Coping With Limited Prosecutorial Resources: An Assessment of the Case Processing and Community Impact From the Perspective of Prosecutors and Staff in a Southeastern County

Abstract

Counties across the country are experiencing population growth with associated crime increases while prosecutor offices remain under-resourced. Resource constraints have implications for case processing and community relations. This study offers a descriptive assessment of prosecutor and staff perceptions on resource challenges, using the Mecklenburg County District Attorney’s Office in North Carolina as a case study—a county where staffing and funding has stagnated over the past decade. Employing official data, interviews, and surveys, we considered how prosecutorial resources in Mecklenburg County compared with similar counties within the state, region, and country, as well as explored perceptions of resource constraints and the impact on office effectiveness and the community. Results suggested that Mecklenburg County did not compare favorably with similar counties in the region and nation, suffered more broadly from criminal justice funding challenges, and faced staffing shortages and turnover that were perceived as affecting case dispositions, office morale, and community trust.

Keywords

prosecution resources funding case processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albonetti

C. A.

(1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case processing. Criminology, 24, 623–644.

Albonetti

C. A.

(1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21, 291–314.

Albonetti

C. A.

(1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247–266.

Alschuler

A. W.

(1968). The prosecutor’s role in plea bargaining. The University of Chicago Law Review, 36, 50–112.

Bibas

(2004). Plea bargaining outside the shadow of a trial. Harvard Law Review, 117, 2463–2547.

Biener

(2021). Prosecutor workplace and compensation study: Report of findings. Association of Prosecuting Attorneys and Lafayette College. https://www.apainc.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Lafayette-APA-Prosecutor-Workplace-Study.pdf

Bloch

K. R.

Engen

R. L.

Parrotta

K. L.

(2014). The intersection of race and gender: An examination of sentencing outcomes in North Carolina. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(4), 419–438.

Blumberg

(1967). The practice of law as a confidence game: Organizational cooperation of a profession. Law and Society Review, 1, 15–40.

Bourgeois

J. W.

Henry

Kwende

Henderson

(2019). An examination of prosecutorial staff, budgets, caseloads and the need for change: In search of a standard. Center for Justice Research and Texas Southern University. https://assets-global.website-files.com/5ef1f236f51b59892a5aec87/5f5e0ad483b2a17b9fdd26a4_ProsecutorWorkload%20Report.pdf

10.

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.

11.

Cole

(1970). The decision to prosecute. Law and Society Review, 4, 331–343.

12.

Community Oriented Policing Services. (2007). Building trust between the police and the citizens they serve. U.S. Department of Justice, COPS Office. https://cops.usdoj.gov/buildingtrust

13.

Community Oriented Policing Services. (2022). Grants. US Department of Justice, COPS Office. https://cops.usdoj.gov/grants

14.

Cotti

Engelhardt

Richie

(2022). Government funding incentives and felony charge rates. Journal of Crime and Justice, 45(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2021.1939765

15.

Federal Bureau of Investigations. (2022). Uniform Crime Reports (Table 80). https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/tables/table-80/table-80-state-cuts/north_carolina.xls

16.

Flatt

S. T.

(2009). The toughest critics: Do prosecutor decisions affect police activities? [Master’s Thesis, UNC Charlotte].

17.

Goelzhauser

(2013). Prosecutorial discretion under resource constraints. Judicature, 96, 161–168.

18.

Goldcamp

J. S.

Irons-Guynn

Weiland

(2002). Community prosecution strategies: Measuring impact. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs.

19.

Johnson

B. D.

King

R. D.

Spohn

(2016). Socio-legal approaches to the study of guilty pleas and prosecution. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12, 479–495.

20.

Johnson

B. D.

Larroulet

(2019). The “distance traveled”: Investigating the downstream consequences of charge reductions for disparities in incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1229–1257.

21.

Kaplan

(2022). Uniform crime reporting (UCR) program data: A practitioner’s guide. https://ucrbook.com/index.html

22.

Kuhns

J. B.

Messer

(2019). Workload assessment and process mapping of investigative units (homicide) at the Charlotte Mecklenburg police department (Report submitted to the Charlotte Mecklenburg police department). University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

23.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Andiloro

N. R.

Johnson

B. D.

Spohn

C. C.

(2014). Cumulative disadvantage: Examining racial and ethnic disparity in prosecution and sentencing. Criminology, 52(3), 514–551.

