Do the Means Matter? Defense Attorneys’ Perceptions of Procedural Transgressions by Police and Their Implication on Police Legitimacy

Abstract

Through interviews (n = 40) and surveys (n = 140) with separate samples of U.S. defense attorneys practicing criminal law in a Northeastern state, we utilize a mixed-methods approach to explore police procedural transgressions (e.g., pretextual stops, overreaching searches) during stops, searches, and seizures. With a structural equation path model, we examine whether and how procedural justice (an assessment of “the means” to control crime) and police effectiveness (an assessment of police performance or “the ends”) affect each other and influence perceptions of police legitimacy. Our findings indicate that procedural justice enhances perceptions of police legitimacy, whereas police effectiveness does not have an effect. Policy implications for developing mechanisms that discourage procedural transgressions by police are discussed.

Keywords

procedural justice police legitimacy noble cause corruption defense attorneys

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alpert

G. P.

MacDonald

J. M.

Dunham

R. G.

(2005). Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology, 43(2), 407–434.

Alpert

G. P.

Noble

J. J.

(2009). Lies, true lies, and conscious deception: Police officers and the truth. Police Quarterly, 12(2), 237–254.

Alschuler

A. W.

(1974). The defense attorney’s role in plea bargaining. The Yale Law Journal, 84(6), 1179–1314.

Alward

L. M.

Baker

(2019). Justice-involved males’ procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Examining the spill-over effect. Criminal Justice Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2019.1706876

Baker

(2017). Exploring the relationship of shared race/ethnicity with court actors, perceptions of court procedural justice, and obligation to obey among male offenders. Race and Justice, 7(1), 87–102.

Baker

Pelfrey

W. V.

Jr Bedard

L. E.

Dhungana

Gertz

Golden

(2014). Female inmates’ procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Is there a spill-over of police effects? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 144–162.

Beetham

(1991). The legitimation of power. Humanities Press International.

Blanks

(2016). Thin blue lies: How pretextual stops undermine police legitimacy. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 66(4), 931–946.

Bradford

Hohl

Jackson

MacQueen

(2015). Obeying the rules of the road: Procedural justice, social identity, and normative compliance. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(2), 171–191.

10.

Bradford

Quinton

(2014). Self-legitimacy, police culture and support for democratic policing in an English constabulary. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 1023–1046.

11.

Brunson

R. K.

Miller

(2005). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46(4), 613–640.

12.

Byrne

B. M.

(2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. Routledge.

13.

Campbell

(2016). The big stink about garbage: State v. McMurray and a reasonable expectation of privacy. Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice, 36(3), 14–26.

14.

Crank

J. P.

Caldero

M. A.

(2000). Police ethics: The corruption of noble cause. Anderson.

15.

Davis

Whyde

Langton

(2018). Contacts between police and the public, 2015. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cpp15.pdf

16.

Dubber

M. D.

(2000). Policing possession: The war on crime and the end of criminal law. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 91, 829–996.

17.

Eisenstein

Flemming

R. B.

Nardulli

P. F.

(1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Little, Brown.

18.

Epp

Maynard-Moody

(2014, August 29). How to rebuild trust between the police and African Americans. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-to-rebuild-trust-between-the-police-and-african-americans/2014/08/29/77c59ace-2d50-11e4-994d-202962a9150c_story.html?noredirect=on

19.

Fagan

Braga

A. A.

Brunson

R. K.

Pattavina

(2016). Stops and stares: Street stops, surveillance, and race in the new policing. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 43, 539–614.

20.

Ferdik

F. V.

Wolfe

S. E.

Blasco

(2014). Informal social controls, procedural justice and perceived police legitimacy: Do social bonds influence evaluations of police legitimacy? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(3), 471–492.

21.

Gould

J. B.

Mastrofski

S. D.

(2006). Suspect searches: Assessing police behavior under the U.S. Constitution. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 315–362.

22.

Grano

J. D.

(1971). A dilemma for defense counsel: Spinelli-Harris search warrants and the possibility of police perjury. University of Illinois Law Forum, 3, 405–457.

23.

Harris

D. A.

(2009). How accountability-based policing can reinforce or replace the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7, 149–213.

24.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

25.

International Association of Chiefs of Police. (2019). Law enforcement code of ethics. https://www.theiacp.org/resources/law-enforcement-code-of-ethics

26.

Jacobi

(2011). The law and economics of the Exclusionary Rule. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(2), 585–676.

