Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2001-10
Linking School Assessments to Research-Based Practices in Beginning Reading: Improving Programs and Outcomes for Students With and Without Disabilities
Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C.R. (1999). Research to practice: A "blueprint" for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65, 339-352.
2.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press .
3.
Adams, M.J., Bereiter, C., Brown, A., Campione, J., Carruthers, I., Case, R., Hirshberg, J., McKeough, A., Pressley, M., Roit, M., Scardamalia, M., & Treadway, J.G.H. (2000). Open Court Reading. Columbus, OH: SRA.
4.
Aukerman, R.C. (1984). Approaches to reading. New York: Wiley.
5.
Baker, S. (2000, June). Report on PALS focus groups. Unpublished Technical Report, Eugene Research Institute, Eugene Oregon.
6.
Baker, S., & Smith, S. (1999). Starting off on the right foot: The influence of four principles of professional development in improving literacy instruction in two kindergarten programs. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14, 239-253.
7.
Baker, S., Smith, S., Kameenui, E.J., McDonnell, M., & Gallop, S.M. (1999). A blueprint for bridging the gap between research and practice involving the Springfield Public Schools and the University of Oregon: Final Report for Grant number H023G50021. Washington, D.C: U. S. Department of Education.
8.
Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1976). Implementation of educational innovations. Educational Forum, 40, 345-370.
9.
Bond, G.L., & Dykstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5-142.
10.
Bruck, M., Genesee, F., & Caravolas, M. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early literacy. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp.145-162). Mawhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Chall, J.S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Chamot, A.U., Keatley, C., & Mazur, A. (1999, April). Literacy development in adolescent English -language learners: Project Accelerated Literacy (PAL). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
13.
Children's Educational Services Inc. (1987 ). Test of Reading Fluency. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
14.
Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
Crandall, D.P. (1983). The teacher's role in school improvement. Educational Leadership, 41(3), 6-9.
16.
CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1992). California Achievement Tests, Fifth Edition. Monterey, CA: Author.
17.
Deno, S., Mirkin, P.K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49(1), 36-45.
18.
Deno, S.L. (1986). Formulative evaluation of individual student programs: A new role for school psychologists. School Psychology Review , 15, 358-374.
19.
Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E. (1995). Reading Mastery I. Chicago : Science Research Associates.
20.
Englert, C.S., Raphael, T.E., Anderson, L.M., Anthony, H.M., & Stevens, D.D. (1991). Making writing strategies and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction in regular and special education classrooms . American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337-372.
21.
Espin, C. A., & Deno, S. L., (Eds). (2000). Research to practice: Views from researchers and practitioners [Special issue], Learning Disabilities Research & Practice (Vol. 15).
22.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 37-55.
23.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(3), 126-137.
24.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Burish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 85-91.
25.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.H., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal , 34(1), 174-206.
26.
Fuchs, L. (1986). Monitoring progress among mildly handicapped pupils: Review of current practice and research. Remedial and Special Education, 7(5), 5-12.
27.
Fuchs, L.S. (1993). Enhancing instructional programming and student achievement with curriculum-based measurement. In J. Kramer (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement (pp. 65-104). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
28.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22(1), 27-48.
29.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Kazdan, S.R., & Allen, S. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies in reading with and without training in elaborated help giving. Elementary School Journal, 99, 201-220.
30.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20-28.
31.
Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000, June). Applications of Levels of Use methodology: Sustainability analysis of two literacy innovations. Paper presented at the Office of Special Education Programs' Cross Project Sustainability Meeting, Eugene, OR.
32.
Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Lloyd, J.W. (2000). Designing high quality research in special education: Group experimental design. Journal of Special Education, 34(1), 2-18.
33.
Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors that enhance sustained use of research-based instructional practices: A historical perspective on relevant research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 444-457.
34.
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(5), 466-476.
35.
Gersten, R., & Woodward, J. (1992). The quest to translate research into classroom practice: Strategies for assisting classroom teachers' work with "at risk" students and students with disabilities. In D. Carnine & E. Kame'enui (Eds.), Higher cognitive functioning for all students (pp. 201-218). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
36.
Gersten, R., Woodward, J., & Darch, C. (1986). Direct instruction: A research-based approach for curriculum design and teaching. Exceptional Children, 53(1), 17-36.
37.
Good, R.H. (2000). DIBELS: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills [On-line]. Available: http://idea.uoregon.edu/∼dibels/ .
38.
Good, R.H., & Kaminski, R.A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision making for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11(4), 1-11.
