Rising crime rates through the 1980s suggest that traditional methods of policing society (i.e., police patrol and arrest) are not fully effective in controlling criminal victimizations. Analysis of community crime prevention programs suggests that while such programs tend to be favorably received by the public and the police, they only infrequently reduce crime. Evaluation research in this area tends to suggest that the apparent failures of crime prevention programs do not result from inappropriate conceptualization, but rather stem from inadequate program implementation and subsequent monitoring. This article examines the evaluation studies usually done as part of community crime prevention programs and addresses the methodological and substantive problems associated with them. Policy guidelines for implementing future crime prevention programs are discussed. Finally, the paper concludes with a discussion of two common themes implicit in the community crime prevention literature which could provide a solution to crime prevention program implementation difficulties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cirel, P., P. Evans, D. McGillis, and D. Whitcomb1977Community Crime Prevention Program: Seattle, Washington . Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
2.
Cohen, L.E., and D. Cantor1981Residential burglary in the United States: Life-style and demographic factors associated with the probability of victimization . Journal Of Research In Crime And Delinquency18, 1: 113-127.
3.
Currie, E.1985Confronting Crime: An American Challenge. New York: Pantheon Books.
4.
Curtis, L.A.1987The retreat of folly: Some modest replications of inner-city success. In L.A. Curtis (ed.) The Annals Of The American Academy Of Political And Social Science: Policies To Prevent Crime, 494. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
Feins, J.D.1983Partnership For Neighborhood Crime Prevention. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
6.
Fowler, F.J., and T.W. Mangione1986A three-pronged effort to reduce crime and fear of crime: The Hartford experiment. In D.P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work ? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
7.
Flower, F.J., M.E. McCalla, and T.W. Mangione1979Reducing Residential Crime And Fear: The Hartford Neighborhood Crime Prevention Program. Executive Summary. Washington, D.C.: Nationional Insititue of Justice .
8.
Grant, J.A., D.A. Lewis, and D.P. Rosenbaugh1988Political benefits of program participation: The case of community crime prevention. Journal Of Urban Affairs10, 4: 373-385.
9.
Greenberg, M.A.1984Auxiliary Police: The Citizen's Approach To Public Safety. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
10.
Heinzelmann, F.1981Crime prevention and the physical environment. In D.A. Lewis (ed.) Reactions To Crime. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
11.
Herrington, L.H.1987Victim rights and criminal justice reform. In L.A. Curtis (ed.) The Annals Of The American Academy Of Political And Social Science: Policies To Prevent Crime, 494. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
12.
Jeffery, C.R.1977Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
Kenney, D.J.1987Crime, Fear, And The New York City Subways: The Role Of Citizen Action. New York: Praeger Publishers.
14.
Kingsbury, A.A.1973Introduction To Security And Crime Prevention Surveys . Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas .
15.
Laub, J.H.1983Urbanism, race, and crime. Journal Of Research In Crime And Delinquency20, 2: 183-198.
16.
Lavrakas, P.J., and J.W. Kushmuk1986Evaluating crime prevention through environmental design: The Portland commercial demonstration project. In D.P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
17.
Lewis, D.A. (ed.) 1981Reactions to Crime . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
18.
Lindsay, B., and D. McGillis 1986Citywide community crime prevention: An assessment of the Seattle program. In D.P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
19.
Lurigio, A.J., and D.P. Rosenbaum1986Evaluation research in community crime prevention . In D.P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
20.
National Crime Prevention Institute1986Understanding Crime Prevention. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth Publishers.
21.
Newman, O.1972Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design. New York: MacMillan Company .
22.
Pennell, S., C. Curtis, and J. Henderson1986Guardian Angels: An Assessment Of Citizen Response To Crime. Executive Summary. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
23.
Podelefsky, A., and F. DuBow1981Strategies For Community Crime Prevention; Collective Responses To Crime In Urban American. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher.
24.
Rosenbaum, D.P.1988Community crime prevention: A review and synthesis of the literature. Justice Quarterly5, 3: 323-395. 1987The theory and research behind neighborhood watch: Is it a sound fear and crime reduction strategy? Crime And Delinquency33, 1: 103-134. 1986The problem of crime control. In D.P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Preventions. Does It work? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
Rosenbaum, D.P., Lewis, D.A. and J.A. Grant1986Neighborhood-based crime prevention: Assessing the efficacy of community organizing in Chicago. In D.P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
26.
Rosenbaum, H.J., and P.C. Sederberg (eds.) 1976Vigilante Politics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
27.
Sampson, R.J. and J.D. Wooldredge1987Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyles— routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal Of Quantitative Criminology3, 4: 371-393.
28.
Schneider, A.L.1986Neighborhood-based anti-burglary strategies: An analysis of public and private benefits from the Portland program. In D.P. Rosenbaum (ed.) Community Crime Prevention: Does It Work ? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications .
29.
Silberman, C.E.1978Criminal Violence, Criminal Justice. New York: Vintage Books.
30.
Skolnick, J.H. and D.H. Bayley1988Community Policing: Issues And Practices Around The World. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
31.
Troyer, R.J.1988The urban anti-crime patrol phenomenon: A case study of a student effort. Justice Quarterly5, 3: 397-419.
32.
Walker, S.1989Sense And Nonsense About Crime: A Policy Guide. 2nd Edition. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
33.
Washnis, G.J.1972Municipal Decentralization And Neighborhood Resources: Case Studies Of Twelve Cities. New York: Praeger Publishing.
34.
Wilson, J.Q.1985Thinking About Crime. Revised Edition. New York: Vintage Books .
35.
Wilson, J.Q., and R.J. Herrnstein1985Crime And Human Nature: The Definitive Study Of The Causes Of Crime. New York: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
36.
Wilson, J.Q., and G.L. Kelling1982Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly , March: 29-38.
