The Individuals with Disabilities Improvement Act mandates that every student with an Individualized Education Program be considered for assistive technology (AT). As a result, future special educators need to have the knowledge and skills regarding AT. In this article, the authors report findings from a national study of special education teacher preparation programs using archival document analysis on the current practice of AT course delivery for the preparation of special educators. Findings indicate that AT training at the pre-service level may not be adequately addressed. Approximately one third of undergraduate special teacher licensure programs, 28% of initial postbaccalaureate licensure programs, and less than 25% of master'sdegree programs require AT coursework. In addition, licensure in severe and moderate disabilities requires an AT course more frequently than other types of certification programs. The findings have important implications for future practices in special education teacher preparation.
Abner, G., & Lahm, E.A. (2002). Assistive technology implementation with students who are visually impaired: Teacher readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 96, 98-105.
2.
Alt, M.N., & Henke, R.R. (2007). To teach or not to teach? Teaching experience and preparation among 1992-93 bachelor's degree recipients (National Center for Education Statistics Report No. 2007-163). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3.
Bauder, D.K. (1999). The use of assistive technology and the assistive technology training needs of special education teachers in Kentucky school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky , Lexington.
4.
Bausch, M.E., & Hasselbring, T.S. (2004). Assistive technology: Are the necessary skills and knowledge being developed at the preservice and inservice levels? Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 97-104.
5.
Behrmann, M.M. (1995). Assistive technology training. In K. F. Flippo, K. J. Inge, & J. M. Barcus (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 211-222). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
Bryant, D.P., Erin, J., Lock, R., Allan, J.M., & Resta, P.E. (1998). Infusing a teacher preparation program in learning disabilities with assistive technology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 55-66.
7.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). What every special educator should know: The standards for the preparation and licensure of special educators (5th ed.). Reston, VA: Author.
8.
Derer, K., Polsgrove, L., & Rieth, H. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(2), 62-80.
9.
Edyburn, D.L. (2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities . Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(9), 1-23.
10.
Edyburn, D.L. (2002). Assistive technology and the IEP. Special Education Technology Practice, 4(3), 15-21.
11.
Edyburn, D.L. (2005). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities: From consideration to outcome measurement. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 239-270). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
12.
Edyburn, D.L., & Gardner J.E. (1999). Integrating technology into special education teacher preparation programs: Creating shared visions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(2), 3-20.
13.
Feistritzer, C.E., Haar, C.K., Hobar, J.H., & Scullion, A.B. (2005). Alternative teacher certification . Washington DC: National Center for Education Information.
14.
Games, P.A., & Howell, J.F. (1976). Pairwise multiple comparisons with unequal N's and/or variances : A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 113-125.
15.
Huefner, D.S. (2000). The risks and opportunities of the IEP requirements under IDEA '97. Journal of Special Education, 34, 195-204.
16.
Hutinger, P., Johanson, J., & Stoneburner, R. (1996). Assistive technology applications in educational programs of children with multiple disabilities: A case study report on the state of the practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(1), 16-35.
17.
Individuals with Disabilities EducationAct, Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C.A. § 1401, 1412, 1414 (2000).
18.
Individuals with Disabilities EducationAct,Amendments of 2004, P.L. 108-446. 20 U.S.C 1400.
19.
Judge, S.L. (2001). Computer applications in programs for young children with disabilities: Current status and future directions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16, 29-40.
20.
Lahm, E. (2003). Assistive technology specialists. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 141-153.
21.
Lahm, E. (2005). Improving practice using assistive technology knowledge and skills. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 721-746). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
22.
Lahm, E.A., Bausch, M.E., Hasselbring, T.S., & Blackhurst, A.E. (2001). National AT Research Institute . Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(3), 19-26.
23.
Lahm, E.A., & Nickels, B.L. (1999). What do you know? Assistive technology competencies for special educators. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(1), 56-63.
24.
Lee, Y., & Vega, L.A. (2005). Perceived knowledge, attitude, and challenges of AT use in special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(2), 60-63.
25.
Lesar, S. (1998). Use of assistive technology with young children with disabilities: Current status and training needs. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 146-159.
26.
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for the equality of variance. In I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essay in honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278-292). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
McGregor, G., & Pachuski, P. (1996). Assistive technology in schools: Are teachers ready, able, and supported?Journal of Special Education Technology , 13, 4-15.
28.
Michaels, C.A., & McDermott, J. (2003). Assistive technology integration in special education teacher preparation: Program coordinators' perceptions of current attainment and importance. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(3), 29-41.
29.
National Clearinghouse for Professions in Special Education (2006). Career choices in special education . Retrieved September, 15 2006, from http://www.specialedcareers.org/career_choices/preparation.html
30.
Puckett, K.S. (2004). Project ACCESS: Field testing an assistive technology toolkit for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), 1-12.
31.
Seevers, R., Martin, S., & Crawford, C.M. (2001). Assistive learning within a special needs environment. Proceedings of SITE2001, 2639-2641.
32.
Smith, S.J. (2000). Graduate student mentors for technology success . Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 167-182.
33.
Smith, S.J., & Jones, E.D. (1999). The obligation to provide assistive technology: Enhancing general curriculum access. Journal of Law & Education, 28(2), 247-265.
34.
SPSS, Inc. (2005). SPSS for Windows (Version 14.0). Chicago: Author.