24.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Lawson

V. Z.

Andiloro

N. R.

(2015). Does evidence really matter? An exploratory analysis of the role of evidence in plea bargaining in felony drug cases. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 431–442.

25.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Meldrum

Richardson

Stemen

Webster

Arndt

Matthews

Soor

(2018). Prosecutorial attitudes, perspectives, and priorities: Insights from the inside. Advancing Prosecutorial Effectiveness and Fairness Report Series, MacArthur Foundation.

26.

Kutateladze

B. L.

Richardson

Meldrum

Liu

Stemen

Olson

DuPont

(2020). Implementation guide for prosecutorial performance indicators. MacArthur Foundation.

27.

Lawrence

D. S.

Gourdet

Banks

Planty

M. G.

Woods

Jackson

B. A.

(2019). Prosecutor priorities, challenges, and solutions. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR2800/RR2892/RAND_RR2892.pdf

28.

Levitt

(1997). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. The American Economic Review, 87(3), 270–290.

29.

Lin

(2009). More police, less crime: Evidence from the U.S. State data. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(2), 73–80.

30.

Lord

V. B.

Kuhns

J. B.

Friday

P. C.

(2009). Impact of community policing on small city citizens. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 32(4), 574–594.

31.

Maguire

E. R.

Kuhns

J. B.

Uchida

Cox

(1997). Patterns of community policing in Non-Urban America. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 368–394.

32.

Maltz

M. D.

(1999). Bridging gaps in police crime data: A discussion paper from the BJS Fellows program. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

33.

Meldrum

R. C.

Stemen

Kutateladze

B. L.

(2021). Progressive and traditional orientations to prosecution: An empirical assessment in four prosecutorial offices. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(3), 354–372.

34.

Metcalfe

Chiricos

(2018). Race, plea, and charge reduction: An assessment of racial disparities in the plea process. Justice Quarterly, 35(2), 223–253.

35.

Misner

R. L.

(1996). Recasting prosecutorial discretion. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(3), 717–777.

36.

North Carolina Judicial Branch. (2022). Statistical and operational reports 2019-2020. https://www.nccourts.gov/documents/publications/statistical-and-operational-reports-2019-20

37.

Nugent

M. E.

Miller

M. L.

(2002). Basic factors in determining prosecutor workload. The Prosecutor, 36(4), 32–40.

38.

Perry

S. W.

Banks

(2011). Prosecutors in state courts: 2007—Statistical tables. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs.

39.

Peterson

J. L.

Hickman

M. J.

Strom

K. J.

Johnson

D. J.

(2013). Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 58, S78–S90.

40.

Pollitz Worden

. (1990). Policymaking by prosecutors: The uses of discretion in regulating plea bargaining. Judicature, 73, 335–340.

41.

Richardson

Kutateladze

B. L.

(2021). Tempering expectations: A qualitative study of prosecutorial reform. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(1), 41–73.

42.

Skolnick

(1965). The sociology of law in America: Overview and trends. Social Problems, 13, 4–39.

43.

Spohn

Tellis

(2019). Sexual assault case outcomes: Disentangling the overlapping decisions of police and prosecutors. Justice Quarterly, 36(3), 383–411.

44.

Steffensmeier

Ulmer

Kramer

(1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763–797.

45.

Stemen

Escobar

(2018). Whither the prosecutor? Prosecutor and county effects on guilty plea outcomes in Wisconsin. Justice Quarterly, 37(7), 1166–1194.

46.

Testa

Johnson

(2020). Paying the trial tax: Race, guilty pleas, and disparity in prosecution. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(4), 500–531.

47.

Tyler

(2009). Legitimacy and community cooperation with law enforcement. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gKMFDM8vYI

48.

Tyler

Fagan

(2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–275.

49.

United States Census. (2021). Estimated 2019 county populations developed using the Census data tools. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/

50.

Urban Institute. (2022). State and local finance initiative, police and corrections expenditures. https://www.urban.org/policy-centers/cross-center-initiatives/state-and-local-finance-initiative/state-and-local-backgrounders/police-and-corrections-expenditures#Question3Police

51.

Wentz

E. A.

(2020). Funneled through or filtered out: An examination of police and prosecutorial decision-making in adult sexual assault cases. Violence against Women, 26(15–16), 1919–1940.

52.

World Population Review. (2020). Charlotte, North Carolina population 2022. http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/charlotte-population/

53.

World Population Review. (2022). U.S. Counties. https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-counties