This study examines if judges sentence criminal corporations that are more blameworthy in the commission of crimes to community service penalties. This blameworthiness consideration is drawn from the focal concerns framework. The study uses data compiled by the U.S. Sentencing Commission from court documents for the cases of 1125 corporations that were sentenced in federal criminal courts nationwide between October 1, 2010, and September 30, 2017. Results showed that corporations with higher base fines were significantly more likely to be sentenced to terms of community service compared to those corporations with base fines. Policy implications are discussed.
AllisonP. D. (2001). Missing data (Vol. 136). SAGE.
2.
AnagnostakiM. (2011). Community service in Greece: Sentencing practices, the role of the prosecution service and local authorities. European Journal of Criminology, 8(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370810397256
3.
BarronJ. (2011). A high-wire act: Maintaining workforce trust in an era of high fraud losses. Business Credit, 113(6), 38–41.
4.
BouffardJ. A.MufticL. R. (2006). Program completion and recidivism outcomes among adult offenders ordered to complete a community service sentence. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v43n02_01
5.
CarterR. M.CocksJ.GlaserD. (1987). Community service: A review of the basic issues. Federal Probation, 51(1), 4–10.
6.
ClinardM. B.YeagerP. C. (1980). Corporate crime. Transaction.
7.
DegelmanC.DoggettK.MedinaG. (2006). Giving back: Introducing community service learning. ncjrs.gov
8.
DemuthS.SteffensmeierD. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85(4), 994–1011.
9.
Federal Corrections and Supervision Division. (2001). Court & community—Community service. http://www.nhp.uscourts.gov
10.
FeeleyM. M.BerkR.CampbellA. (1992). Between two extremes: An examination of the efficiency and effectiveness of community service orders and their implications for the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Southern California Law Review, 1992-1993(1), 155–208.
11.
FisseB. (1981). Community service as a sanction against corporations. Wisconsin Law Review, 1981(5), 970–1017.
12.
FlacksM. (2006). Combining retribution and reconciliation: The role of community service sentencing in transitional justice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law, 1(1), 1–25.
13.
FreiburgerT. L. (2011). The impact of gender, offense type, and familial role on the decision to incarcerate. Social Justice Research, 24(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-011-0133-8
14.
GalvinM. A. (2015). Sentencing corporate crime: Responses to scandal and Sarbanes-Oxley (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (UMI No. 1707671253)
15.
GarciaC. A. (2015). Community-based sanctions and juveniles: What works, what does not, and what looks promising. In KrohnM. D.LaneJ. (Eds.), The handbook of juvenile delinquency and juvenile justice (pp. 459-494). John Wiley.
16.
GouletteN. W. (2013). Are female defendants treated more leniently by judges? A multilevel analysis of sex-based disparities at the phases of pretrial release, charge reductions, and sentencing (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from GenderWatch; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (UMI No. 1466304267)
17.
GreenupK. M. (2010). Punishing white-collar crime: An examination of judicial sentencing practices in federal fraud and embezzlement cases (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (UMI No. 305241713)
18.
GrunerR. S. (1993). Beyond fines: Innovative corporate sentences under federal sentencing guidelines. Washington University Law Quarterly, 71(2), 261–328.
19.
HarrisR. J.LoT. W. (2002). Community service: Its use in criminal justice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(4), 427–444.
20.
HodasD. R. (1995). Enforcement of environmental law in a triangular federal system: Can three not be a crowd when enforcement authority is shared by the United States, and their citizens?Maryland Law Review, 54(4), 1552–1657.
21.
HomerE. M.HigginsG. E. (forthcoming). Corporation blameworthiness and federal criminal fines. Journal of Financial Crime.
PampelF. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. SAGE.
26.
PetersiliaJ.DeschenesE. P. (1994). What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison vs. intermediate sanctions. Federal Probation, 58(1), 3–6.
27.
RossE.PritikinM. (2011). The collection gap: Underenforcement of corporate and white-collar fines and penalties. Yale Law & Policy Review, 29(2), 453–526.
28.
Schell-BuseyN. (2017). Do extralegal variables impact the post-inspection process of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration?Crime, Law and Social Change, 68(1–2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9681-7
29.
SpohnC.HolleranD. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38(1), 281–306.
30.
SteffensmeierD.DemuthS. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–729.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.StreifelC. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology, 31(3), 411–446.
33.
SteffensmeierD.KramerJ.UlmerJ. (1995). Age differences in sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 12(3), 583–602.
34.
SteffensmeierD.Painter-DavisN.UlmerJ. (2017). Intersectionality of race, ethnicity, gender, and age on criminal punishment. Sociological Perspectives, 60(4), 810–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416679371
35.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798.
36.
StuckeM. E. (2014). In search of effective ethics & compliance programs. Journal of Corporation Law, 2014(4), 769–832.
37.
SutherlandE. H. (1983). White collar crime: The uncut version. Yale University Press. (Original work published 1949)
38.
ThomasD.HunninenM. (2008). Making things right: Meaningful community service for juvenile offenders. http://restorativejustice.org
39.
TonryM. (1999). Community penalties in the United States. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7(1), 5–22.
40.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2016, December1). Princess Cruise Lines to pay largest-ever criminal penalty for deliberate vessel pollution [Press release]. www.justice.gov
41.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2017a, September18). Essential oils company sentenced for Lacey Act and Endangered Species Act Violations to pay $760,000 in fines, forfeiture, and community service, and to implement a comprehensive compliance plan [Press release]. www.justice.gov
42.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2017b, January26). PG&E ordered to develop compliance and ethics program as part of its sentence for engaging in criminal conduct [Press release]. www.justice.gov
43.
United States Sentencing Commission. (2017). Organizations convicted in federal criminal courts, 2015 [data and codebook]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36573.v1
WeaverG. R.TreviñoL. K.CochranP. L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 41–57.
46.
WongD. (2000). A more efficient alternative to fines in deterring corporate misconduct. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 6(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z380K8S
47.
WoodP. B.GrasmickH. G. (1999). Toward the development of punishment equivalencies: Male and female inmates rate the severity of alternative sanctions compared to prison. Justice Quarterly, 16(1), 19–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829900094041
48.
WoodP. B.MayD. C. (2003). Racial differences in perceptions of the severity of sanctions: A comparison of prison with alternatives. Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820300095631
