The Religious Freedom Restoration Act and Prisons and Jails: An Assessment and a Proposal

Abstract

In November of 1993, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) was signed into law by the President. Its purpose was to overrule a 1990 Supreme Court decision and require government to satisfy a compelling interest test when its laws or actions place a substantial burden on an individual's exercise of personal religious beliefs. This article explores the impact of RFRA on prisons and jails. Since there was a failed effort in Congress to exempt prisons and jails from the strictures of RFRA, there is no question that RFRA applies to these institutions. The article begins by explaining the law on the free exercise of religion prior to RFRA. Then the provisions of RFRA and its legislative history are explored briefly. An assessment is made of the likely effect of RFRA on prisons and jails and its constitutionality. The article concludes with a recommendation for amending RFRA designed to insure that the free exercise rights of inmates are adequately protected, while not unduly hampering the ability of corrections administrators to run their prisons and jails safely and efficiently.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

HansenM.1994Religious Freedom Act Worries AGs. American Bar Association Journal, February 1994:20.

HansenR.DaleyH.1995Challenging the Conditions of Prisons and Jails: A Report on Section 1983 Litigation.

LaycockD.1993The Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1993:221.

LaycockD.1994Free Exercise and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Fordham Law Review, 62:896.

Pawa M.

.When the Supreme Court Restricts Constitutional Rights, Can Congress Save Us? An Examination of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment.University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 1993;141:1029

Peltason J.W.

Understanding the Constitution. 12th ed.San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1991:

Rotunda R.

Nowak J.

Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure. 2nd ed.St. Paul: West Publishing; 1992:

Ryan J.E.

.Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act: An Iconoclastic Approach.Virginia Law Review. 1992;78:1407

Schnable M.A.

.The Religious Freedom Restoration Act: A Prison's Dilemma.Willamette Law Review. 1993;29:323

10.

Senate Judiciary Committee1994Senate Report No. 103–111.

11.

WilsonJ.C.1994Inmates' License to Sue. Corrections Today, July 1994:150.

12.

Cases Cited

13.

Abdul Wali v. Coughlin, 754 F.2d 1015 (2d Cir. 1985).

14.

Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979).

15.

Best v. Kelly, 879 F.Supp. 305 (W.D.N.Y. 1995).

16.

Boone v. Commissioner of Prisons, 1994 WL 383590 (E.D.Pa. 1994).

17.

Brown-El v. Harris, 26 F.3d 68 (8th Cir. 1994).

18.

Cantwell v. Connecticut, 60 S.Ct. 900 (1940).

19.

Campos v. Coughlin, 854 F.Supp. 194 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).

20.

Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976).

21.

Diaz v. Collins, 872 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.Tex. 1994).

22.

Employment Division v. Smith, 110 S.Ct. 2605 (1990).

23.

Flores v. City of Boerne, 877 F.Supp. 355 (W.D.Tex. 1995).

24.

Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida, 107 S.Ct. 1046 (1987).

25.

Lawson v. Dagger, 844 F.Supp. 1538 (S.D.FIa. 1994).

26.

Lawson v. Wainwright, 641 F.Supp. 312 (S.D.Fla. 1986).

27.

Levinson-Roth v. Parries, 872 F.Supp. 1439 (D.Md. 1995).

28.

Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association, 485 U.S. 439 (1988).

29.

Merritt-Dey v. Delo, 1994 WL 263780 (8th Cir. 1994).

30.

Messina v. Mazzeo, 854 F.Supp. 116 (E.D.N.Y. 1994).

31.

Missouri v. Jenkins, 110 S.Ct. 1651 (1990).

32.

O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 107 S.Ct. 2400 (1987).

33.

Phipps v. Parker, 879 F.Supp. 734 (W.D.Ky. 1995).

34.

Prins v. Coughlin, 1994 WL 411016 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).

35.

Procunier v. Martinez, 94 S.Ct. 1800 (1974).

36.

Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337 (1981).

37.

Sherbert v. Vemer, 83 S.Ct. 1790 (1963).

38.

Thomas v. Review Board, 101 S.Ct. 1425 (1981).

39.

Turner v. Safley, 107 S.Ct. 2254 (1987).

40.

Wisconsin v. Yoder, 92 S.Ct. 1526 (1972).

41.

Woods v. Evatt, 876 F.Supp. 756 (D.S.C. 1995).