Efficient lesson planning with universal design for learning (UDL) enables teachers to more effectively meet students’ individual needs. In this study, a comparison of lesson plans by teacher candidates in a teacher preparation program before and after UDL training is presented. After training, teachers (n = 45) incorporated more differentiated options and varied teacher strategies based on UDL principles into their lesson plans, so that the content was more accessible to all students. A variety of changes and options was examined, and examples of commonly occurring choices selected by the teacher candidates were provided. The improved multiplicity of options in lesson planning demonstrates a better understanding of UDL principles; however, teachers need more experience in actually implementing the UDL principles in their classrooms.
BrownellM. T.AdamsA.SindelarP.WaldronN.VanhoverS. (2006). Learning from collaboration: The role of teacher qualities. Exceptional Children, 72, 169-185.
3.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357-377.
4.
BurgstahlerS. E.CoryR. C. (2008). Institutionalization of universal design in higher education. In BurgstahlerS. E.CoryR. C. (Eds.), Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice (pp. 23-45). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
CasperB.LeuichoviusD. (2005). Universal design for learning and the transition to a more challenging academic curriculum: Making it in middle school and beyond (NCSET Report). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED495873
6.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2009). Universal design for learning guidelines (Version 1.0). Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/udl/index.html
CoureyS.LePageP.SikerJ. R.BlackorbyJ. (2012). Engaging Preservice and Inservice Teachers In Middle School Mathematics: Using Dynabook to Shape Unconventional College Classrooms. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Austin, TX, March 5
The IRIS Center for Training Enhancements. (2009). Universal design for learning: creating a learning environment that challenges and engages all students. Retrieved from http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/udl/chalcycle.htm
11.
King-SearsM. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 199-201.
12.
KlooA.ZigmundN. (2008). Coteaching revisited: Redrawing the blueprint. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 12-20.
13.
McGuireJ. M.ScottS. S.ShawS. F. (2006). Universal design and its applications in educational environments. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 166-175. doi:10.1177/07419325060270030501
14.
MeyerA.RoseD. H. (2000). Universal design for individual differences. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 39-43.
15.
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (Eds.). (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
16.
RoseD. H.MeyerA.HitchcockC. (Eds.). (2005). The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
17.
RoseD.MeyerA.EdyburnD. (2008, April 3). Universal design for learning: Guidelines for practice and research. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children National Convention, Boston, MA.
18.
SamuelsC. A. (2007). “Universal Design” concept pushed for education. Education Week, 10, 1-12.
19.
SmithD. D.RobbS.WestJ.TylerN. (2010). The changing education landscape: How special education leadership preparation can make a difference for teachers and their students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 25-43.
20.
SpoonerF.BakerJ. N.HarrisA. A.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD. M. (2007). Effects of training in universal design learning on lesson plan development. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 108-116.
21.
Van de WalleJ.A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. (6th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
22.
Van GarderenD.ScheuermannA.JacksonC.HamptonD. (2009). Supporting the collaboration of special educators and general educators to teach students who struggle with mathematics: An overview of the research. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 56-77. doi:10.1002/pits.20354
