In this study, the authors examine the influence of teacher and student communication patterns, instructional practices, and teacher pedagogical content knowledge on students’ mathematics learning in both general and special education mathematics classrooms. Five pre-service special education teachers in field placements and 43 students with varying disabilities participated in this study. Observations of teachers during mathematics lessons and follow-up interviews were conducted. Students in these settings completed a pretest and posttest of mathematics content taught over 6 weeks of instruction. Results reveal two sets of instructional practices, communication patterns, and teacher understandings of mathematics for teaching that differentially affected student performance. Implications are discussed for teacher education and further research.
Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. ( 2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51-73.
2.
Ball, D.L. ( 1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal , 90, 449-466.
3.
Ball, D.L. ( 1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
4.
Ball, D.L., Bass, H., & Hill, H.C. ( 2003). Knowing and using mathematical knowledge in teaching: Learning what matters. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
5.
Ball, D.L., Hill, H.C., & Bass, H. ( 2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?American Educator, pp. 12-22.
6.
Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The structuring of the structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice. In L. Steffe & J. E. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 137-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Baxter, J.A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. ( 2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 529-547.
8.
Baxter, J., Woodward, J., Voorhies, J., & Wong, J. ( 2002). We talk about it, but do they get it? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(3), 173-185.
9.
Bickmore-Brand, J., & Gawned, S. ( 1990). Scaffolding for improved mathematical understanding. In J. Bickmore-Brand (Ed.), Language in mathematics (pp. 43-58). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10.
Bottge, B., Heinrichs, M., Mehta, Z.D., & Hung, Y.H. ( 2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 186-200.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. ( 1992). Learning and interaction in classroom situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 99-122.
13.
Evans, J.F., & Policella, E. ( 2000). Changing and growing as teachers and learners: A shared journey. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 55-70.
14.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S.R. ( 2002). Enhancing first-grade children’s mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31, 569-583.
15.
Gawned, S. ( 1990). The emerging model of language in mathematics. In J. Bickmore-Brand (Ed.), Language in mathematics (pp. 43-58). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16.
Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. ( 1984). Direct instruction mathematics: A longitudinal evaluation of low-income elementary school students. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 395-407.
Griffin, C.C., & Jitendra, A.K. (2009). Word problem-solving in inclusive third-grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 187-201.
19.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. ( 1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity . In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially-shared cognition (pp. 331-348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M.K. ( 1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524-549.
21.
Hill, H.C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D.L. ( 2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406.
22.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 614 et seq.
23.
Jitendra, A.K., Griffin, C.C., Haria, P., Leh, J., Adams, A., & Kaduvettoor, A. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 115-127.
24.
Jitendra, A.K., & Hoff, K. ( 1996). The effects of schema-based instruction on the mathematical word-problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 422-431.
25.
Kagan, D.M. ( 1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers . Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129-169.
26.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. ( 2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27.
Kroesbergen, E.H., & Van Luit, J.E.H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-114.
28.
Kroesbergen, E.H., Van Luit, J.E.H., & Maas, C.J.M. ( 2004). Effectiveness of explicit and constructivist mathematics instruction for low-achieving students in the Netherlands. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 223-249.
29.
Kunsch, C.A., Jitendra, A.K., & Sood, S. ( 2007). The effects of peer-mediated instruction in mathematics for students with learning problems: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22, 1-12.
30.
Marshall, S.P. ( 1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York : Cambridge University Press.
31.
Martin, V.L., & Pressley, M. ( 1991). Elaborativeinterrogation effects depend on the nature of the question. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 113-119.
32.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
33.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: Author .
34.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 1606. 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
35.
Pape, S.J., Kaya, S., Irving, K.E., Owens, D.T., Sanalan, V., Ucar, S., Granade, S., & Abrahamson, A.L. (2006). Classroom connectivity in mathematics and science achievement: Classroom observation protocol-algebra I. Columbus: The Ohio State University .
36.
Perry, M., VanderStoep, S.W., & Yu, S.L. ( 1993). Asking questions in first-grade mathematics classrooms: Potential influences on mathematical thought. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 31-40.
37.
Schoenfeld, A.H. ( 2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31, 13-25.
38.
Shulman, L.S. ( 1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
39.
Shulman, L.S. ( 1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform . Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
SRA/McGraw-Hill (2003). Corrective reading. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
42.
Stevenson, J. ( 1998). Performance of the Cognitive Holding Power Questionnaire in schools. Learning and Instruction, 8, 393-410.
43.
Turner, J.C., Meyer, D.K., Cox, K.E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C.T. ( 1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 730-745.
44.
Turner, J.C., Meyer, D.K., Midgley, C., & Patrick, H. ( 2003). Teacher discourse and sixth graders’ reported affect and achievement behaviors in two high-mastery/high-performance mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 103(4), 357-382.
45.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Wilson, S.M., Shulman, L.S., & Richert, A. ( 1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104-124). Sussex, UK: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
47.
Wood, T. ( 1998). Patterns of interaction and the culture of mathematics classrooms. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Cultural perspectives on the mathematics classroom (pp. 149-168). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