27.

Katz

(2015). Enhancing accountability and trust with independent investigations of police lethal force (commentary). Harvard Law Review. https://harvardlawreview.org/2015/04/enhancing-accountability-and-trust-with-independent-investigations-of-police-lethal-force/

28.

Kleinig

(2002). Rethinking noble cause corruption. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 4(4), 287–314.

29.

Klockars

C. B.

(1980). The Dirty Harry problem. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 452(1), 33–47.

30.

Kochel

T. R.

Parks

Mastrofski

S. D.

(2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895–925.

31.

LaFave

W. R.

(1965). Improving police performance through the Exclusionary Rule—Part I: Current police and local court practices. Missouri Law Review, 30, 391–458.

32.

Lvovsky

(2016). The judicial presumption of police expertise. Harvard Law Review, 130, 1995–2081.

33.

Maxwell

J. A.

(2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). SAGE.

34.

Mears

D. P.

(2017). Out-of-control criminal justice: The systems improvement solution for more safety, justice, accountability, and efficiency. Cambridge University Press.

35.

Meltzer

D. J.

(1988). Deterring constitutional violations by law enforcement officials: Plaintiffs and defendants as private attorneys general. Columbia Law Review, 88, 247–328.

36.

Moreno

J. A.

(2015). Rights, remedies, and the quantum and burden of proof. Virginia Journal of Criminal Law, 3, 89–174.

37.

Nardulli

P. F.

(1986). Insider justice: Defense attorneys and the handling of felony cases. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77(2), 379–417.

38.

New York Civil Liberties Union. (2018). Stop and frisk data. http://www.nyclu.org/content/stop-and-frisk-data

39.

Nir

(2018). Approaching the bench: Accessing elites on the judiciary for qualitative interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(1), 77–89.

40.

Orfield

M. W.

Jr. (1992). Deterrence, perjury, and the heater factor: An exclusionary rule in the Chicago criminal courts. University of Colorado Law Review, 63, 75–162.

41.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.

42.

Peck

J. H.

(2015). Minority perceptions of the police: A state-of-the-art review. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38(1), 173–203.

43.

Pickett

J. T.

Ryon

S. B.

(2017). Procedurally just cooperation: Explaining support for due process reforms in policing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 9–20.

44.

Rigdon

E. E.

(1995). A necessary and sufficient identification rule for structural models estimated in practice. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(3), 359–383.

45.

Rojek

Rosenfeld

Decker

(2012). Policing race: The racial stratification of searches in police traffic stops. Criminology, 50(4), 993–1024.

46.

Sharpe

A. N.

(1995). Police performance crime as structurally coerced action. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 5(3), 201–220.

47.

Skogan

W. G.

(2006). Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 16(2), 99–126.

48.

Skogan

W. G.

Frydl

(2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. The National Academies Press.

49.

Small

M. W.

Watson

R. C.

(1999). Police values and police misconduct: The Western Australia Police Service. The Police Journal, 72(3), 225–237.

50.

Sun

I. Y.

Farmer

A. K.

(2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: Does Western wisdom hold in China? Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 54(4), 454–478.

51.

Tankebe

(2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103–135.

52.

Trahan

Stewart

D. M.

(2013). Toward a pragmatic framework for mixed-methods research in criminal justice and criminology. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 9(1), 59–74.

53.

Tyler

T. R.

(2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99.

54.

Tyler

T. R.

(2006). Why people obey the law?. Princeton University Press.

55.

Tyler

T. R.

(2017). Procedural justice and policing: A rush to judgment? Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 29–53.

56.

Tyler

T. R.

Goff

P. A.

MacCoun

R. J.

(2015). The impact of psychological science on policing in the United States: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and effective law enforcement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(3), 75–109.

57.

van Halderen

R. C.

Kolthoff

. (2017). Noble cause corruption revisited: Toward a structured research approach. Public Integrity, 19(3), 274–293.

58.

Walters

G. D.

Bolger

P. C.

(2019). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 341–372.

59.

Watson

A. C.

Angell

Vidalon

Davis

(2010). Measuring perceived procedural justice and coercion among persons with mental illness in police encounters: The Police Contact Experience Scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(2), 206–226.

60.

Wilson

M. D.

(2010). Improbable cause: A case for judging police by a more majestic standard. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 15, 259–324.

61.

Wolfe

S. E.

Nix

Kaminski

Rojek

(2016). Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 253–282.