Despite the criticisms of some sociologists that the Technical/Rational Model is too one-dimensional to capture the complexity of a social insti tution, scholars studying, evaluating, and recommending change in cor rectional organizations have historically utilized this perspective. This model ignores the equal, if not overwhelming, significance of culture and ideology in the evolution, operation, structure, resistance to change, and persistence of correctional organizations. Ignoring the cultural or ideo logical aspects of corrections confines our understanding to instrumental "action" related activities and results. This narrowly limits both our understanding of corrections as a "social institution" with a variety of functions in society and our ability to generate change in the organization so that it evolves with the society. This has resulted in two problems: 1) consistently negative instrumental evaluations of the organization and 2) resignation leading to reckless and unsuccessful change. Scholars in the sociology of punishment have enhanced our understanding of punish ment's place and development in society, repeatedly warning that culture and ideology are not secondary to instrumental action, that social institu tions both create and reaffirm culture and ideology. This article offers an alternative model for understanding correctional organizations which incorporates culture and ideology and may provide more useful evalua tions for policy decisions on change in corrections.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, S. (1974). Measurement of Effectiveness and Efficiency in Corrections. In D. Glaser (Ed.), Handbook of Criminology (p. 1021-1049). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
American Correctional Association (1973). American Correctional Association's Standards and Goals for Corrections. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Anderson, P., Davoli, C.R., & Moriarty L.G. (1985). Private Corrections: Feast or Fiasco? The Prison Journal, 65(2). 32-41.
4.
Bailey, W.C. (1966). Correctional Outcome: An Evaluation of 100 Reports . Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science , 57 (June). 153-160.
5.
Bowker, L.H. (1978). Women, Crime, and the Criminal Justice System . Lexington, MA: Lexington Books .
6.
Carleton, M.T. (1971). Politics and Punishment: The History of the Louisiana State Penal System. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
7.
Clare, P.K. & Kramer, J.H. (1976). Introduction to American Corrections. Boston: Holbrook.
8.
Crank, J.P. (1996). The Construction of Meaning during Training for Probation and Parole. Justice Quarterly, 13(2). 265-290.
9.
Cromwell, P.F. (1989). Quaker Reforms in American Criminal Justice: The Penitentiary and Beyond. Criminal Justice History: An International Annual, 10. 77-94.
Duffee, D. (1980). Correctional Management: Change and Control in Correctional Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
15.
Durham, A.M. III (1988). Evaluating Privatized Correctional Institutions: Obstacles to Effective Assessment. Federal Probation, 52(2). 65-71.
16.
Durham, A.M. III (1994). Crisis and Reform: Current Issues in American Punishment. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
17.
Durkheim, E. (1983). Two Laws of Penal Evolution. Chapter 4, The Evolution of Punishment in S. Lukes and A. Scull (Eds.), Durkheim and the Law (p. 102-132). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Ethridge, P.A. & Marquart, J.W. (1993). Private Prisons in Texas: The New Penology for Profit. Justice Quarterly, 10(1). 29-48.
19.
Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and Modem Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Hagan, J., Hewitt, J.D., & Alwin, D.F. (1979). Ceremonial Justice: Crime and Punishment in a Loosely Coupled System. Social Forces. 58(2). 506-527.
21.
Herrnstein, R.J. & Wilson, J.Q. (1985). Crime and Human Nature. New York: Simon and Schuster.
22.
Hirsch, A.J. (1992). The Rise of the Penitentiary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23.
Immarigeon, R. (1985). Private Prisons, Private Programs, and Their Implications for Reducing Reliance on Imprisonment in the United States. The Prison Journal. 65(2). 60-74.
24.
Jenkins, P. (1984). Temperance and the Origins of the New Penology . Journal of Criminal Justice, 12. 551-565.
25.
Johnson, E.H. (1968). Crime, Correction, and Society. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
26.
Kalinich, D.B. & Banas, D. (1984). System Maintenance and Legitimation: An Historical Illustration of the Impact of National Task Forces and Committees on Correction . Journal of Criminal Justice, 12. 61-70.
