The various methods of selecting state trial court judges continue to generate controversy. Partisan and nonpartisan elections, executive and legislative appointments, and the Missouri Plan represent a philosophy of judicial accountability versus judicial independence. The selection plans are described briefly; criticisms of the primary systems of judicial selection are presented. The authors conclude that appointive methods are no more effective than the elective process in placing qualified judges on the bench, while neither method is successful in fulfilling philosophical expectations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlarconA. S.1983Political appointments and judicial independence — An unreasonable expectation. Loyola Of Los Angeles Law Review, 16: 9–15.
2.
AshmanA.AlfiniJ. J.1974The Key To Judicial Merit Selection: The Nominating Process. Washington, DC: American Judicature Society. (LEAA Grant No. 73-DF-99–0002).
3.
AtkinsB.M.GlickH. R.1974Formal judicial recruitment and state supreme court decisions. American Politics Quarterly, 2: 427–449.
4.
BemanL. T.1926Election Vs. Appointment Of Judges. (Vol. IV, No. 2). New York: H. W. Wilson.
5.
BrennanT. E.1986Nonpartisan election of judges: The Michigan case. Southwestern Law Journal, 40: 23–29.
6.
CanonB.C.1972The impact of formal selection process on the characteristics of judges, reconsidered. Law And Society Review, 6: 579–593.
7.
ChampagneA.1986The selection and retention of judges in Texas. Southwestern Law Journal, 40: 53–117.
8.
ClarkD.S.1981Adjudication to administration: A statistical analysis of federal district courts in the twentieth century. Southern California Law Review, 55: 65–152.
9.
CulverJ. H.1982Politics and the California plan for choosing appellate judges: A lesson at large on judicial selection. Judicature, 66(3–4): 151–162.
10.
DuboisP.1980From Ballot To Bench: Judicial Elections And The Quest For Quality. Austin: U of Texas P.
11.
DuboisP. L.1986Accountability, independence, and the selection of state judges: The role of popular judicial elections. Southwestern Law Journal, 40: 31–52.
12.
FlangoV.DucatC.1979What difference does the method of selection make? Selection procedures in the state courts of last resort. Justice System Journal, 5: 25–44.
13.
GoldmanS.1982Judicial selection and the qualities that make a “good” judge. In LevinA. L.WheelerR. R., eds. The Annals Of The American Academy Of Political And Social Science. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 112–124.
14.
GoldmanS.1976American judges: Their selection, tenure, variety and quality. In MooreR. H.Jr.MarksT. C.Jr.BarrowR. V., eds. Readings in criminal justice. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. 247–258.
15.
HaynesE.1944Selection And Tenure Of Judges. Washington, DC: National Conference of Judicial Councils.
16.
JacobH.VinesK.1976Politics In The American States: A Comparative Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.
17.
KennedyD.1982Legal education as training for hierarchy. In KairysD., ed. The Politics Of Law. New York: Pantheon.
18.
KodaniR.1983The selection of judges: A critical factor in the administration of justice. Hawaii Bar Journal, 18(1): 53–59.
19.
KramerJ.H.LubitzR.L.1985Pennsylvania's sentencing reform: The impact of commission-established guidelines. Crime And Delinquency, 31: 481–500.
20.
KrivoshaN.1986Acquiring judges by the merit selection method: The case for adopting such a method. Southwestern Law Journal, 40: 15–22.
21.
LevinM.A.1988Urban politics and policy outcomes: The criminal courts. In ColeG. F., ed. Criminal Justice: Law And Politics. 4th ed.Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. 330–350.
22.
MaguireK.FlanaganT.J.1990Sourcebook Of Criminal Justice Statistics—1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23.
McMillianT.1986Selection of state court judges. Southwestern Law Journal, 40: 9–13.
24.
NagelS.1975Improving The Legal Process. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25.
NeubauerD.W.1988America's Courts And The Criminal Justice System3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
26.
SchneiderR.MaughanR.1979Does the appointment of judges lead to a more conservative bench? The case of California. Justice System Journal, 5: 45–57.
27.
SeisD. E.1982Selecting judges in the states: A brief history and analysis. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 9: 459–473.
28.
SlotnickE.E.1988Review essay on judaical recruitment and selection. Justice System Journal, 13: 109–124.
29.
SheldonC.H.LovrichN.P.1991State judicial recruitment. In GatesJ.B.JohnsonC. A., eds. The American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly. 161–188.
30.
StephensC. D.1985Judicial selection and a more representative judiciary. Michigan Bar Journal, 64: 528–531.
31.
VolcansekM.L.1982The effects of judicial selection reform: What we know and what we do not. In DuboisP. L., ed. The Analysis Of Judicial Reform. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
32.
WasmannE.LovrichN. P.Jr.SheldonC. H.1986Perception of state and local courts: A comparison across selection systems. Justice System Journal, 11(2): 168–185.
33.
WatsonR. A.1986Observations on the Missouri nonpartisan court plan. Southwestern Law Journal, 40: 1–7.
34.
WatsonR.A.DowningR.G.1969The Politics Of The Bench And The Bar. New York: John Wiley & Son.
