Detention or Dissent: Judicial Utilization of Public Safety Assessments During Pretrial Detention Hearings in a New Jersey Courtroom

Abstract

This study examines how the Public Safety Assessment (PSA), a type of risk assessment tool employed to assist with pretrial decision-making, is utilized during virtual detention hearings in New Jersey. Drawing on observational data from a single courtroom (N = 330), we (a) describe judicial departures from PSA recommendations, (b) employ logistic regression models to assess the factors predicting departures, and (c) explore the reasons provided by judges for departures. The findings show that departures from PSAs are common and that most defendants are either detained or released under the most restrictive monitoring conditions, even in cases involving defendants considered to be lower risk. Moreover, and consistent with focal concerns, factors signaling a defendant’s dangerousness (e.g., current monitoring status and number of alleged offenses) predict departures. Overall, our findings suggest that judicial discretionary power continues to play a role in the courtroom.

Keywords

discretion detention hearings Public Safety Assessment risk assessment tools bail reform

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

C. A.

(1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31(4), 789–822.

Anderson

Redcross

Valentine

Miratrix

(2019). Evaluation of pretrial justice system reforms that use the public safety assessment: Effects of New Jersey’s criminal justice reform. MDRC.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

Wormith

J. S.

(2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27.

Arnold Ventures. (2015). 2015 Laura and John Arnold foundation annual report. https://www.arnoldventures.org/stories/2015-laura-and-john-arnold-foundation-annual-report

Baradaran

McIntyre

F. L.

(2011). Predicting violence. Texas Law Review, 90, 497.

Baumer

E. P.

(2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 231–261.

Cooprider

(2009). Pretrial risk assessment and case classification: A case study. Federal Probation, 73(1), 12–15.

Copp

J. E.

Casey

Blomberg

T. G.

Pesta

(2022). Pretrial risk assessment instruments in practice: The role of judicial discretion in pretrial reform. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(2), 329–358.

Danner

M. J. E.

VanNostrand

Spruance

L. M.

(2015). Risk-based pretrial release recommendations and supervision guidelines. Luminosity. https://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/sites/dcjs.virginia.gov/files/publications/corrections/risk-basedpretrial-release-recommendation-and-supervision-guidelines.pdf

10.

DeMichele

Baumgartner

Barrick

Comfort

Scaggs

Misra

(2019). What do criminal justice professionals think about risk assessment at pretrial. Federal Probation, 83(1), 32–41.

11.

Desmarais

S. L.

Lowder

E. M.

(2019). Pretrial risk assessment tools: A primer for judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys. Safety and Justice Challenge.

12.

Desmarais

S. L.

Monahan

Austin

(2022). The empirical case for pretrial risk assessment instruments. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(6), 807–816.

13.

Difilippo

. (2022, June). Courts must do more to ensure defendants’ right to speedy trial, N.J. Supreme Court says. New Jersey Monitor. https://newjerseymonitor.com/2022/06/27/courts-must-do-more-to-ensure-defendants-right-to-speedy-trial-n-j-supreme-court-says/

14.

Engen

R. L.

Gainey

R. R.

Crutchfield

R. D.

Weis

J. G.

(2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives. Criminology, 41(1), 99–130.

15.

Godfrey

Richardson

J. C.

Walklate

(2022). The crisis in the courts: Before and beyond COVID. The British Journal of Criminology, 62(4), 1036–1053.

16.

Goodman

(2008). “It’s just Black, White, or Hispanic”: An observational study of racializing moves in California’s segregated prison reception centers. Law & Society Review, 42(4), 735–770.

17.

Hannah-Moffat

(2015). The uncertainties of risk assessment: Partiality, transparency, and just decisions. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 27(4), 244–247.

18.

Holmes

D’Amato

(2019). Judicial and prosecutorial decision-making: Assessing the effects of race, gender, and age on federal downward sentencing departures, 2013–2016. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(4), 449–466.

19.

Imai

Jiang

Greiner

D. J.

Halen

Shin

(2023). Experimental evaluation of algorithm-assisted human decision-making: Application to pretrial public safety assessment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 186(2), 167–189.

20.

Irwin

(1985). Jail: Managing the underclass in American society (1st ed.). University of California Press.

21.

Johnson

B. D.

Ulmer

J. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(2008). The social context of guidelines circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46(3), 737–783.

22.

Joint Committee on Criminal Justice. (2014). Report of the Joint Committee on Criminal Justice. New Jersey Courts. https://www.njcourts.gov/sites/default/files/courts/criminal/criminal-justice-reform/reconvenedcommreport.pdf

23.

Kaiser

Spohn

(2018). Why do judges depart? A review of reasons for judicial departures in federal sentencing. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 19(2), 43–62.

24.

Koepke

J. L.

Robinson

D. G.

(2018). Danger ahead: Risk assessment and the future of bail reform. Washington Law Review, 93, 1725.

25.

Kramer

J. H.

Ulmer

J. T.

(1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13(1), 81–106.

26.

Kramer

J. H.

Ulmer

J. T.

(2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court “corrections” to Pennsylvania’s sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40(4), 897–932.

27.

Kramer

K. L.

Wang

(2019). Assessing cumulative disadvantage against minority female defendants in state courts. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1284–1313.

28.

Kurlychek

M. C.

Johnson

B. D.

(2019). Cumulative disadvantage in the American criminal justice system. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 291–319.

29.

LaFree

G. D.

(1985). Official reactions to Hispanic defendants in the Southwest. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(3), 213–237.

30.

(2019, May). Addressing the biases plaguing algorithms. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/05/addressing-the-biases-plaguing-algorithms

31.

Lowder

E. M.

Diaz

C. L.

Grommon

Ray

B. R.

(2021). Effects of pretrial risk assessments on release decisions and misconduct outcomes relative to practice as usual. Journal of Criminal Justice, 73, Article 101754.

32.

Lowder

E. M.

Foudray

C. M. A.

(2021). Use of risk assessments in pretrial supervision decision-making and associated outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 67(11), 1765–1791.

33.

Lowder

E. M.

Kamara

Z. B.

Kent

(2023). Pretrial decision-making matrices: The role of risk and charge weighting in risk assessment-guided decisions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50, 1279–1298.

34.

Lowenkamp

C. T.

(2009). The development of an actuarial risk assessment instrument for US pretrial services. Federal Probation, 73(2), 33–36.

35.

Lynch

(2019). Focally concerned about focal concerns: A conceptual and methodological critique of sentencing disparities research. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1148–1175.

36.

Martinez

B. P.

Petersen

Omori

(2020). Time, money, and punishment: Institutional racial-ethnic inequalities in pretrial detention and case outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6–7), 837–863.

37.

Mayson

S. G.

(2018, September 28). Bias in, bias out. Bias Out, 128.

38.

Mitchell

(2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 439–466.

39.

Mustard

D. B.

(2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the US federal courts. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 285–314.

40.

Neal

(2012). Bail fail: Why the US should end the practice of using money for bail. Justice Policy Institute.

41.

New Jersey Courts. (2018). Annual report to the governor and the legislature. https://www.njcourts.gov/public/concerns/criminal-justice-reform

42.

New Jersey Courts. (2021). Annual report to the governor and the legislature. https://www.njcourts.gov/public/concerns/criminal-justice-reform

43.

New Jersey Law Journal Editorial Board. (2021, November 31). Bail reform is working. New Jersey Law Journal. https://www.law.com/njlawjournal/2021/11/07/bail-reform-is-working/?slreturn=20230102123144

44.

Nourani-Dargiri

(2022). Guilty? Or just poor? Potential international human rights violations in the US bail system. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 54(1), 509.

45.

Ostrom

Kleiman

Cheesman

Hansen

Kauder

N. B.

(2002). Offender risk assessment in Virginia: A three-stage evaluation. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/offender-risk-assessment-virginia-three-stage-evaluation

46.

Preston

Eisenberg

(2022). Profit over people: The commercial bail industry fueling America’s cash bail systems. Center for American Progress.

47.

Rabuy

Kopf

(2016, May). Detaining the poor: How money bail perpetuates an endless cycle of poverty and jail time. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/incomejails.html

48.

Reinhart

Chen

D. L.

(2020). Incarceration and its disseminations: COVID-19 pandemic lessons from Chicago’s Cook County Jail: Study examines how arrest and pre-trial detention practices may be contributing to the spread of COVID-19. Health Affairs, 39(8), 1412–1418.

49.

Rengifo

A. F.

Flores

S. G.

Jackson

A. N.

(2021). From bright plots to blind spots: Mapping departures in case review post-bail reform in two New Jersey courts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(1), 96–115.

50.

Robinson

D. G.

Koepke

(2019). Civil rights and pretrial risk assessment instruments. Safety and Justice Challenge.

51.

Schlesinger

(2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22(2), 170–192.

52.

Smith

(2022). Pretrial detention, pretrial release, and public safety. Arnold Ventures.

53.

Spohn

(2023). What predicts failure to appear for court hearings? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 34, 387–410.

54.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

J. T.

Kramer

J. H.

(1998). The interaction of race, gender and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798.

55.

Stevenson

(2018). Assessing risk assessment in action. Minnesota Law Review, 103(1), 303–384.

56.

Terranova

V. A.

Ward

Slepicka

Azari

A. M.

(2020). Perceptions of pretrial risk assessment: An examination across role in the initial pretrial release decision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(8), 927–942.

57.

Ulmer

J. T.

Silver

Hanrath

L. S.

(2023). Back to basics: A critical examination of the Focal Concerns Framework from the perspective of judges. Justice Quarterly, 40, 813–836.

58.

Van Cleve

N. G

. (2016). Crook County: Racism and injustice in America’s largest criminal court. Stanford University Press.

59.

VanNostrand

(2013). New Jersey jail population analysis: Identifying opportunities to safely and responsibly reduce the jail population. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/new-jersey-jail-population-analysis-identifying-opportunities

60.

Viglione

Peck

J. H.

Frazier

J. D.

(2023). COVID-19 and courts: An exploration of the impacts of the pandemic on case processing and operations. Victims & Offenders, 18(5), 818–841.

61.

Walker

(1980). Popular justice: A history of American criminal justice. Oxford University Press.

62.

Williams

M. R.

(2016). From bail to jail: The effect of jail capacity on bail decisions. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 484–497.

63.

Wooldredge

(2012). Distinguishing race effects on pre-trial release and sentencing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 41–75.

64.

Zatz

M. S.

(2022). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. In C. E. Kubrin & T. D. Stucky (Eds.), Introduction to criminal justice: A sociological perspective (pp. 203–218). Stanford University Press.

65.

Zottola

S. A.

Desmarais

S. L.

(2022). Comparing the relationships between money bail, pretrial risk scores, and pretrial outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 46(4), 277–289.