39.
Greenwood, C.R. (1999). Reflections on a research career: Perspectives on 35 years of research at the Juniper Gardens Children's Project. Exceptional Children, 66, 7-21.
40.
Hall, G.E., & Loucks, S.F. (1981). Program definition and adaptation: Implications for inservice. Journal of Research and Development in Education , 14(2), 46-58.
41.
Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works . New York: Plenum Press.
42.
Jenkins, J.R., Vadasy, P.F., Firebaugh, M., & Profilet, C. (2000). Tutoring first-grade struggling readers in phonological reading skills. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15(2), 73-84.
43.
Juel, C. (1989). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
44.
Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215-227.
45.
Klingner, J.K., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Arguelles, M.E. (1999). Sustaining research-based practices in reading: A 3-year follow-up. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 263-274, 287.
46.
Klingner, J.K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J.S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 3-22.
47.
Lyon, G.R. (1994). Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. Baltimore : Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
48.
Lyon, G.R., & Moats, L.C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30(6), 578-588.
49.
Malouf, D.B., & Schiller, E.P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414-424.
50.
Marks, S.U., & Gersten, R. (1998). Understanding engagement and disengagement between special and general educators: An application of Miles and Huberman's cross-case analysis. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 21, 34-56.
51.
Marston, D. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: What is it and why do it? In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
52.
Moats, L.C., & Lyon, G.R. (1993). Learning disabilities in the United States: Advocacy, science and the future of the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 26(5), 282-294.
53.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
54.
O'Connor, R.E., Jenkins, J.R., & Slocum, T.A. (1995). Transfer among phonological tasks in kindergarten: Essential instructional content. Journal of Educational Psychology , 37(2), 202-217.
55.
Oregon Department of Education. (1998). Curriculum standards for education. Washington, D. C.: National Council for Social Studies.
56.
Oregon Department of Education. (2000). Background information about the Oregon Statewide Assessment [On-line] . Available: http://www.ode.state.or.us/asmt/results/1999/backgrnd.htm.
57.
Reschly, D.J., & Grimes, J.P. (1995). Best practices in intellectual assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 763-773). Washington D. C.: The National Association of School Psychologists.
58.
Rodden-Nord, K., Shinn, M.R., & Good, R.H. (1992). Effects of classroom performance data on general education teachers' attitudes toward reintegrating students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 21(1), 138-154.
59.
Rule, S., Losardo, A., Dinnebeil, L., Kaiser, A., & Rowland, C. (1998). Translating research on naturalistic instruction into practice. Journal of Early Intervention, 21(4), 283-293.
60.
Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.
61.
Shinn, M.R. (1989). Curriculuan-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
62.
Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: The Guilford Press.
63.
Shinn, M.R., Good, R.H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W.D., & Collins, V. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psycholagy Review, 21, 459-479.
64.
Shinn, M.R., Powell-Smith, K.A., & Good, R.H. (1996). Evaluating the effects of responsible reintegration into general education for students with mild disabilities on a case-by-case basis. School Psychology Review, 4, 519-539.
65.
Shinn, M.R., Tindal, G.A., & Stein, S. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement and the identification of mildly handicapped students: A research review. Professional School Psychology, 3(1), 69-85.
66.
Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E.J., Good, R.H., Harn, B., Cole, C., & Braun, D. (2000). Building, implementing, and sustaining a beginning reading model: School by school and lessons learned. OSSC Bulletin, 43(3).
67.
Simmons, D.C., Kuykendall, K., King, K., Cornachione, C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2000). Implementation of a schoolwide reading improvement model: "No one ever told us it would be this hard!"Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 92-100.
68.
Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Dolan, L.J., & Waski, B.A. (1996). Every cbild, every school: Success for All. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
69.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
70.
Sprick, M., Howard, L., & Fidanque, A. (1998). Read Well: A beginning reading program for first-grade, and remedial second and third graders. Longmont, CO: Sopris Press.
71.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(3), 360-406.
72.
Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277-321.
73.
Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 55-64.
74.
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J., & Hughes, M. (2000). Sustainability of research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 66(2), 163-171.
75.
Warren, S.F. (1998). Back to the future? Journal of Early Intervention, 21(4), 297-298.
76.
Wong, B.Y.L., Butler, D.L., Ficzere, S.A., & Kuperis, S. (1997). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities and low achievers to plan, write, and revise compare-contrast essays. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 2-15.
77.
Yopp, H.K. (1995). A test for assessing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 49, 20-29.