This article describes three Web-mediated experiential case strategies employed with preservice teachers to facilitate practice of functional behavioral assessment skills. A pre-posttest group experimental design was used to examine the effects of three case-based teaching tactics on students' knowledge and application of information to conduct functional assessments. The results suggested that the three teaching tactics were equally effective in facilitating the application of functional behavioral assessment skills. However, there were some differences in the students' perceptions about the relevance and meaningfulness of their experiences as a means to teach functional assessment skills. Technology issues and other variables that could have influenced the results are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, L. (1997, February). Diversity: Changing perspectives using case-based methods. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Phoenix, AZ.
2.
Barnett, C., & Ramirez, A. (1996). Fostering critical analysis and reflection through mathematics case discussion. In J. Colbert, K. Trimble, & P. Desberg (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 1–13). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Bliss, T., & Mazur, J. (1996). Creating a shared culture through cases and technology: The faceless landscape of reform. In J. Colbert, K. Trimble, & P. Desberg (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 15–28). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Bronack, S. C., & Kilbane, C. R. (1998, March). CaseNET: Teaching decisions via a web-based learning environment. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Educational International Conference, Washington DC.
5.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Chicago: Rand McNally
6.
Clearinghouse for Special Education Cases. (2000). What is a teaching case? [On-line]. Available: http://cases.coedu.usf.edu/case_dev.htm
7.
Colbert, J. A., Trimble, K., & Desbert, P. (Eds.). (1996). The case for education.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
8.
Cunningham, T. H. (1994). Effects of combining case-based instruction and mindfulness activities on the acquisition, application, and transfer of complex knowledge: An experimental comparison of two multiple-case treatments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Logan.
9.
Gibb, G.S. & Egan, M.W. (2001). Guidelines for learner-centered evaluation of distance education programs. In Ludlow, B. and Spooner, F. (Eds.), Distance education applications in teacher education in special education (pp. 133–151). Terra Alta, WV: Pioneer Press of West Virginia, Inc.
10.
Greenwood, G. E. (1996). Using the case method to translate theory into practice. In J. Colbert, K. Trimble, & P. Desberg (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 57–78). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Kern, L., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Childs, K. E. (1995). Student-assisted functional assessment interview. Diagnostique, 2, 29–39.
12.
Knirk, F. G. (1991). Case materials: Research and practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(1), 73–81.
13.
Kraus, L. A. (1996). The effects of a case-based hypermedia environment: A research study examining behavior disorder knowledge acquisition, user learning styles, student-generated reports, prior computer experience, user time, and navigational patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
14.
Lebeau, R. B. (1997). Breaking the routine: Case-based learning and the development of clinical reasoning Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
15.
Li, T. (1997). Modeling and prompting for complex problem-solving and argumentation in a case-based learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
16.
Ludlow, B.L. & Duff, M.C. (2001). Guidelines for selecting telecommunications technologies for distance education. In Ludlow, B. and Spooner, F. (Eds.), Distance education applications in teacher education in special education (pp. 17–53). Terra Alta, WV: Pioneer Press of West Virginia, Inc.
17.
Ludlow, B. and Spooner, F. (Eds.) (2001). Distance education applications in teacher education in special education.Terra Alta, WV: Pioneer Press of West Virginia, Inc.
18.
Mioduser, D., & Margalit, M. (1997). TTIPSS: A computer-based system for training problem solving and educational planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(3), 1–13.
19.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1996). What's in a case- and what comes out. In J. Colbert, K. Trimble, & P. Desberg (Eds.), The case for education: Contemporary approaches for using case methods (pp. 99–123). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
Munro, J. H. (1997). Mastering the case method. Innovations in Education and Training International, 34(2), 84–91.
21.
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., & Sprague, J. R. (1989). The functional analysis interview. In R.H. Horner, J. L. Anderson, E. G. Carr, G. Dunlap, R.L. Koegel, & W. Sailor (Eds.), Functional analysis: A practical assessment guide (pp. 10–23). Eugene: University of Oregon Press.
22.
Ray, H., Baker, R., Kyle, J., & Goad, R. (1981). Research on student teaching: A question of transfer (Report No. SP 021 3201). Eugene: University of Oregon, Division of Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 223 561)
23.
Risko, V. J. (1991, October). Preparing preservice teachers for remedial instruction: Teaching problem solving and use of content and pedagogical knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the College Reading Association, Crystal City, VA.
24.
Rogers, R., & Reiff, J. (1989). Developing computer-based interactive video simulations on questioning strategies. Action in Teacher Education, 12(3), 33–36.
25.
Romiszowski, A., Mulder, M., & Pieters, J. (1990). The case-study methodology and instructional development. Instructional Developments, 1(3), 7–10.
26.
Rowland, C. (1998). Curriculum reform: The development of a curriculum template for applied problem-solving in distance education learning communities. Unpublished research proposal, Utah State University, Logan.
27.
