The U.S. Supreme Court has often been analyzed in light of its symbolic importance. While most such analyses focus solely on the high court's insti tutional image, this article examines the justices' techniques for manipulating the symbolic qualities of their decisions affecting criminal justice rights. By creating a gap between the formal pronouncements about rights contained in well-known precedents and the actual implementation of those rights, the Supreme Court maintains its image as the institutional guardian of constitu tional rights while simultaneously advancing the crime control policy prefer ences favored by the dominant conservative justices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, Henry J.1985Justices and presidents: a political history of appointments to the Supreme CourtNew York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Alexander, Rudolph, Jr.1990The Mapp, Escobedo, and Miranda decisions: Do they serve a liberal or a conservative agenda?Criminal Justice Policy Review, 4: 39-52.
Brigham, John1987The cult of the courtPhiladelphia: Temple University Press.
5.
Bright, Stephen B.1994Counsel for the poor: The sentence not for the worst crimebut for the worst lawyerYale Law Journal, 103: 1835-1870
6.
. Bright, Stephen B., Stephen O. Kinnard, and David A. Webster1990Keeping Gideon from being blown awayCriminal Justice (Winter): 10-13, 46-48
7.
. Call, Jack E.1995Prison overcrowding cases in the aftermath of Wilson v. SeiterPrison Journal, 75: 390-405
8.
. Domino, John C.1994Civil rights and liberties: toward the 21 st centuryNew York: HarperCollins.
9.
Dorin, Dennis D.1994Far right of the mainstream: racism, rights, and remedies: From the perspective of Justice Antonin Scalia's McCleskey MemorandumMercer Law Review,45: 1035-1088
10.
. Edelman, Murray1964The symbolic uses of politicsUrbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
11.
Grano, Joseph.1988Miranda's constitutional difficulties: a reply to Professor SchulhoferUniversity of Chicago Law Review, 55: 174-186
12.
. Hensley, Thomas R., Christopher E. Smith, and Joyce A. Baugh1997The changing Supreme Court: constitutional rights and libertiesSt. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing.
13.
Leo, Richard A.1996Miranda's revenge: police interrogation as a confidence gameLaw and Society Review, 30: 259-288
14.
. Milner, Neal A.1971The court and local law enforcement: The impact of MirandaBeverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
15.
Moneymaker, James M. and W. Richard Janikowski1990The diminishing scope of the exclusionary ruleCriminal Justice Policy Review, 4: 105-114
16.
. Rosenberg, Gerald N.1991The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Scheingold, Stuart A.1974The politics of rights: lawyers, public policy, and political changeNew Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
18.
Schultz, David A. and Christopher E. Smith.1996The jurisprudential vision of Justice Antonin ScaliaLanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
Segal, Jeffrey, Lee Epstein, Charles Cameron, and Harold Spaeth1995Ideological values and the votes of U.S. Supreme Court justices revisitedJournal of Politics57: 812-823
20.
. Segal, Jeffrey, and Harold Spaeth1993The Supreme Court and the attitudinal modelNew York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Smith, Christopher E.1997Criminal justice and the 1995-96 U.S. Supreme Court termUniversity of Detroit/Mercy Law Review (forthcoming).
22.
1996Bent on original intent: Justice Thomas is asserting a distinct and cohesive visionAmerican Bar Association Journal , 82: 48-52.
23.
1991Courts and the poorChicago: Nelson-Hall.
24.
1989Bright-line rules and the Supreme Court: the tension between clarity in legal doctrine and justices' policy preferencesOhio Northern University Law Review, 16: 119-137.
25.
Smith, Christopher E., and Avis Alexandria Jones1993The Rehnquist Court's activism and the risk of injusticeConnecticut Law Review,26: 53-77
26.
. Smith, Christopher E. and Roxanne Ochoa1996The peremptory challenge in the eyes of the trial Judicature, 79: 185-189.
