular attention to the professoriate (OSEP Project No. H920T970006-00A). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
Student Success Act of 2015, H. R. 5, 114th Congress (2015).
52.
SundquistJ. L. (1978). Research brokerage: The weak link. In LynnL. E. (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection (pp. 126-144). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2009). Seclusions and restraints: Selected cases of death and abuse at public and private schools and treatment centers. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-719T
60.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015a). Pay for success: Collaboration among federal agencies would be helpful as governments explore new financing mechanisms. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/680/672363.pdf
61.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2015b). Teacher preparation programs: Education should ensure states identify low-performing programs and improve information-sharing. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-598
WeissC. H. (1978). Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. In LynnL. E. (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection (pp. 23-81). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
66.
WeissC. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39, 426-431.
67.
WelnerK. G.HincheyP. H.MolnarA.WeitzmanD. (2010). Think tank research quality: Lessons for policy makers, the media, and the public. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
68.
WestJ. (2014). HECSE pre-summit short course on education policy and politics. Retrieved from http://www.hecse.net/training/
69.
WestJ.StringerA. (2005). Internal memo on “Congressional citations of the shortage of special education faculty.”Washington, DC: Washington Partners.
WilsonJ. Q. (1978). Social science and public policy: A personal note. In LynnL. E. (Ed.), Knowledge and policy: The uncertain connection (pp. 82-92). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
