Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 1995-06
Book Reviews : Smart Sentencing: The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions Editors: James M. Byrne,Arthur J. Lurigio,and Joan Petersilia Publisher: Sage Publications,Inc. Pages: 352 Price: $22.95
Ball, R.A. and Lilly, J.R.1986The potential use of home incarceration for drunken driversCrime & Delinquency.32,2: 224-245.
2.
Cohen, R.L.1992Drunk Driving: 1989 Survey Of Inmates Of Local Jails. Bureau of Justice Statistics, United States Department of Justice , Washington, D.C.: GPO, NCJ-134728.
3.
Gottfredson, M.R. and D.M. Gottfredson1988Decision Making In Criminal Justice: Toward The Rational Exercise Of Discretion (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Press.
4.
Jacobs, J.B.1989Drunk Driving: An American DilemmaChicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5.
Lilly, J.R., R.A. Ball, G.D. Curry, and J. McMullen1993Electronic monitoring of the drunk driver: A seven-year study of the home confinement alternativeCrime & Delinquency . 39,4: 462-484.
6.
Petersilia, J. and S. Turner1990Intensive Supervision For High Risk ProbationersSanta Monica, CA: RAND.
7.
Morash. M. and Rucker, L.1990A critical look at the idea of boot camp as a correctional reformCrime & Delinquency. 36,2: 204-222.
8.
Morris, N. and M. Tonry1990Between Prison And Probation: Intermediate Punishments In A Rational Sentencing System. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Sechrest, D.K.1989Prison "boot camps" do not measure upFederal Probation. September: 15-20.
10.
von Hirsch, A.1990The ethics of community-based sanctions. Crime & Delinquency.36,1: 162-173.
11.
Whitehead, J.T.1992Control and the use of technology in community supervision. In P.J. Benekos and A.V. Merlo (eds) Corrections: Dilemmas And Directions . Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company: 155-172.