27.
Lewis, D.A. & Darling, C. (1990). The Idea of Community in Correctional Reform: How Rhetoric and Reality Join. In J. W. Murphy & J. Dison (Eds.), Are Prisons Any Better? Twenty Years of Correctional Reform (p. 95-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.
Martinson, R. (1971). The Treatment Evaluation Survey. New York: Office of Crime Control Planning of the State of New York.
29.
Martinson, R.M., Kassebaum, G.G., & Ward, D.A. (1964). A Critique of Research in Parole. Federal Probation. 28(3). 34-38.
30.
McAfee, W.M. & Shichor, D. (1990). A Historical-Sociological Analysis of California's Private Prison Experience in the 1850's: Some Modern Implications. Criminal Justice History An International Annual, 11. 89-103.
31.
Megargee, E. (1966). Undercontrolled and Overcontrolled Personality Types in Extreme Antisocial Aggression. Psychological Monographs , 80. No. 3.
32.
Merton, R. (1938). Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3. 672-682.
33.
Meyer, J.W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83. 340-363.
34.
Meyer, J.W., Scott, W.R., & Deal, T.E. (1981). Institutional and Technical Sources of Organizational Structure: Explaining the Structure of Educational Organizations. In H.D. Stein (Ed.), Organization and the Human Services: Cross-disciplinary reflections (p 151-178). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
35.
Morris, N. & Rothman, D. (1996). The Oxford History of the Prison. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Morris, N. & Tonry, M. (1990). Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. New York: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, J.W. & Dison, J. (1990). Are Prisons Any Better? Twenty Years of Correctional Reform. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1973). Corrections. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office .
41.
Newman, G. (1985). Just and Painful: A Case for the Corporal Punishment of Criminals. New York: Macmillan .
42.
O'Leary, V. & Hanrahan, K.J. (1976). Parole Systems in the United States (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Parole Institutes and Parole Policy Seminars .
43.
Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and Process in Modem Societies. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
44.
Petersilia, J. (1993). Measuring the Performance of Community Corrections . A paper prepared for the BJS/Princeton Outcomes Study Group and presented at the American Society of Criminology meeting October 1993.
45.
Robbins, I. (1986). Privatization of Corrections: Defining the Issues . Federal Probation. 50(3). 24-30.
46.
Robison, J. & Smith, G. (1971). The Effectiveness of Correctional Programs. Crime and Delinquency, 17. 67-80.
47.
Rosecrance, J. (1988). Maintaining the Myth of Individual Justice: Probation Presentence Reports. Justice Quarterly, 5(2). 235-256.
48.
Rothman, D.J. (1971). The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
49.
Schiflett, K.L. & Zey, M. (1990). Comparison of Characteristics of Private Product Producing Organizations and Public Service Organizations. Sociological Quarterly, 31(4). 569-583.
50.
Scott, W.R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
51.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. New York: Harper & Row.
52.
Simon, J. (1985). Back to the Future: Newman on Corporal Punishment . American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 927.
53.
Sullivan, L.E. (1990). The Prison Reform Movement. Part of the Twayne's Social Movement Series. Boston: G.K. Hall.
Thomas, C.W. (1987). Corrections in America: Problems of the Past and the Present. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Sage.
56.
Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57.
Van de ven, A.H. & Poole, M.S. (1995). Explaining Development and Change in Organizations . Academy of Management Review, 20(3). 510-540.
58.
Waite, R.G. (1991). From Penitentiary to Reformatory: Alexander Maconochie, Walter Crofton, Zebulon Brockway, and the Road to Prison Reform—New South Wales, Ireland, and Elmira, New York, 1840-70. Criminal Justice History: An International Annual, 12. 85-105.
59.
Wamsley, G.L. & Zald, M.N. (1973). The Political Economy of Public Organizations . Public Administration Review, 33(1). 62-73.
60.
Warner, W.K. & Havens, A.E. (1968). Goal Displacement and the Intangibility of Organizational Goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12. 538-555.
