In 1993, the New Hampshire Division for Children, Youth and Families introduced an objective guidelines instrument to help determine eligibility for placement at the state's juvenile training school. The instrument was intended to improve the consistency of dispositions and narrow training school placements to serious and/or chronic offenders by focusing recommendations on youths' offense characteristics and placing limits on the discretion of probation officers and judges. An evaluation of the implementation and impact of the guidelines analyzed one year's use of the instrument and surveyed probation officers' and judges' atti tudes towards and experiences with the guidelines. The results show that the guidelines did not have their intended impact because they were not truly implemented. The officials and staff charged with using them resist ed the limits the guidelines attempted to place on discretion. A consider ation of why the implementation failed sheds light on the process of implementing policy innovations in juvenile justice settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altschuler, D. And T. Armstrong1992Intensive Aftercare for High-Risk Juvenile Parolees: A Model Program DesignBaltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Institute for Policy Studies
2.
Andrews, D.A., J. Bonta and R.D. Hoge1990Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychologyCriminal Justice and Behavior, 17:19-52
3.
Andrews, D.A., I. Zinger, R.D. Hoge, J. Bonta, P. Gendreau and F.T. Cullen1990Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysisCriminology, 28: 369-404.
4.
Armstrong, T.L.1991Introduction In T. L. Armstrong (Ed), Intensive Interventions with High-Risk Youths: Promising Approaches in Juvenile Probation and Parole (pp. 1-26). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
5.
Ashford, J.B. and C.W. LeCroy1988Predicting recidivism: An evaluation of the Wisconsin juvenile probation and aftercare risk instrumentCriminal Justice and Behavior, 15:141-151.
6.
Baird, S.C.1984Classification of Juveniles in CorrectionMadison, WI: National Council on Crime and Delinquency .
7.
Bardach, E.1977The Implementation Game: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
Barton, W.H.1994Implementing detention policy changes In I.M. Schwartz & W. H. Barton (Eds.), Reforming Juvenile Detention: No More Hidden Closets (pp. 147-161). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
9.
Barton, W.H. And K.R. Gorsuch1989Risk assessment and classification in juvenile justicePaper presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Reno, NV.
10.
Barton, W.H., I.M. Schwartz and F. Orlando1994Reducing the use of secure detention in Broward County, Florida In I. M. Schwartz & W. H. Barton (Eds), Reforming Juvenile Detention: No More Hidden Closets (pp.69-96). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
11.
Barton, W.H., S.M. Streit and I.M. Schwartz1991A blueprint for Youth CorrectionsAnn Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for the Study of Youth Policy.
12.
Bazemore, G.1994Understanding the response to reforms limiting discretion: Judges' views of restrictions on detention intakeJustice Quarterly, 11:429-452.
13.
Berman, P.1978The study of macro- and micro-implementationPublic Policy, 26:157-184
14.
Bernard, T.J.1992The Cycle of Juvenile Justice: New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
Bortner, M.A.1982Inside a Juvenile Court: The Tarnished Ideal of Individualized JusticeNew York: New York University Press.
16.
Butts, J.A. And P. DeMuro1989A Risk Assessment and Population Profile: Delinquency Commitments to the Division for Children and Youth Services. Department of Health and Human Services, State of New HampshireAnn Arbor, MI: Center for the Study of Youth Policy .
17.
Coates, R.B., A.D. Miller and L.E. Ohlin1978Diversity in a Youth Correctional System: Handling Delinquents in MassachusettsCambridge, MA: Ballinger.
18.
Feld, B.1991Justice by geography: urban, suburban, and rural variations in juvenile justice administrationJournal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82:156-210.
19.
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice1996 a Intervention ManualTallahassee, FL: (author) .
20.
Florida Department of Juvenile Justice1996 b Intervention ManualTallahassee, FL: (author) .
21.
Gottfredson, D.C. And W.H. Barton1993Deinstitutionalization of juvenile offendersCriminology, 31:591-611
22.
Governor's Commission on Dispositional Guidelines for Juveniles1986Untitled reportConcord, NH: State of New Hampshire, Division for Children and Youth Services.
23.
Howell, J. C. (Ed.) 1995Guide for Implementing the Comprehensive Strategy for Serious, Violent, and Chronic Juvenile Offenders.Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .
24.
Jansson, B.S.1990Social Welfare Policy: From Theory to PracticeBelmont, CA: Wadsworth.
25.
Krisberg, B. And I. Schwartz1983Rethinking juvenile justiceCrime and Delinquency, 29:333-364.
26.
Lerman, P.1977Delinquency and social policy: A historical perspectiveCrime and Delinquency, 23:383-393.
27.
Maloney, D., D. Romig and T. Armstrong1988Juvenile probation: The balanced approachJuvenile and Family Court Journal, 39(3):1-62.
28.
McGarrell, E.F.1988Juvenile Correctional Reform: Two Decades of Policy and Procedural ChangeAlbany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29.
McNeece, C.A. and M. Ezell1983Political symbolism in juvenile justice. Reforming Florida's juvenile detention criteriaJournal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 10:242-258.
30.
Miller, A.D., L.E. Ohlin an R.B. Coates1977A Theory of Social Reform: Correctional Change Processes in Two StatesCambridge, MA: Ballinger .
31.
Miller, A.D. And Ohlin, L.E.1985Delinquency and Community: Creating Opportunities and ControlsBeverly Hills,CA: Sage Publications.
32.
Palumbo, D. And M. Harder1981Implementing Public PolicyLexington, MA: Lexington.
33.
Peterson, R.D.1995Expert policy in juvenile justice. Patterns of claims making and issues of power in a program constructionPolicy Studies Journal, 23:636-651.
34.
Pressman, J., and A. Wildavsky1973ImplementationBerkley, CA: University of California Press.
35.
Rice, R. And E. Rogers1980Reinvention and the Innovation ProcessKnowledge, 1:499-515.
36.
Sabatier, P. And D. Mazmanian1981The implementation of public policy: A frameworks of analysis In D. Mazmanian and P.Sabatier (Eds.), Effective policy implementation (pp. 3-35). Lexington, MA: Lexington.
37.
Sampson, R.J. and J.H. Laub1993Structural variations in juvenile court processing: Inequality, the underclass,, and social controlLaw and Society Review, 27:285-311.
38.
Tonry, M.1996Sentencing MattersNew York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Van Meter, D. and C. Van Horn1975The policy implementation process: A conceptual frameworkAdministration and Society, 6:445-488.
40.
von Hirsch, A.1985Past or Future Crimes: Deservedness and Dangerousness in the Sentencing of CriminalsNew Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
41.
Wiebush, R.G., C. Baird, B. Krisberg and D. Onek1995Risk assessment and clarification for serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. D. Hawkins, and J. J. Wilson (Eds.), Serious, Violent and Chronic Juvenile Offenders: A Sourcebook (pp. 171-212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
