Virtual teams, using existing telecommunications technology, are employed by government and industry to meet the changing needs of the new millennium. The use of virtual teams by business has become part of the new workplace phenomena. Despite their obvious potential, virtual communications in Special Education are limited to electronic mail, video-conferencing, and discussion forums. The use of virtual teams in field of education is largely unexplored. The following is a description of a web-based, virtual, problem-solving process used by teams of Special Educators to address problems encountered by first year teachers. Assessment by team participants indicates that an in vivo problem solving and collaboration process was successfully replicated as an online phenomenon and a representative case, illustrating the process, is presented. A web-site, titled The Conference Room, is proposed as a model for building electronic bridges between teacher preparation faculty and their graduates and for offering confidential consultation, support and mentoring for first year teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, M., & Woodman, R. (1983). Review of research on team effectiveness: Implications for teams in schools. School Psychology Review, 2, 125–136.
2.
Bergan, J. (1977). Behavioral consultation.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
3.
Bergan, J., & Tombari, M. (1975). The analysis of verbal interactions occurring during consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 2, 209–226.
4.
Bork, L., & Fawcett, S. (1980). Learning counseling and problem solving skills.New York: Hawthorn Press.
5.
Brownell, M. T., Smith, S., & Miller, D. (1995). Attrition and special educators: Why they leave and where they go. Paper presented at the National Dissemination Forum: Special Education Teacher Satisfaction, Retention, and Attrition, Washington, DC.
6.
Carkuff, R. (1973). The art of problem solving.Amherst MA: Human Resource Development Press.
7.
Cherniss, C. (1988). Observed supervisory behavior and teacher burnout in special education. Exceptional Children, 2, 449–454.
8.
Curtis, M., & Watson, K. (1980). Changes in con-sultee problem clarification skills following consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 2, 210–221.
9.
Dixon, D., & Glover, J. (1984). Counseling: A problem solving approach.New York: Wiley.
10.
D'Zurilla, T., & Goldfried, M. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal and School Psychology, 2, 107–126.
11.
Eisenman, G., & Thornton, H. (1999). Telementoring: Helping new teachers through the first year. T.H.E. Journal, 2, 79–82.
12.
Fimian, M. J., & Blanton, L. P. (1986). Variables related to stress and burnout in special education teacher trainees and first-year teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2, 9–21.
13.
Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1996). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
14.
Giangreco, M., Edelman, S., & Dennis, R. (1991). Common professional practices that interfere with the integrated delivery of related services. Remedial and Special Education, 2, 16–24.
15.
Goodwin, D., & Coates, T. (1976). Helping students help themselves.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
Graden, J., & Bauer, A. (1992). Using a collaborative approach to support students and teachers in inclusive classrooms. In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students (pp. 85–100). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
17.
Gutkin, T., & Curtis, M. (1990). School based consultation: Theory and techniques. In C. Renolds & T. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 577–611). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
18.
Gutkin, T., & Reynolds, C. (1990). (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
Heppner, P., & Krauskoph, C. (1987). An information processing approach to personal problem solving. The Counseling Psychologist, 2, 371–447.
20.
Hobbs, T. & Westling, D. (1998). Promoting successful inclusion through collaborative problem solving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 2, 12–19.
21.
Hobbs, T., & Westling, D. (2000). Together and alone: A comparison of collaborative and individual inclusion planning. Issues in Teacher Education, 2, 9–38.
22.
Hope, J., & Hope, T. (1997). Competing in the third wave: The ten key management issues of the information age.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
23.
Ishaya, T., & Macaulay, L. (1999). The role of trust in virtual teams. Journal of Organizational Virtualness, 1 (1), 135–151 [WWW document]. URL http://www.virtual-organization.net/cgi//main.asp.
24.
Jayanthi, M., & Friend, M. (1992). Interpersonal problem solving: A selected literature review to guide practice. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 2, 147–152.
25.
Kaiser, S., & Woodman, R. (1985). Multidisci-plinary teams and group decision making techniques: Possible solutions to decision making problems. School Psychology Review, 2, 457–470.
26.
Kilgore, K., & Griffin, C. (1998). Beginning special educators: Problems of practice and the influence of school context. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2, 155–173.
27.
Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology.New York: Wiley.
28.
Maitland, R., Fine, M., & Tracy, D. (1985). The effects of an interpersonally based problem solving process on consultation outcome. Journal of School Psychology, 2, 337–345.
29.
Miller, M., Brownell, M., & Smith, S. (1999). Factors that predict teachers staying in, leaving, or transferring from the special education classroom. Exceptional Children, 2, 201–218.
30.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future.New York: Author.
31.
Nezu, A., & D'Zurilla, T. (1981). Effects of problem definition and formulation on the generation of alternatives in the social problem solving process. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2, 265–271.
32.
O'Neill, D., Wagner, R., & Gomez, L. (1996). Online mentoring: Experimenting in science class. Education Leadership, 2, 39–42.
33.
Porter, M. (1987). From competitive to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 2, 43–59.
34.
Phillips, V. & McCullough, L. (1990). Consultation-based programming: Instituting the collaborative ethic in schools. Exceptional Children, 2, 291–304.
35.
Pugach, M., & Johnson, J. (1988). Rethinking the relationship between consultation and collaborative problem solving. Focus on Exceptional Children, 2, 1–8.
36.
Pugach, M. & Johnson, L. (1989). The challenge of implementing collaboration between general and special education. Exceptional Children, 2, 232–235.
37.
Rosenberg, M., Griffin, C., Kilgore, K., & Carpenter, S. (1997). Beginning teachers in special education: A model for providing individualized support. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2, 301–321.
38.
Salend, S. (1998) Effective mainstreaming: Creating inclusive classrooms.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
Sparrow, P., & Pettigrew, A. (1988). Strategic human resource management in the UK computer supplier industry. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 2, 25–42.
40.
Tiegerman-Farber, E., & Radziewicz, C. (1998). Collaborative Decision Making: The pathway to inclusion.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
Weber, D. B., & Toffler, J. D. (1989). Burnout among teachers of students with moderate, severe, or profound mental retardation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2, 117–125.
42.
Wells, A. (1999). Distance proves no barrier to teamwork. NZ Infotech Weekly, 14 [WWW document]. URL http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe.
43.
West, J., & Idol, L. (1987). School consultation (Part 1): An introductory perspective on theory, models, and research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2, 388–408.
44.
Whitaker, S. (2000). Mentoring special education teachers and the relationship to attrition. Exceptional Children, 2, 546–566.
45.
Witt, J., & Elliott, S. (1983). Assessment in behavioral consultation: The initial interview. School Psychology Review, 2, 42–49.
