As the number of culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) learners with disabilities increases in the United States, many educators and policymakers purport that teacher education programs (TEPs) must incorporate multicultural education more substantively. However, we know very little about the impact of multicultural education on the thinking and actions of preservice teachers. Moreover, we know very little about how changes in content and format affect their outcomes on evaluative measures. This study traces the conceptual change of 26 preservice teachers enrolled in an introductory special education course with a multicultural component. Concept mapping and comparative essays were used to analyze quantitatively and qualitatively which concepts the preservice teachers found most salient and specific. Results indicated statistically significant changes in the concepts the students' deemed most central and specific. Also, qualitative analysis revealed that students' post-maps were more complex than their pre-maps. Implications for research and practice are included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Artiles, A. J., Trent, S. C., Hoffman-Kipp, P., & Lopez-Torres, L. (2000). From individual acquisition to cultural-historical practices in multicultural teacher education. Remedial and Special Education, 2, 79–80.
2.
Artiles, A. J., Trent, S. C., Palmer, J. D. (2004). Culturally diverse students in special education: Legacies and prospects. In J. Banks & C. Banks (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education. pp. 716–735. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Banks, J. A. (1992, Fall). It's up to us. Teaching Tolerance, 2, 20–23.
4.
Banks, J. A. (1998). An introduction to multicultural education (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
Bos, C. S., & Fletcher. T. V. (1997). Sociocultural considerations in learning disabilities inclusion research: Knowledge gaps and future directions. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2, 92–99.
6.
Cochran-Smith, M. (1995). Color blindness and basket making are not the answers: Confronting the dilemmas of race, culture, and language diversity in teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 493–522.
7.
Davis, C. P. (2001). Pedagogical changes in a multicultural context: Journey of a University Professor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
8.
Engeström, Y. (1994). Teachers as collaborative thinkers: Activity-theoretical study of an innovative teacher team. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers' minds and actions: research on teachers' thinking and practice, (pp. 43–61). Washington, DC: Falmer.
9.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–36). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Ford, D. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 4–14.
11.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and Civic Courage.New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
Garmon, M. A., (1998). Using dialogue journals to promote student learning in a multicultural teacher education course. Remedial and Special Education, 2, 32–35.
13.
Gay, G. (1995). Bridging multicultural theory and practice. Multicultural Education, 3(1), 4–9.
14.
Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2000). On the threshold of a new century: Trustworthiness, integrity, and self-study in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 2, 234–240.
15.
Kalyanpur, M., Harry, B., & Skrtic, T. (2000). Equity and advocacy expectations of culturally diverse families' participation in special education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(2), 119–136.
16.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs.New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Kea, C. D., Trent, S. C., & Davis, C. P. (2002). African American student teachers' perceptions about preparedness to teach students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Multicultural Perspectives, 4(1), 18–25).
18.
Kinchin, I. M., Hay, D. B., & Adams, A. (2000). How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research, 42(1), 43–57.
19.
Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
20.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Morine-Dershimer, G., Saunders, S., Artiles, A. J., Mostert, M. P., Tankersley, M., Trent, S. C., & Nutty-combe, D. G. (1992). Choosing among alternatives for tracing conceptual change. Teacher and Teacher Education, 2, 471–483.
22.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1993). Tracing the conceptual change in preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 15–26.
23.
National Research Council (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24.
Pleasants, H. M., Johnson, C. B., Trent, S. C. (1998). Reflecting, reconceptualizing, and revising: The evolution of a portfolio assignment in a multicultural teacher education course. Remedial and Special Education, 19(1), 46–58.
25.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Townsend, B. L. (2002). “Testing while black”: Standards-based school reform and African American Learners. Remedial and Special Education, 2, 222–230.
27.
Trent, S., Pernell, E., Mungai, A., & Chimedza, R. (1998). Using concept maps to measure the conceptual change in preservice teachers enrolled in a multicultural education special education course. Remedial and Special Education, 2, 16–31.
28.
Voltz, D. L., Dooley, E., Jefferies, P. (1999). Preparing special educators for cultural diversity: How far have we come?Teacher Education and Special education, 2, 66–77.
29.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Thought and language.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