Sebastian, J. (2001). Guidelines for instructor-learner interactions at a distance. In Ludlow, B. and Spooner, F. (Eds.), Distance education applications in teacher education in special education (pp. 121–132). Terra Alta, WV: Pioneer Press of West Virginia, Inc.
28.
Semrau, L. P., & Fitzgerald, G. E. (1995). Interactive case studies in behavioral disorders: Looking at children from multiple perspectives. Education and Treatment of Children, 18 (3), 348–359.
29.
Shulman, L. S. (1992). Toward a pedagogy of cases. In J.H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 1–30). New York: Teacher College Press.
30.
Smith, S. B., Smith, S. J., & Boone, R. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37–46.
31.
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J. J., & Friend, M. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 2, 17–22.
33.
Brownell, M., & Smith, S. (1992). Attrition/retention of special education teachers: Critique of current research and recommendations for retention efforts. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2, 229–248.
34.
Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1998). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. In E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.) Educating Students with Mild Disabilities: Strategies and Methods.Denver, CO: Love.
Friend, M., Reising, M., & Cook, L. (1993). Co-teaching: An overview of the past, a glimpse at the present, and considerations for the future. Preventing School Failure, 2, 6–10.
37.
Johnston, W. F. (1994). How to educate all the students. . .together. Schools in the Middle, 2, 3–12.
38.
Karge, B. D., McClure, M., & Patton, P. L. (1995). The success of collaboration resource programs for students with disabilities in grades 6 through 8. Remedial and Special Education, 2, 79–89.
39.
McLeskey, J., Henry, D., & Hodges, D. (1998). Inclusion: Where is it happening?Teaching Exceptional Children, 31 (1), 4–10.
40.
National Center for Educational Restructuring and Inclusion (1995). National study on inclusion: Overview and summary report.New York: Author.
41.
Nowacek, E. J. (1992). Professionals talk about teaching together: Interviews with five collaborating teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 2, 262–276.
42.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Phillips, L., Sapona, R. H., & Lubic, B. L. (1995). Developing partnerships in inclusive education: One school's approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 2, 262–272.
44.
Reinhiller, N. (1996). Co-teaching: New variations on a not-so-new practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2, 34–48.
45.
Sands, D. J., Kozleski, E. B., & French, K. (2000). Inclusive education for the 21st century: A new introduction to special education.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
46.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, California: Sage.
47.
Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (1989). Enhancing success in heterogeneous schools. In S. Stainback, W. Stainback, & M. Forest (Eds.), Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education (pp. 89–103). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
48.
Trent, S. C. (1998). False starts and other dilemmas of a secondary general education collaborative teacher: A case study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2, 503–513.
49.
U. S. Department of Education (1995). Seventeenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
50.
U. S. Department of Education (1999). Assistance to state for the education of children with disabilities and the early intervention program for infants and toddlers with disabilities: Final regulations.Washington, DC: Author.
51.
U. S. Department of Education (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.Washington, DC: Author.
52.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Arguelles, M. E. (1997). The ABCDEs of Co-teaching. Teaching Exceptional Children, 2, 4–10.
53.
Weiss, M. P. (1999). The actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. Unpublished dissertation: University of Virginia.
54.
Wood, M. (1998). Whose job is it anyway? Educational roles in inclusion. Exceptional Children, 2, 181–195.
55.
Zigmond, N. (1997). Educating students with disabilities: The future of special education. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
Artiles, A.J., Harry, B., Reschly, D.J., & Chinn, P.C. (2002). Over-identification of students of color in special education: A critical overview. Multicultural Perspectives, 4(1), 3–10.
57.
Artiles, A.J., & Trent, S. C. (1994). Overrepresen-tation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. The Journal of Special Education, 2, 410–437.
58.
Banks, J.A. (1989). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J.A. Banks & C.A. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives, (pp. 2–26). Allyn and Bacon: Boston.
59.
Banks, J.A. (2001). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
60.
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
61.
Gollnick, D.M., & Chinn, P.C. (1990). Multicultural education in a pluralistic society.Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
62.
Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., Gottlieb, B.W., & Wishner, J. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. The Journal of Special Education, 2, 453–465.
63.
Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development.Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
64.
Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs.New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
McIntyre, T. (1996). Does the way we teach create behavior disorders in culturally different students?. Education and Treatment of Children, 2, 354–370.
67.
Oswald, D.P., Coutinho, M.J., Best, A.M., & Singh, N.N. (1999). Ethnic representation in special education: The influence of school-related economic and demographic variables. The Journal of Special Education, 2, 194–206.
68.
Patton, J.M. (1998). The disproportionate representation of African Americans in special education: Looking behind the curtain for understanding and solutions. The Journal of Special Education, 2, 25–31.
69.
Valles, E.C. (1998). The disproportionate representation of minority students in special education: Responding to the problem. Journal of Special Education, 2, 52–54.
70.
Winzer, M.A., & Mazurek, K. (1998). Special education in multicultural contexts.Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill.
