Monitoring and Controlling Criminal Offenders Using the Satellite Global Positioning System Coupled to Surgically Implanted Transponders: Is It a Viable Alternative to Prison?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 1995
Monitoring and Controlling Criminal Offenders Using the Satellite Global Positioning System Coupled to Surgically Implanted Transponders: Is It a Viable Alternative to Prison?
This essay criticizes the continuing use of prisons as the primary means of controlling adjudicated criminal offenders. After conceding that prisons do control, but in ways which violate most of what has been discovered and should be known about how to promote lasting, positive behavior change, the argument is advanced that prisons are obsolete and should be replaced by a satellite surveillance system that would offer a better, less costly method to both monitor and control criminal offenders under conditions with far more potential for successful rehabilitation efforts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Camp G. M.,Graham-Camp C.The Corrections Year Book. New York: Criminal Justice Institute; 1992:
2.
Friel C. M.,Vaughn J. B.,del Carmen R.Research Report. Washington, D. C.: National Institute of Justice; 1986:
3.
Goffman E.Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor; 1961:
4.
HaleN.1995Program Manager, Quantitative Analysis Unit, Office of Medical Assistance Programs, Oregon Department of Human Resources, Salem, Oregon.
5.
Hann W. deThe Politics of Redress: Crime, Punishment, and Penal Abolition. London: Unwin Hyman; 1990:
6.
Hart J.Beyond 2000, Discovery. San Francisco: Chronicle Enterprises; 1995:
7.
Huxley A.Brave New World. New York: Harper & Row; 1946:
8.
Mathieson T.The Politics of Abolition. New York: Wiley; 1974:
9.
Mathieson T.Prison on Trial: A Critical Assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990:
Menninger K.The Crime of Punishment. New York: Viking; 1968:
12.
Murphy J. H.Tracking and Location Technologies for the Criminal Justice System. Pittsburgh: Westinghouse Electric Corporation; 1995:
13.
Nagel W. G.The Red Barn: A Critical Look At The Modern American Prison. New York: Walker; 1973:
14.
Orwell G.Nineteen Eighty-Four. New York: Harcourt Brace; 1949:
15.
Pepinsky H. E.Travis L. E.Schwartz M.D.Clear T. R., ed. Cincinnati: Anderson; 1992:131-139.
16.
Russell M. J.National Directory of Corrections Construction: 1993 Supplement. Washington, D. C.: National Institute of Justice; 1993:
17.
SchwitzgebelR. K.1969Issues In The Use of An Electronic Rehabilitation System with Chronic Recidivists. Law & Society Review. May.
18.
Sommer R.The End of Imprisonment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1976:
19.
U. S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Technology, Environment, Aviation, Committee on Science, Space and Technology1994The Global Positioning System: What Can't It Do? Hearing Report No. 102, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session. Washington, D. C.
20.
Advanced Electronic Monitoring for Tracking Persons on Probation or Parole. Pittsburgh: Westinghouse Electric Corporation; 1994:
21.
Wright R. A.In Defense of Prisons. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press; 1994:
