For about the last twenty years, policy dealing with crime and administration of justice has been heavily permeated with the systems perspective. This was particularly true during the 1970s. Since then such emphasis has waned. This essay profiles both the events which led to the enthusiastic application of the systems framework to crime and justice policy and the events which led to its decline. The latter is attributed to the failure of the criminal justice system's concept to properly take into account fundamental political and operational realities involved in the administration of justice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaronson, E.E., N.N. Kittrie, D.J. Saari and C.S. Cooper1977Alternatives To Conventional Criminal Adjudication: Guidebook For Planners And Practitioners. Washington, D.C. : National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
2.
Belkin, J., A. Blumstein, G. Cassidy and J. Cohen1976Performance Measurement And The Criminal Justice System: Four Conceptual Approaches. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
3.
Blumstein, A.1968A National Program Of Research, Development, Test And Evaluation On Law Enforcement And Criminal Justice. Arlington, VA: Institute of Defense Analysis.
4.
1975A model to aid in planning for a total criminal justice system . In L. Oberlander, ed., Quantitative Tools For Criminal Justice Planning. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
5.
Blumstein, A. and R. Larson1969Models of total criminal justice system. Operation Research, 1;7: 199-232.
6.
Chaiken, J., T. Crabill, L. Holliday, D. Jaquette, M. Lawless and E. Quade1976Criminal Justice Models: An Overview. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
7.
Davis, K.C.1969Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
8.
Etzioni, A.1970Indicators of the capacities for social guidance . The Annals Of The American Academy Of Political And Social Science, 388: 25-34.
9.
Goldstein, H.1963Police discretion: The ideal versus the real. Public Administration Review, 23: 140-148.
10.
Hudzik, J.H.1984Federal Aid To Criminal Justice: Rhetoric, Results And Lessons. Washington, D.C.: National Criminal Justice Association.
11.
Kelling, G.L.1985Order maintenance, the quality of urban life, and police: A line of argument. In W.A. Geller , Ed., Police Leadership In America. Chicago: American Bar Foundation/Praeger.
12.
Kuykendall, J.1986The municipal police detective: An historical analysis . Criminology, 24: 175-201.
13.
Lab, S.P.1984Police productivity: The other eighty percent. Journal Of Police Sciences And Administration, 12: 297-302.
14.
Nimmer, R.T.1971Two Million Unnecessary Arrests. Chicago : American Bar Foundation.
15.
Ostrom, V.1983Nonhierarchical approaches to the organization of public activity. The Annals Of The American Academy Of Political And Social Science, 446: 135-147.
16.
Packer, H.L.1968The Limits Of Criminal Sanction. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
17.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice1967The Challenge Of Crime In A Free Society. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
18.
Schlesinger, J.R.1968Systems analyses and the political process. In F.S. Lane, ed., Current Issues In Public Administration . New York: St. Martin's Press.
19.
Skoler, D.L.1978Criminal Justice Organization, Financing And Structure: Essays And Exploration. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
20.
Springer, M.1970Social indicators, reports and accounts: Toward the management of society. The Annals Of The American Academy Of Political And Social Sciences, 388: 1-13.
21.
U.S. Department of Justice1970Selected presentation from the 1970 National Conference on Law Enforcement Education. Washington, D.C.: Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
22.
Vanagunas, S.1972Sharing crime control funds: An analysis of the proposed revenue sharing amendments to the safe streets act. Public Administration Review, 32: 127-134.
23.
Weirman, C. and W.G. Archambeault1983Assessing the effects of LEAA demise on criminal justice higher education. Journal Of Criminal Justice, 11: 549-561.
24.
Wilson, J.Q.1981Policy intellectuals and public policy. The Public Interest, 64: 31-46.