Supporting special educators’ sustained use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) is a priority for the field. In this study, the authors used multiple measures to evaluate the first graduated cohort from a university program 6 years after graduation with a master’s degree with a specialization in autism, and at least 8 years working as special educators, to determine whether they (a) remain in the field working with students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and (b) sustain effective practices. Survey and interview responses and content from viewed data sheets and graphs were summarized. All 12 graduates remain in the field. All continued to collect data for progress monitoring purposes and continue to use the EBPs identified by the National Professional Development Center (NPDC) on ASD with fidelity. All graduates indicated that the university program assisted in their capacity to implement and sustain their use of EBPs and attribute support from a community of practice as a sustaining factor.
BlaseK.FixsenD. L.DudaM. (2011, February). Implementation science: Building the bridge between science and practice. Presentation for Institution for Educational Sciences, Washington, DC.
2.
BoardmanA. G.ArgüellesM. E.VaughnS.HughesM. T.KlingnerJ. (2005). Special education teacher’s views of research-based practices. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 168-180.
3.
BurnsM. K.YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 3-11.
4.
CoxA. W.BrockM. E.OdomS. L.RogersS. J.SullivanL. H.Tuchman-GinsbergL.. . . Collet-KlingenbergL. H. (2013). National Professional Development Center on ASD: An emerging national educational strategy. In DoehringP. (Ed.), Autism services across America (pp. 249-266). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
5.
DurlakJ. A.DuPreE. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327-350.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.NaoomS. F.WallaceF. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 531-540.
8.
FixsenD. L.PaineS. (2009). Implementation: Promising practices to sustained results (Sustainability Series No. 5). RMC Research Corporation.
9.
FovelJ. T. (2002). The ABA program companion: Organizing quality programs for children with autism and PDD. New York, NY: Different Roads to Learning Books.
10.
FuternickK. (2007). A possible dream: Retaining California teachers so all students learn. California State University Center for Teacher Quality. Sacramento, CA.
11.
GoeL.BellC.LittleO. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
12.
HendricksD. (2011). Special education teachers serving students with autism: A descriptive study of the characteristics and self-reported knowledge and practices employed. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35, 37-50.
13.
HessK. L.MorrierM. J.HeflinL. J.IveyM. L. (2008). Autism treatment survey: Services received by children with autism spectrum disorders in public school classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 961-971.
14.
KlingnerJ. K.BoardmanA. G.McMasterK. L. (2013). What does it take to scale up and sustain evidence-based practices?Exceptional Children, 79, 195-211.
15.
MaddoxL. L.MarvinC. A. (2012). A preliminary evaluation of a statewide professional development program on autism spectrum disorders. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36, 37-50.
16.
McHughR. K.BarlowD. H. (2010). Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological interventions: A review of current efforts. American Psychologist, 65, 73-84.
17.
McLeskeyJ.BillingsleyB. (2008). How does the quality and stability of the teaching force influence the research-to-practice gap?Remedial and Special Education, 29, 293-305.
18.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
MorrierM.HessK. L.HeflinL. J. (2011). Teacher training for implementation of teaching strategies for students with autism spectrum disorders. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 119-132.
20.
National Autism Center. (2009). Evidence-based practice and autism in the schools. Author. Randolf, MA.
21.
OdomS. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 53-61.
22.
OdomS. L.Collet-KlingenbergL.RogersS. J.HattonD. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure, 54, 275-282.
23.
OdomS. L.CoxA. W.BrockM. E. (2013). Implementation science, professional development and autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 79, 233-251.
24.
RuefM. B.NefdtN.OpendenD.ElmensdorpS.HarrisK.RobinsonS. (2009). Learn by doing: A collaborative model for training teacher-candidate students in autism. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 343-355.
25.
SingerJ. D. (1992). Are special educators’ career paths special? Results from a 13-year longitudinal study. Exceptional Children, 59, 262-279.
26.
StahmerA. C.CollingsN. M.PalinkasL. A. (2005). Early intervention practices for children with autism: Descriptions from community providers. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 66-79.
27.
SuhrheinrichJ. (2011). Training teachers to use Pivotal Response Training with children with autism: Coaching as a critical component. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 339-349.
28.
TrivetteC. M.DunstC. J.HambyD. W.MeterD. (2012). Relationship between early childhood practitioner beliefs and the adoption of innovative and recommended practices (Tots-n-Tech Research Brief, Vol. 5, No. 1). http://tnt.asu.edu/research/briefs
29.
WengerE. C.McDermottR.SnyderW. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
30.
WengerE. C.SnyderW. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139-145.
31.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.. . . SchultzT. R. (2013). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill: Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina.
