Connecting K—6 student outcomes with teacher preparation programs remains a critical need for the field. Even while educators have begun to sort through and document outcomes for teacher interns relative to national standards, the task of connecting performance to K—6 student outcomes has been little documented. In this interview study, the authors identify what mentor teachers associated with one urban teacher preparation program believe are positive student and associated mentor outcomes that result from student teacher participation in their elementary classrooms. The authors conduct a content analysis of individual interviews with 16 student teacher mentors, and use data from a teacher candidate focus group that addressed a subset of the teacher interview questions to triangulate this analysis. The authors discuss their findings in light of implications of the findings for teacher educators and how findings can be used for in-depth, follow-up studies.
Ayres, R., & Cuthbertson, L. (2004, July). Convergence and divergence of early career teacher’s views of and responses to context in the classroom: Implications for teacher preparation?Paper presented at the Teacher Work Sample Emerging Best Practices Conference, Glenedon Beach, OR.
2.
Blanton, L.P., & Pugach, M.C. ( 2007, June). Collaborative programs in general and special teacher education: An action guide for higher education and state policy makers. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers .
3.
Brownell, M.T., Bishop, A.M., Klingner, J.K., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., Haager, D., . . . Sindelar, P.T. (2005, August). Defining and assessing the quality of beginning special education teachers: First steps, conclusions drawn, and challenges encountered. Paper presented at Inclusion: Celebrating Diversity?The International Special Education Conference of the Inclusive and Supportive Education Congress, Glasgow, Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.isec2005.org.uk/isec/abstracts/papers_b/brownell_m_2.shtml
4.
Brownell, M.T., Ross, D.R., Colón, E.P., & McCallum, C.L. (2003). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with exemplary practices in general teacher education (COPSSE Document Number RS-4). Gainesville : University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
5.
Cazden, C.B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6.
Cochran-Smith, M. ( 2003). The unforgiving complexity of teaching: Avoiding simplicity in the age of accountability. Journal of Teacher Education , 54, 3-5.
7.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. ( 2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice . In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development in practice (pp. 45-60). New York, NY : Teachers College Press.
8.
Creswell, J.W. ( 2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson /Merrill Prentice Hall.
9.
Decker, P.T., Mayer, D.P., & Glazerman, S. (June, 2004). The effects of Teach for America on students: Findings from a national evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
10.
Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. ( 2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Florio-Ruane, S. ( 2002). More light: An argument for complexity in studies of teaching and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education , 53, 205-215.
12.
Friend, M., & Cook, L. ( 2010). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
13.
Gee, J.P. ( 2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
Goe, L. ( 2006). The teacher preparation > teacher practices > student outcomes relationship in special education: Missing links and next steps. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
15.
Knight, S.L., Owens, E.W., & Waxman, H.C. ( 1991). Comparing the classroom learning environments of traditionally and alternatively certified teachers. Action in Teacher Education , 12(4), 29-34.
16.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D.C. (2002, September 6). The effectiveness of "Teach for America" and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/316
17.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. ( 1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Lortie, D. ( 1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Maheady, L., Jabot, M., Rey, J., & Michielli-Pendl, J. (2007). An early field-based experience and its impact on pre-service candidates’ teaching practice and their pupils’ outcomes. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30, 24-33.
20.
Miller, J.W., McKenna, M.C., & McKenna, B.A., (1998). A comparison of alternatively and traditionally prepared teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 165-176.
21.
Parker-Katz, M., & Tejero Hughes, M. (2008). Preparing special education mentors using classroom artifacts as a vehicle for learning about teaching . Teacher Education and Special Education, 31, 268-282.
22.
Pugach, M.C. ( 1992). Uncharted territory: Research on the socialization of special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 133-147.
23.
Schalock, D., Schalock, M., & Girod, G. ( 1997). Teacher work sample methodology as used at Western Oregon University. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measurement? (pp. 15-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
24.
Shulman, L.S. ( 1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
25.
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Thompson-Grove, G. ( 2000). ATLAS-Learning from student work. Protocol revised for the National School Reform Faculty. Retrieved from http://www.nsrfharmony.org/protocol/doc/atlas_lfsw.pdf
27.
Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 190-204.
28.
Wineburg, M.S. ( 2006). Evidence in teacher preparation: Establishing a framework for accountability. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 51-64.
29.
Zeichner, K.M. ( 2005). A research agenda for teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith and K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 737-759). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association .
30.
Zeichner, K.M., & Conklin, H.G. ( 2005). Teacher education programs. In M. Cochran-Smith and K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 645-735). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
