Given the current climate of accountability, teachers must collaborate across disciplines to meet the diverse needs of students. Few, however, are prepared to collaborate in school settings upon completing teacher preparation programs. In this article, a participatory action research study undertaken by teacher educators who approached the lack of cross-disciplinary collaborations in two teacher preparation programs by developing and implementing a co-taught course on collaboration for general and special education teachers is presented. The described process was informed by interviews, observations, and analysis of course materials. Results contribute to the development of a framework for educator collaborations in higher education.
AmobiF. A. (2006). Beyond the call: Preserving reflection in the preparation of “highly qualified” teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33, 23-35.
2.
ApplebeeA. N.AdlerM.FlihanS. (2007). Interdisciplinary curricula in middle and high school classrooms: Case studies of approaches to curriculum and instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 1002-1039.
3.
ArthaudT. J.AramR. J.BreckS. E.DoellingJ. E.BushrowK. M. (2007). Developing collaboration skills in pre-service teachers: A partnership between general and special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 1-12.
4.
WeissM. P. (1999). Actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. 9935032).
5.
BoudahD. J.KnightS. L.KostohryzC.WelchN.LaughterD.BranchR. (2000). Collaborative research in inclusive classrooms: An investigation with reflection by teachers and researchers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 241-252.
6.
BrownellM. T.GriffinC.LekoM. M.StephensJ. (2011). Improving collaborative teacher education research: Creating tighter linkages. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 235-249.
7.
Brydon-MillerM.MaguireP. (2009). Participatory action research: Contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education. Educational Action Research, 17, 79-93.
8.
CharonJ. M. (1985). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Cochran-SmithM.DemersK. E. (2008). How do we know what we know? Research and teacher education. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD. J.DemersK. E. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 1009-1016). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
CooperJ. E.KurttsS.BaberC. E.VallecorsaA. (2008). A model for examining teacher preparation curricula for inclusion. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 155-176.
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
12.
CruzB. C.ThorntonS. J. (2013). Teaching social studies to English language learners (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
FraenkelJ. R.WallenN. E. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
14.
FriendM.CookL. (2012). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
15.
FullertonA.RubenB. J.McBrideS.BertS. (2011). Evaluation of a merged secondary and special education program. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38, 45-60.
16.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M.PullenP. C. (2012). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education. Boston, MA: Pearson.
17.
HardmanM. L. (2008). Redesigning the preparation of all teachers within the framework of an integrated program model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 583-587.
18.
ImigD. G.ImigS. R. (2008). From a traditional certification to competitive certification: A twenty-five year perspective. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD. J.DemersK. E. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 886-907). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
JacobowitzT.MichelliN. M. (2008). Diversity and teacher education: What can the future be? In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD. J.DemersK. E. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed., pp. 1009-1016). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
KluthP.StrautD. (2003). Do as we say and as we do: Teaching and modeling collaborative practice in the university classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 228-240. doi:10.1177/0022487103054003005
21.
Kochhar-BryantC. (2008). Collaboration and system coordination for students with special needs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson Education.
22.
LevineA. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
23.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
24.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.GraetzJ. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 260-270.
25.
McIntyreD. (2009). The difficulties of inclusive pedagogy for initial teacher education and some thoughts on the way forward. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 602-608.
26.
McTaggartR. (Ed.). (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. New York: State University of New York Press.
27.
MeltzerB. N.PetrasJ. W.ReynoldsL. T. (1975). Symbolic interactionism: Genesis, varieties, and criticism. Boston, MA: Routledge.
28.
NevinA. I.ThousandJ. S.VillaR. A. (2009). Collaborative teaching for teacher educators: What does the research say?Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 569-574.
29.
OylerC. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive and critical (special) education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 201-218.
30.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
31.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P. (2009). A framework for conducting research on collaborative teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 575-582.
32.
PugachM. C.BlantonL. P.CorreaV. I. (2011). A historical perspective on the role of collaboration in teacher education reform: Making good on the promise of teaching all students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 183-200.
33.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392-416.
34.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
StrykerS. (1987). The vitalization of symbolic interactionism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 83-94.
36.
TattoM. T. (1996). Examining values and beliefs about teaching diverse students: Understanding the challenges for teacher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 155-180.
37.
Van HoverS. (2008). The professional development of social studies teachers. In LevstikL. S.TysonC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 352-372). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
WineburgS.MartinD.Monte-SanoC. (2011). Reading like a historian: Teaching literacy in middle and high school history classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
