Carnine, D.W., & Gersten, R. (1985). The logistics of educational change. In J. Osborn, P.T. Wilson , & R. C. Anderson (Eds.), Research Base for Literacy (pp. 21-43). Boston: Heath.
2.
Colvin, G., Kame'enui, E.J., & Sugai, G. (1993). School-wide and classroom management: Reconceptualizing the integration and management of students with behavior problems in general education. Education and Treatment of Children, 16(4), 361-381.
3.
Cotton, K. (1990). School improvement series. Close-up #9: School-wide and classroom discipline. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
4.
Crandall, D.P., & Loucks, S. (1983). Executive Summary. In People, politics, and practices: Examining the chain of school improvement. Andover, MA: The Network.
5.
Fullan, M.G. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
Huberman, A.M., & Crandall, D. (1982). The practice profile: An all purpose tool for program communication, staff development, evaluation and improvement. Andover, MA: The Network.
7.
Kane, M.B., & Kocher, A.T. (1980). The dissemination and use of educational R&D in the United States: An analysis of recent Federal attempts to improve educational practice. Paper presented at the conference on "The Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge and Research: Toward New Scenarios."The Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria.
8.
Kennedy, M.M. (1991). Following through on follow through. In E. A. Ramp, & C. S. Pederson, (Eds.), Follow through: Program and policy issues (pp. 231-250). Washington, D C: Office of Education Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education .
9.
Lewis, T.J., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(6), 1-24.
10.
Little, J.W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325-40.
11.
Loucks-Horsley, S., & Roody, D.S. (1990). Using what is known about change to inform the regular education initiative. Remedial and Special Education , 11(3), 51-56.
12.
McLaughlin, M.W. (1990). The Rand Study ten years later: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 2, 11-16.
13.
Nelson, J.R. (1996). Designing schools to meet the needs of students who exhibit disruptive behavior. Journal of Emotional and Bebavioral Disorders, 4, 147-161.
14.
Nelson, J.R., Martella, R., & Galand, B. (1998). The effects of teaching school expectations and establishing consistent consequences on formal office disciplinary actions . Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 6, 153-161.
15.
Nelson, J.R., Martella, R.C., & Marchand-Martella, N.E. (in press). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing disruptive behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders.
16.
Osher, D., & Kane, M. (1993). Describing and studying innovations in the education of children with attention deficit disorder. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
17.
Schumaker, J.B., & Clark, F.L. (1990). Achieving implementation of strategy instruction through effective in-service education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 13(2), 105-116.
18.
Sugai, G. (1999, April). Overview of effective bebavioral support. Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. [Online] Available: http://pbis.org
