In 2008 an Austrian animal rights organization announced a boycott of Hungarian foie gras, arguing that force-feeding geese and ducks constitutes animal cruelty. The case received a lot of media attention and quickly evolved into a bitter conflict. The article scrutinizes the case as an example of postsocialist conflicts around ethics and morality and the concept of common good. The incident demonstrates not only unexpected obstacles for Hungary to be accepted as civilizationally European but also for Hungarian farmers’ ability to act as morally sovereign self-regulating subjects in a neoliberal world.
Bogenfürst, F.2002. Víziszárnyasok: májtermelö képesség és májminöség: Veszélyben a magyar libamáj-export? [Water fowl: Liver-producing ability and liver quality: Are Hungarian goose liver exports in danger?]. MezöHír6(1). http://www.mezohir.hu/2002-01/14.html .
2.
Brown, W.2003. Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory and Event7(1). http://muse.jhu.edu.proxy2.library.uiuc.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v007/7.1brown.html . Last accessed 22 June 2009.
3.
Caro, M.2009. The foie gras wars: How a 5,000-year-old delicacy inspired the world’s fiercest food fight. New York: Simon & Schuster.
4.
Clarke, J.2004. Dissolving the public realm? The logics and limits of neo-liberalism. Journal of Social Policy33 (1): 27-48.
5.
Csepeli, Gy.2009. Csöd és eufória-A rendszerváltozás politikájának fogadtatása a magyar társadalomban [Bankruptcy and euphoria: The Hungarian reception of the politics of regime change]. Paper presented at the conference Rendszerváltás 20-"szembenézés és párbeszéd" (Transition 20-"Confrontation and Dialogue"), Budapest, Hungary, 1989, June.
6.
Dunn, E.C.2005. Standards and person-making in East-Central Europe. In Global assemblages, ed. A. Ong and S. J. Collier, 173-93. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
7.
Élelmiszeripari Gazdaságtan Tanszék [Department of Food Economics].2009. A libamáj, mint örökség, gazdasági ágazat és termék: Fogyasztói kutatás a hazai hízottmáj-ágazattal kapcsolatban [Foie gras as heritage, economic sector, and product: Consumer survey on the domestic foie gras sector]. Budapest, Hungary: Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, Élelmiszertudományi Kar.
8.
Esbenshade, R.S.2006. The divided construction of Hungarian national identity in the populist-urbanist debate, 1930-1948. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
9.
Fraser, N.2003. From discipline to flexibilization?-Reading Foucault in the shadow of globalization. Constellations10 (2): 160-71.
10.
Gille, Zsuzsa. ( 2010.) Is there a global postsocialist condition?Global Society24(1): 9-30.
11.
Glass, J.2007. Foie gras makers struggle to please critics and chefs . New York Times, 25 April. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/25/dining/25foie.html?ref=dining&pagewanted=all .
12.
Kasza, G.y. 2008. Tömött liba: csakis múzeumban kitömve? [Fattened goose: Stuffed only in the museum?]. Unpublished paper.
13.
Lakoff, A., and S. Collier.2004. Ethics and the anthropology of modern reason. Anthropological Theory4 (4): 419-34.
14.
MacIntyre, A.1984. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
15.
Mincyte, D.2009. "I am not a farmer": The making of sustainable landscape in post-socialist Lithuania. Paper presented at the Rural Sociological Society annual meeting, Madison, WI, 31 July.
16.
Mincyte, D.2010. Subsistence and sustainability in post-industrial Europe: The politics of small-scale farming in Europeanizing Lithuania. Sociologia Ruralis, forthcoming.
17.
Nadkarni, M.2000. The "whisky robber": Criminality as a moral discourse in post-’89 Hungary. Anthropology of East Europe Review18 (2): 85-92.
18.
Papp, L.2008. Personal communication, Kiskunfélegyháza, Hungary.
19.
Rose, N.1996. Governing "advanced" liberal democracies. In Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government, ed. A. Barry, T. Osborne, and N. Rose , 37-64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Scahaw.1998. The Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (SCAHAW) opinion on welfare aspects for the production of foie gras in ducks and geese. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/international/index_en.htm (accessed 22 June 2009).
21.
Skrabski, A., and M. Kopp.2008. A bizalom mint a társadalmi töke központi jellemzöje [Trust as the central indicator of social capital] . Vigilia73(10). http://www.vigilia.hu/archiv.html (accessed 22 June 2009).
22.
Todorova, M., and Z. Gille, eds. 2010. Postcommunist nostalgia. New York: Berghahn Press.
23.
Tze-wei, N.2009. False hope as report barks up wrong tree; disappointment after misleading article in state newspaper on animal protection law. South China Morning Post, 16 June, 5.
24.
Vásárhelyi, M.2005. Csalódások kora-Rendszerváltás alulnézetben [The age of disillusions: Regime change from below]. Budapest, Hungary: MTA Társadalomkutató Központ.
25.
Vedder, A., V. Collingwood, A. Van Gorp, M.T. Kamminga, and L. Logister.2007. NGO involvement in international governance and policy: Sources of legitimacy. Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
26.
Verdery, K.1996. What was socialism and what comes next?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Zentai, V. n.d. A "culture of complaint": Social discourses on money and wealth in Hungary . Unpublished paper.
