The national landscape of education and professional development is changing. Instructional personnel of students with severe disabilities are frequently untrained, professionally isolated, and in need of current knowledge and best practice in programming for these students. This article describes the need for a shift from a reliance on the workshop model of professional development to a more sophisticated and comprehensive plan that offers instructional personnel alternative forms of professional development based on the desired outcomes of learning and the complexity of the needed instructional innovation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baird, M. M. (1999). Legal issues in autism. Proceedings of the 20th National Institute on Legal Issues of Educating Individuals with Disabilities.Alexandria, VA: LRP Publications, Conference Division.
2.
Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms. What we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 2 (7), 501–508.
3.
Birman, B.F., Desimone, L., Porter, A.C., & Garet, M.S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 2 (8), 28–33.
4.
Black, S. (1998). Money and the art of staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 2 (2), 14–17
5.
Bos, C.S. (1995). Professional development and teacher change: Encouraging news from the trenches. Remedial and Special Education, 2 (6), 379–382
6.
Boudah, D.J., & Mitchell, V.J. (1998). The real thing: A tradition-breaking model, authentic professional development, shows encouraging results. Journal of Staff Development, 2 (1), 43–47
7.
Brand, G.A. (1998). What research says: Training teachers for using technology. Journal of Staff Development, 19 (1), 10–13.
8.
Brownell, M. T., & Smith, S. W. (1992). Attrition/retention of special education teachers: Critique of current research and recommendations for retention efforts. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2 (4), 229–248
9.
Corcoran, T.B. (1995). Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development. (CPRE Policy Brief No. RB-16-6/95). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (Available: www.ed.gov/pubs/CPRE/t61/index.html)
10.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 2 (5), 6–11
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Target time toward teachers. Journal of Staff Development., 20 (2), 31–36
12.
Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 2 (8), 597–604
13.
Ferguson, D.L. (2000). On reconceptualizing continuing professional development: A framework for planning.National Institute for Urban School Improvement. Retrieved June 18, 2000 from the World Wide Web: www.edc.org/urban/OP_Rec.htm.
14.
Ferguson, D.L., & Ralph, G.R. (1996). The changing role of special educators: A development waiting for a trend. Contemporary Education, 2 (1), 49–51
15.
Ferguson, D.L., & Ralph, G.R. (1997). Supportive school and community education program: Preparing supportive educators for students with low incidence and severe disabilities. University of Oregon: Center on Human Development Specialized Training Program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 983).
16.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depth of educational reform.London: Falmer Press.
17.
Fullan, M. G., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change.New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
Guskey, T.R. (1999). Applying time with wisdom. Journal of Staff Development, 2 (2), 10–15
19.
Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15 (5), 5–12
20.
Havelock, R.G., & Zlotolow, S. (1995). The change agents guide.New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.
21.
Heflin, L. J., & Simpson, R. L. (1998). Interventions for children and youth with autism: Prudent choices in a world of exaggerated claims and empty promises. Part II: Legal/policy analysis and recommendations for selecting interventions and treatments. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 2 (4), 212–220
22.
Horsley, D.L., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1998). Concerns-based adoption management (CBAM) brings order to the tornado of change. Journal of Staff Develop-ment, 2 (1), 17–20
23.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development (2nd Ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers, USA.
24.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1996). Staff development as a comprehensive service organization. Journal of Staff Development, 2 (1), 2–6
25.
Lane, G. M., & Canosa, R. (1995). A mentoring program for beginning and veteran teachers of students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2 (4), 230–239
26.
Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 2 (8), 591–596
27.
Little, J.W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2 (2), 129–151
28.
McGregor, G., Halvorsen, A., Fisher, D., Pumpian, I., Bhaerman, B., & Salisbury, C. (1998). Professional development for all personnel in inclusive schools. Consortium on Inclusive School Practices. Issue Brief, 3 (3), 1–12.
29.
Moffett, C.A. (2000). Sustaining change: The answers are blowing in the wind. Educational Leadership, 2 (7), 35–38
30.
Miller, M. D., Brownell, M. T., & Smith, S. W. (1999). Factors that predict teachers staying in, leaving, or transferring from the special education classroom. Exceptional Children, 2 (2), 201–218
31.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (1990, May). Special education faces a mounting crisis: How to recruit, train, and hold on to qualified teachers and related services personnel. Liaison Bulletin.Washington, DC: Author.
32.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching.New York: Author.
33.
National Staff Development Council. (1995). Standards for staff development: elementary school edition.Oxford, Ohio.
34.
P.L. 105-17. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997.
35.
Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 2 (7), 10–18
36.
Ryndak, D. L., & Kennedy, C. H. (2000). Meeting the needs of students with severe disabilities: Issues and practices in teacher education. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 2, 69–71.
37.
Sexton, D., Snyder, P., Wolfe, B., Lobman, M., Stricklin, S., & Akers, P. (1996). Early intervention inservice training strategies: Perceptions and suggestions from the field. Exceptional Children, 2 (6), 485–495
38.
Sparks, D. (1999). Try on strategies to get a good fit. Journal of Staff Development, 2 (3), 56–60
39.
Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 2 (7), 464–467
40.
U. S. Department of Education. (1998). Twentieth annual report to Congress on the implementation of IDEA.Washington, DC: Author
41.
U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). Toward better teaching: professional development in 1993-94.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved July 26, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/teaching9394/index.html.
42.
U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1996). Systemic reform: Studies of education reform.Washington, DC: Author.
43.
Westling, D.L., & Fox, L. (2000). Teaching students with severe disabilities (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
44.
Wilson, S.M., Peterson, P.L., Ball, D.L., & Cohen, D.K. (1996). Learning by all. Phi Delta Kappan, 2 (7), 468–474
45.
Yell, M. L., & Drasgow, E. (2000). Litigating a free appropriate public education: The Lovaas hearings and cases. The Journal of Special Education, 2, 205–214.
