The purpose of this inquiry was to describe the benefits and limitations of using two-way audio/video conferencing technology in a preservice teacher training program located in a remote area. Two-way conferencing technology was introduced on a trial basis to assist in the supervision of practicum students and student teachers in remote university distance education sites. A qualitative analysis was conducted using the university supervisor's field notes and the opinions of students and cooperating teachers as data sources. Some of the perceived benefits include: increased contact with on-campus personnel; opportunities for face-to-face interactions; and the chance to provide immediate feedback to field-based students. Limitations noted by the informants include: problems with the microphones; concerns about conferencing via modem and overcoming the initial fear of being on camera. The informants also offered suggestions for improving the technology and recommended other ways the technology could be used in a rural location.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anagal, J., Dobrowolski, N., Francis, B., Jr., Minner, S., Parish, T., Prater, G., & Winsett, E. (1996). Interactive instructional television: Education for rural areas (Report No. RC 020 577). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 778)
2.
Clawson, B. N., & Weiner, A. M. (1993). Two-way, interactive a/v applied to the supervision of student teachers. T.H.E. Journal, 2, 67–69.
3.
Council for Exceptional Children, (1999). CEC international standards for entry into professional practice (On-line). Available: http://www.cec.sped.org/ps/ps-entry.htm.
4.
Giebelhaus, C. R. (1995, February). Revisiting a step-child: Supervision in teacher education. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association of Teacher Educators, Detroit, MI.
5.
Kauffman, D. (1992). Supervision of student teachers (Report No. EDO-SP-91-7). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvements. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344 873)
6.
Keller, D. L., & Grossman, J. A. (1994, October). A model for improving the pre-service teacher/cooperating teacher diad. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
7.
Koskela, R., & Ganser, T. (1995, February). Exploring the role of cooperating teachers in relationship to personal career development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Detroit, MI.
8.
Koury, K. A., Ludlow, B. L., & Weinke, C. (1991, March). A collaborative approach to on-the-job practicum supervision of rural teachers. Reaching our potential: Rural education in the 90's. Rural Education Symposium, Nashville, TN.
9.
Lemke, J. C. (1994, March). Teacher induction in rural an small school districts. Paper presented at the 14th Annual National Conference of the American Council on Rural Special Education, Austin, TX.
10.
Lignugaris/Kraft, B., & Marchand-Martella, N. (1993) Evaluation of preservice teachers' interactive teaching skills in a Direct Instruction practicum using student teachers as supervisors. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2, 309–319.
11.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
McDevitt, M. A. (1996). A virtual view: Classroom observations at a distance. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 191–195.
13.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
14.
Meyen, E.L., Tangen, P., & Lian, C. H. T. (1999). Developing online instruction: Partnership between instructors and technical developers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(1), 18–31.
15.
Newman, J. W. (1998). America's teachers: An introduction to education (3rd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
16.
Page, F. M, Page, J. A., Warkentin, R., & Dickinson, T. (1994, April). Redefining student teaching supervision responsibilities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
17.
Robins, K. (1994, March). Multi-university consortium for teacher training: A model for pre-service training in rural areas. Paper presented at the 14th Annual National Conference of the American Council on Rural Special Education, Austin, TX.
18.
Russell, S. C., Williams, E. U., & Gold, V. (1992, November). Rural America institute for special educators: A collaborative pre-service teacher training program for rural special education. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, Cincinnati, OH.
19.
Sample, P., Lehmann, J., & Hyatt, J. (1996). Partners in transition: Preparing transitions specialists (Report No. RC 020 573). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 774)
20.
Thurston, L. P., & Sebastian, J. (1996). Technology and rural special education models and methods for preparing teachers (Report No. RC 020 567). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 394 768)
21.
Willis, B. D. (1992). Effective distance education: A primer for faculty and administrators.Fairbanks: University of Alaska Statewide, Distance Education.
